2006/11/21 Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force TMDL Task ForceAGREEMENT TO FORM
THE LAKE BLSINORE AND CANYON LAKN TMDL TASK FORCE
This Agreement, entered into as of this A day of 2006, to form the Lake
Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force (hereinafter "AGREEMENT'is made by and among thefollowing entities, which are hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as "TASK FoRCE
AGENCIES" or individually as "TASK FORCE AGENCY":
United States Departrnent of Agriculture, Forest
Service (Forest Service)
US Air Force (March Air Reserve Base)
March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority
California Depaftnent of Transpoltation
Califomia Department of Fish and Game
County of fuverside
City of Beaumont
City ofCanyon Lake
City of Hemet
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Moreno Valley
City of Murrieta
City of Penis
City of Riverside
City of San Jacinto
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Eastem Municipal Water District
Western Riverside County Agriculture Coalition
on behalfofthe Agricultural Operators in the
San Jacinto fuver Basin
Westem Riverside County Agriculture Coalltion
on behalf of the Dairy Operators in the San
Jacinto River Basin
Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District
A. Whereas, in 1998, the Santa Ana Regional Water euality Control Board
(hereinafter "Regional Board") designated Lalie Elsinore and canyon Lake in the Lake Elsinore
and Sal Jacinto watersheds (collectively the "watersheds") as "impaired water bodies"
pursuant to Section 303(d) of the federal clean water Act because of high levels of algae in both
lakes and low dissolved oxygen in Lake Elsinore, aftributed to excess phosphorus and nitrogen
(NUTRIENTS). As a result of said Section 303 designation, the Clean Warer Act requires rhat
total maximum daily loads (hereinafter "TMDLs") be established by the Regional Board lor
flresg waterbodies,
I. RECITALS
B. Whereas, in response to the Section 303(d) designation, the Regional Board
adopted a Rcsolution R8-2004-0037 on December 20,2004 amending the Watcr Quality Control
Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin (BASIN PLAN AMENDMENT) to incoryorare nutrienl
TMDLs for Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore. The Basin Plan Anendment specifies, among
other things, an Implementation Plan (TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN), which holds
speciflred stake holders (TASK FORCE AGENCIES) individually and/or jointly liable for.
complying with the TMDLs by means of specific tasks to be completed by specihed datcs untler.
penalty of law. Thcse tasks includc dcvelopmont and implementation of a watershed-rvidc
nutrient water quality monitoring prcgram, developrnent of an in-lake nutrient monitorillq
I
program for Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore, development of a plan and schedule for in-lake
sediment nutrient reduction for Lake Elsinore, development of a plan and schedule for evaluating
in-lake sediment nuaient strategies for Canyon Lake, updating watershed and in-lake nutrient
TMDL water quality models, developing a pollutant tmding plan, a:rd reviewing and revising the
TMDL to reflect updated data and science.
C. Whereas, the purpose of this AGREEMENT is to form a task force (hereinafter
'TASK FORCE") to implement certain tasks idenrified in the TMDL IMPLEMENTATION
PLAN and to pursue TMDL related tasks agreed upon by TASK FORCE AGENCIES, and
D. Whereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES agree that the purpose of this TASK
FORCE is to (1) review and develop recommendations to update the TMDL BASIN PLAN
AMENDMENT based on the best available scientific information, and (2) implement TMDL
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Tasks identified below and jointly assigned to TASK FORCE
AGENCIES, and (3) propose appropriate revisions to the TMDL BASIN PLAN AMENDMENT
to the Santa Ana RWQCB by June 30, 2010, and (4) allow watershed stakeholders to participate
in efforts to meet appropriate water quality standards so that Canyon Lake and/or Lake Elsinore
can be de-listed from the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list of impaired water bodies, and
E. Whereas, hundreds ofindividual agricultural and dairy operators are subject to the
Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore TMDLs and its component TMDL IMPLEMENTATION
PLAN, and
F. Whereas the Western Riverside County Agricultural Coalition(WRCAC) is a non-
profit organization representing the interests of agricultural and dairy operators within the San
Jacinto Watershed, and
G. Whereas WRCAC's membership is open to any and all agricultural and dairy
operators within the San Jacinto watershed, and
H. Whereas, March Air Reserve Base (MARB) is an installation of the United States Air
Force, and the Saa Bemardino and Cleveland National Forest are on federal lands under the
administration and management of the Forest Service. Both are agencies of the federal
government, and are therefore subject to limitations in their ability to comply with every
provision stated herein to the same extent that other non-federal TASK FORCE AGENCIES are
able to comply. These limitations are based upon, but not limited to, those identified in the
federal Clean Water Act, the federal Antideficiency Act, the principle of sovereign immuniry and
the holdings of the Supreme Court of the United States, and other binding federal court
decisions, as they interpret those sources of federal law. The limitations so mentioned include,
but ale not limited to, the availability of federal funding to pay for participation in this program,
and the ability of MARB and Forest Service to participate directly in sampling, research or data
gathering activities which are not located on or near MARB or National Forest System lands or a
point source of water discharge arising on MARB or National Forest System lands, or other
activities not specifically authorized by the Federal Clean Water Act section 313. To the extent
that the limitations described herein prevent MARB or Forest Service from fully participating in
any aspect of this program, they reserve the right, in theb sole discretion, to participate in the
program as a matter of comity. By entering into this agreement, MARB and Forest Service do
not authorize any of the TASK FORCE AGENCIES to exercise regulatory authority over them.
MARB and Forest Service agree that State and federal regulatory agencies that are or may
2
,
03r{r{v3s
k0t
,p"h d ol
become members of this TASK FORCE have regulatory authority over MARB and Forest
Sewice only to the extent permitted by State or Federal Law.
I. Whereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES acknowledge and agree that rhe
effectiveness of the TASK FORCE may be improved by the inclusion of other agencies as
additional TASK FORCE AGENCIES to the TASK FORCE, and
J. Whereas, the Riverside County Flood Contlrcl and Water Conservation District
(RCFC&WCD) serves as the Principal Permittee for the National pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit (MS4) for the
Santa Ana Region ofRiverside County, and
K. Whereas, the County of Riverside and Cities of Beaumont, Canyon Lake, Hcmet,
Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Perris, Riverside, San Jacinto are MS4 CO-
PERMITTEES for the NPDES MS4 Perrnit for the Sanra Ara Region of Riverside County, and
L. Whereas, the MS4 PRINCIPAL PERMITTEE and MS4 CO-PERMITTEES
collectively represent the MS4 PERMITTEES within the San Jacinto Watershed, and
M, Whereas, the NPDES MS4 Permit for the Santa Ana Region of Riverside County
is regulated by the REGIoNAL BOARD and subject to the requiremenis of the nutrient TMDLs
for Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore, and
N, Whereas RCFC&WCD has agreed to provide services on behalf of itself as anNPDES MS4 PERMITTEE and on behalf of the MS4 CO-PERMITTEES for the purposes of
this AGREEMENT, and
O. Whereas RCFC&WCD has prepared and reviewed the MS4 CO-PERMITTEES
cost share allocation with MS4 Co-PERMITTEE staff at the NPDES MS4 permit TechnicatAdvisory committee Meetings and with the affected city Managers and county Executiveoffice, or designated representatives thereof during the NpDES MS4 permit Management
Steering Committee Meeting ofFebruary 16, 2006, and
P. Whereas, the TMDL assigned nutrient waste load allocarions for supplemental
water (herein SUPPLEMENTAL WATER) addition to Lake Elsinore to stabilize the Lake,s
elevation, and
a. Whereas, the nutrient waste load allocation for SUppLEMENTAL WATER,
which includes Island well water. EVMWD treatment plant effluent, and other sources of non-
slormwater, may reduce the TMDL waste load allocation and rMDL load allocation of otherpoint and non-point sources because in-lake nutrient capacity was not adjusted to account lor
increased Iake levels associated with the addition of SUppLEMENTAL WATER, and
R. Whereas, the assumprions regarding load allocations for SUPPLEMENTAL
WATER may not be consistent with the actual operarion of SUPPLEMENTAL WATER
sources, and
3
S. Whereas, the City of Lake Elsinore and EVMWD previously entered into an
agreement to equally share the cost of SUPPLEMENTAL WATER addition to the Lake under
the "Lake Elsinore Comprehensive Water Managernent Agreement", and
T. Whereas, for the purposes of this AGREEMENT, the City of Lake Elsinore shall
be ackr:owledged and recognized as a separate ernd equal contributor with EVMWD for the cost
and voting rights accorded under this AGREEMENT attributed to E\IMWD for
SUPPLEMENTAL WATER addition, and
U. Whereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES have considered many alternative cost
sharing methodologies based on TMDL assigned load allocation, load reduction, and
permutations thereof; and
V. Whereas, certain TASK FORCE AGENCIES were strong proponents of cost
sharing based on load allocation and other TASK FORCE AGENCIES were strong proponents
of cost sharing based on load reduction, and
W. whereas, these TASK FORCE AGENCIES have been unable to agree upon a
methodology for distributing costs based on either an allocation or a load reduction
methodology; and
X. Whereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES have reviewed and agreed upon an
interirn negotiated cost allocation methodology acceptable to all TASK FORCE AGENCIES for
the purposes of initiating the TASK FORCE, based on consideration of TMDL assigned load
allocations, load reductions, and permutations thereof, and
Y. Whereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES agree that certain nutrient dischargers
have been either inappropriately named or not named as responsible parties for various tasks in
Ore BASIN PLAN AMENDMENT; and
Z. Whereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES agree that agricultural and dairy lands
are convefiing to urban and open space lands, ald
AA. Whereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES agree that an amendment to the TMDL
to address, at minimurn, the proper naming of responsible parties for various tasks in the TMDL
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, to con'ect the load allocation .and waste load allocations to
properly address the impacts of SUPPLEMENTAL WATER on Lake Elsinore, and to revise the
load allocation and waste Ioad allocations to address the ongoing conversion of agriculture and
dairy lands to urban and/or open space should be addressed as part of a revision to the TMDL
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, and
BB. Wlereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES agree that upon amendment of the
existing BASIN PLAN AMENDMENT, including the TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, by
the Regional Board to address, at a minimum, the issues described in Recital Z, the TASK
FORCE AGENCIES will amend this AGREEMENT to revise the cost allocation methodology
for future fiscal years to incorporate a task-specific cost sharing methodology, based on assigned
load allocation or waste load allocation of TASK FORCE AGENCIES, or categories of TASK
FORCE AGENCIES, responsible for each TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN task, zurd
4
CC. Whereas, MARB agrees to budget for and to participate in the TASK FORCE,
provided that sufficient funds are appropriated by the Congress, in FY 06-07 and future years,
and on the condition that funding requirements under this agreement do not violate the Anti-
deficiency Act, and provided that the Task Force Agencies agree to relocate the proposed
monitoring station from Kitching Channel to the Heacock drainage channel, and use any fees
provided by MARB, for participation in this program, to establish and monitor this station.
5
NOW, THEREFORE; in consideration of the foregoing recitals and mutual covenanls
contained herein, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES agree as follows:
l. Creation of a Task FOICC.There is hereby created a "Lake Elsinore and Canyon
Lake TMDL Task Force" C'TASK FORCE") initially consisting of the TASK
FORCE AGENCIES and certain Non-Voting, Non-Funding Members as morc
specifically provided for in paragraph 2 below.
a Appoinlment. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, each
TASK FORCE AGENCY shall, in accordance with such TASK FORCE
AGENCY':r own goveming provisions. appourt one primary
representative to the TASK FORCE and one alternate representative to act
in the abseirce of the primary representative (hereinafter collectivcly
referred to as *REPRESENTATI\aES" or individually as
'REPRESENTATIVE"). The REPRESENTATIVES shall have the
authority to act on behalf of its appointing TASK FORCE AGENCY. The
REPRESENTATIVES shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing TASK
FORCE AGENCY and may be removed al any time, with or without
cause by such TASK FORCE AGENCY; provided, however, that the
TASK FORCE AGENCIES acknowledge and agree the continuity of'
representation on the TASK FORCE is important to the overall
effectiveness of the TASK FORCE, and the TASK FORCE AGENCIES
funher agree 10 ensure such continuity whenever possible.
Additional Aeencies. The TASK FORCE AGENCIES acknowledge and
agree that the effectiveness ofthe TASK FORCE may be improved by the
inclusion of other agencies as additional TASK FORCE AGENCIES to
the TASK ITORCE. Such agencies may join the TASK FORCE on such
wriften terms and conditions as are acceptable to all then existing TASK
FORCE AGENCIES of the TASK FORCE, including, but not limited ro,
agreed-upon cash contributions for past, present, and/or future work, of
the TASK FORCE. The inclusion of such agencies as additional TASK
FORCE AGENCIES to the TASK FORCE shall be effected by a writren
amendment to this AGREEMENT signed by all then existing TASI(
FORCE AGENCIES. Such additional TASK FORCE AGENCIES shall
each appoint their TASK FORCE primary REPRESENTATIVE and
altemate REPRESENTATIVE as provided in Section II.2.a. above or in
said written amendment. The following agencies will be considered for
inclusion as additional TASK FORCE AGENCIES in future amendments
to this AGREEMENT withir the meaning of this section:
Any other named stakeholder in any future amendments ofthe
BASIN PLAN AMENDMENT.
b
6
II. COVENANTS
2. Reoresentation on the Task Force.
C N n-Fu M . The Regional Board, Lake Elsinore
and San Jacinto Watersheds Authority and the San Jacinto River
Watershed Council are hereby appointed as Non-Voting, Non-Funding
Members of the TASK FORCE- Additional Non-Voting, Non-Funding
Members may be appointed by a majority vote of the TASK FORCE
representatives. Non-Voting, Non-Funding Members appointed herein,
and any appointed in the future are authorized only to make
recommendations upon the functioning of this TASK FORCE and the
development of this program. Federal, State and local regulatory agencies
acting as Non-Voting, Non-Funding Members, now or in the future, retain
authority to regulale TASK FORCE MEMBERS on.ly to the extent that
they are so authorizcd under stnte and federal law.
Dairv and CU hrral The TASK FORCE AGENCIES
aclnowledge that the Western Riverside County Agdculture Coalition
(WRCAC) shall represent the collective interest of both agnculrural and
dairy operators in the San Jacinto River Watershed in the TASK FORCE
at this time. WRCAC shall appoint two primary TASK FORCE
REPRESENTATIVES and two alternate REPRESENTATIVES as
provided in Section IL2.a. One set of REPRESENTATIVES shall be
desigr:ated for agricultural operator interests, the other set of
REPRESENTATIVES shall be designated for dairy interesls for the
purposes of this TASK FORCE.
Committees. The TASK FORCE may establish subcommittees, consisting
of REPRESENTATIVES and Non-Voting, Non-Funding Members who
shall be selected by, and serve at the plea^sure of, the TASK FORCE.
Task Force Administrator. A TASK FORCE administrator (hereinafter
"TASK FORCE ADMINISTRATOR") shall be appointed by the TASK
FORCE. The TASK FORCE ADMINISTRATOR shall have the
following administrative responsibilities:
(1) Organizing and facilitating TASK FORCE meetings;(2) Secretaria.l,clerical,andadministrativeservices;(3) Managing TASK FORCE funds and preparing amual reports of
TASK FORCE assets and expenditures;(4) Retaining TASK FORCE-authorized consultants; and(5) Seeking funding grants to assist with achieving the work of the
TASK FORCE and other goals and objectives approved by TASK
FORCE AGENCIES.
The TASK FORCE AGENCIES hereby appoint the Lake Elsinore and
San Jacinto Watersheds Authority as the initial TASK FORCE
ADMINISTRATOR,
d.
I
7
Meetinss of the Task Folce
(i)Frequencv and Location. The TASK FORCE shall, by resolution
or motion, agree upon the time and place for holding its regular
meetings. Special meetings may be called at the request of the
TASK FORCE ADMINISTRATOR or by a majority of the TASK
FORCE REPRESENTATIVES.
(ii)Task Force Chair The TASK FORCE REPRESENTATIVES shall
select a chair and a vice-chair. The temr ofthe chair and vice-chatr
shall be one year and shall be rotated among the TASK FORCE
REPRESENTATIVES interested in serving as chair.
(iii) Ouorum. One half or more of the REPR-ESENTATIVES of the
TASK FORCE shall constitute a QUORUM.
(iv) Votips. Actions of the TASK FORCE shall be validly taken only
when a QUORUM is present and upon the affirmative vote of a
MAJOzuTY of the TASK FORCE REPRESENTATIVES. A
MAJORITY of the REPRESENTATIVES shall be determined as
follows:
Each TASK FORCE AGENCY shall have one vote (herein
VOTE) assigned for each $1,000 increment ofPRO RATA COST
SHARE, as described in Paragraph IL5 below, contributed to the
TASK FORCE budget developed for a given fiscal year
(hereinafter 'BUDGET"). A MAJORITY of the
REPRESENTATIVES shall consist of greater than 50% of the
total VOTES based on the BUDGET for the fiscal year during
which the action is taken.
(v)Brown Act. All meetings of the TASK FORCE or any of its
commiftees shall be conducted as may be required by any
applicable provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Califoniia
Govemment Code $$54950 et seq.). The provisions contained in
the Ralph M. Brown Act shall prevail in the event of any conflict
with provisions contaired in this AGREEMENT.
The TASK FORCE may adopt such additional rules and regulations as may be required
for the conduct of its affairs so long as such rules and regulations do not conflict with this
AGR.EEMENT.
Work of the Task Force. The TASK FORCE shall perform the following tasks in
accordance with guidelines established by the Regional Board:
To retain consulting services to review scientific and other assumptions
contained within the TMDL. Consultant(s) shall provide a report
identifying preliminary TMDL opportunities such as site specific
objectives, pollutant trading shategies, and integration strategies. The final
8
3
a
scope of work shall be approved by the Task Force. The report shall
specifically consider assumptioos supporting the TMDL. The report
should also provide preliminary analysis of the ability to achieve in-lake
nutrient reductions and verify that load assignments are appropriate. Upon
completion of the report, Consultant(s) shall also review work described
herein, and make recommendations to ensure that work is specifically
designed to resolve any deficiencies, where appropriate. Consultant(s)
shall also coordinate development of BASIN PLAN AMENDMENT
language, in coordination with the Regional Board, which can be used to
revise the TMDLS as part ofthe Regional Board's Triennial Reviews at a
minimum, or no later than by June 2010.
b. TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Task 4 - Develop and Implement a
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitorins Prosram. This program shall obtain
data necessary to update the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Nutrient
TMDL, and to determine compliance with interim and final nitrogen and
phosphorus allocations, and compliance with the nitrogen and phosphorus
TMDLs. Monitoring and management of monitoring data to update the
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDL shall commence
immediately upon approval of this AGREEMENT. An amual repon
summarizing the data collected for the year shall be submitted to the
Regional Board by August 15 of each year commencing in 2007.
c. TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Task 4 - Develop and Inrplement a
Lake Elsinore and Canvon Lake Nutrient Monitorins Proqrarn, This
program shall obtain data necessary to update the Lake Elsinore and
Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDLs, and to determine compliance with interim
and final nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll a and dissolved oxygen
numeric targets. In addition, the monitoring program shall determine the
relationship between ammonia toxicity and the total nitrogen allocation ro
ensure that the total nifogen allocation will prevent ammonia toxicitf in
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake. Monitoring and management of
monitoring data shall commence immedialely upon approval of this
agreement. An annual report summarizing the data collected for the yeal'
shall be submiued to the Regional Board by August 15 of each year
commencing in 2007.
lmDlement a Plan to Reduce NUTRI ENTS in Lake Elsinore sediments and
develop a sediment nutrient treatment evaluation plan for Canyon Lahe
The plans shall evaluate the efficacy of various in-lake treatment
technologies to prevent the release of NUTRIENTS irom lake sediments
as a long-term strategy for control of NUTRIENTS in the sediment. The
program may also include a sediment nutrient monitoring program to
evaluate the effectiveness of any technologies that may be implemented.
Target Date for Completion: March 3 1, 2007.
TMDL IMI'LEMENTATION PLAN Task l1 - Develop and loplement a
Uodatins
C
Plan and Schedule for
9
the Existine Lake Elsinore/San Jacinto
d. TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Tasks 9 and 10 - Develop and
fuver Watershed Nukient Model and the Canvon Lake and e Elsinore
In-Lake Models. Develop and implement a plan and schedule to update
and execute Watersheds and in-lake models to track the progress of
TMDL efforts. In-lake models should be analyzed as soon as sufficient
data becomes available, Target Date for Completion: March 3 I, 2007.
f. TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Task 12 - Investisate.Develop and
Imnlement a Pollutant Trading Plan Investigate the I'easibility of
pollurant trading in the Watersheds, and develop a feasibility plan for
Regional Board review and approval. Target Date for Completion:
September 30,2007.
h. Other Tasks. The TASK FORCE may undertake such other plans,
programs and studies as authorized by the TASK FORCE pursuant to
II.2.g. of this AGREEMENT.
i. Limitations on MARB and Forest Service. As described above in Section
I.H, MARB is an agency of the federal government atrd is therefore unable
to participate in each and every aspect of Section 3 to the same extent as
other TASK FORCE MEMBERS. To the extent that it is unable to
participate in any tasks under section 3, it resewes the right, in its sole
discretion, to participate to the fullest extent that it is able, as a matter of
comity.
Budsets. Beginning in FY2007-2008, the total annual budget (BUDGET),
adjusted to remove in-kind services, grant funding and funding credits associated
with this AGREEMENT shall not exceed $!!QQ!Q, except as authorized by the
TASK FORCE via two-thirds approval via VOTES based on the BUDGET for
the then current fiscal year pursua:rt to II.2.g. of this AGREEMENT. The TASK
FORCE ADMINSI'RATOR shall prepare and submit a proposed BUDGET for
each fiscal year of this AGREEMENT to the TASK FORCE AGENCIES by
November 30th. The proposed BUDGET shall include all anticipated costs for
the scope(s) of work developed by the TASK FORCE for the next fiscal year,
The TASK FORCE REPRESENTATIVES shall approve the BUDGET by
December 31'r. Each TASK FORCE AGENCY shall pay its PRO-RATA
SHARE of the approved fiscal year's TASK FORCE BUDGET and arrears by
August 31"r of the foltowing year. The BUDGET for the eighteen (18) month
period starting Jaruary 1, 2006 and extending through June 30, 2007 and
estimated fiscal year BUDGETS though June 30, 2010 are included as
Attachment A to the AGREEMENT. Approval of this AGREEMENT shall
constitute approval of the BUDGET through June 30,2007. Payment of lhe
BUDGET though June 30, 2007 shall be by August 3 l, 2006, or within 30 days
l0
4
g. investiqate Long Term TMDL Implementation Structure. Cost Shadng
Formula and Fundine Sources. Investigate possible long term
administrative structures, cost sharing formulas and funding sources that
can be used to obtail compliance with the TMDL requirements. Target
Date for Completion: June 30, 2010.
5
of the approval of this AGREEMENT by each TASK FORCE AGENCY,
whichever is sooner.
The TASK FORCE ADMINISTRATOR shall endeavor to minimize carry-over
fund balances to those necessary to complete work of the TASK FORCE and to
maintain contingencies limited to those necessary to ensure work of the TASK
FORCE is no1 impeded. Excess not necessary to complete budgeted work ofthe
TASK FORCE or maintain adequate reserves shall be credited back to the TASK
FORCE AGENCIES iN thE BUDGET CONSiStENt With thE PRO.RATA SHARE
methodology described in Paragraph II.5 below. THE TASK FORCE
AGENCIES shall agree to a reasonable reserve balance as part of each year's
BUDGET.
After Septernber 30 of each year, the TASK FORCE ADMINSTRATOR shall
provide an accounting of all PRO RATA SHARES collected via cash or in-kind
oontributions. If PRO RATA SHARES collected are less than BUDGET, the
TASK FORCE shall meet with Regional Board staff to determine appropriate
priorities for scheduled TASK FORCE work and revise BUDGET based on
available funds-
Pro-Rata Share Calculation. The annual PRO-RATA SHARE shall be calculated
in the following manner:
The PRO-RATA SHARE for MS4 CO-PERMITTEES, Agricultural Operators
and EVMWD shall be based on the BUDGET reduced by the value of available
grant funding identified in Section 1 of Attachment A and in-krnd services
identified in Section 3 of Attachment A (LINE lk BUDGET). The PRO-RATA
SHARE for MS4 CO-PERMITTEES, and Agricultural Operators shall each be
28.5yo of the LINE 1k BUDCET. Based on the prior agreement of EVMWD and
the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE involving the sharing of cost for supplemental
water into Lake Elsinore, the PRO-RATE SHARE for EVMWD and the CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE shall eachbe 14.25%o of the LINE lKBUDGET.
The PRO-RATA SHARE for Dairy shall be 5% of the LINE lk BUDGET
The PRO-RATA SIIARE for RCFC&WCD shall be the cash value of the in-kind
services described in Section 3 of Attachment A.
The PRO-RATA SHARE for all other TASK FORCE AGENCIES shall be as a
base amount set forth in the BUDGET.
The PRO-RATA SHARE for additional TASK FORCE AGENCIES shall be per
in kind services and/or an amount agreed upon via wriften amendment of this
AGREEMENT per Section II.2.b.
If the estimated funds collected under the PRO-RATA SHARE calculations
exceed the BUDGET, the contributions of MS4 CO-PERMITTEES, EVMWD,
City of Lake Elsinore, Agricultural Operators, Dairy and other TASK FORCE
l1
6
AGENCIES contributing il excess of the base amount shall be raised or reduced
proportionately based on the percentage of their PRO-RATA SHARE, until the
estimated total PRO-RATA SHARES equals the BUDGET.
RCFC&WCD shall provide the TASK FORCE ADMINSTRATOR with annual
individual MS4 CO-PERMITTEE cost share distribution of the MS4 CO-
PERMITTEES PRO-R{TA SHARE for budgets following Fiscal Year 2006'07 .
The methodology used by RCFC&WCD to calculate the MS4 CO-PERMITEE
cost share distribution may be amended at the NPDES MS4 Management Steering
Committee.
In-Kind Credits. The PRO-RATA SHARE of a TASK FORCE AGENCY shall
be reduced by the value of IN-KIND CREDITS provided toward agreed-upon
budgeted tasks by, or on behalf, of lhe TASK FORCE AGENCY(S). Credits
shall be applied to each budget period and adjusted at the end of each budget year
based on actual verified costs.
ifi ations to the TASK methodolo The
methodology deriving the TASK FORCE PRO-RATA SHARE as provided in
Section Ii.5 of this AGREEMENT may be modified upon wdtten approval of all
then existing TASK FORCE AGENCIES whose PRO-RATA SIIARE would be
affected.
The TASK FORCE AGENCIES shall cooperate fully with one another to attain
the purposes of this AGREEMENT,
Nothing in this AGREEMENT, nor the work set forth in this AGREEMENT, nor
any activity approved or carried out by the TASK FORCE AGENCIES
hereunder, is intended to be nor shall be interpreted as a waiver by TASK FORCE
AGENCIES of the "Maximum Extent Practicable" standard set foth in tlie Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. Section l-251 et seq.).
Each TASK FORCE AGENCY shall indemnify, defend, and hold each of the
other TASK FORCE AGENCIES, including their special districts, officials,
agents, officers, and employees, harmless fiom and against any and all liability
and expense arisirg from any act or omission of such TASK FORCE AGENCY,its officials, agents, officers, and employees, il connection with this
AGREEMENT, including but not limited to defense costs, legal fees, claims,
actions, and causes of aclion for damages of ary nature whatsoever, including but
not limited to bodily injury, death, personal injury, or property damage; provided,
however, that no TASK FORCE AGENCY shall indemdfii another TASK
FORCE AGENCY for that TASK FORCE AGENCY's own negligence or williil
misconduct.
MARB and the Forest Service, as agencies ofthe federal govenunent, are unable
to indemnify or hold harmless any other TASK FORCE AGENCY for any
liability arising under this agreement. MARB and the Forest Service expressly do
not indemnify or hold harmless any TASK FORCE AGENCY for any injuries or
l2
8
9
10
7.
l1
Iiabilities, to itself, to any third party or to MARB, or the Forest Service, or its
employees under this agreement or aly activities carried out under authority ol
this agreement.
ln light of the provisions ofSection 895.2 of the Govemment Code ofthe State of
California imposing certain tort liability jointly upon public entities solely by
reason of such entities being parties to an agreement (as defined in Section 895 of
said Code), each of the TASK FORCE AGENCIES hereto, pursuant to the
authorization contained in Sections 895.4 and 895.6 of said Code, shall assume
the full liability imposed upon it or any of its officers, agents, or empioyees by
law for injury caused by any act or omission occurring in the perfotmance ofthis
AGREEMENT to the same extenl tha! such liability would be imposed in the
absence of Section 895.2 of said Code. To achieve the above stated purpose, each
of the TASK FORCE ACENCIES indemnifies, defends, and holds harmless each
other TASK FORCE AGENCY for any liability, cost, or expense that may be
imposed upon such other TASK FORCE AGENCY solely by virnre ol said
Section 895.2, The provisions of Section 2'178 of the California Civil Code are
made a part hereofas if incorporated herein.
MARB and the Forest Sewice, as agencies of the federal government, are unable
to indemnify or hold harmless any other TASK FORCE AGENCY for any
liability arising under this agreement. MARB and the Forest Service expressly do
not indemnify or hold harmless any TASK FORCE AGENCY for any injuries or
liabilities, to itelf, to any third party or to MARB or Forest Service or their
employees under this agreement or any activities carried out under authority of
this agreement. Tort liability for federal employees, including employees of
MARB and Forest Service, is expressly authorized and limited by the Federal
Tort Claims Act, which will control liability of MARB and the Forest Service and
their employees under the terms of this agreement.
All obligations of CALTRANS under the terms of this AGREEMENT are subject
to the appropriation of the resources by the Legislature and the allocation o{'
resources by the Califomia Transportation Commission, This AGR-EEMENT has
been written before ascertaining the availability of Federal or State Iegislativ€
appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of the TASK FORCE AGENCIES
in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would occur if the AGREEMENT
were executed after that determination was made. This AGREEMENT is valid
ard enforceable as to CALTRANS as if sufficient funds have been made available
to CAL TRANS by the United States Govemment or Califomia State Legislature
for the purposes set forth in this AGREEMENT. If the United States Govemment
or the Califomia State Legislature does not appropriate sufficient funds for
CALTRANS to participate in this AGREEMENT, this AGREEMENT may be
amended in writing by the TASK FORCE AGENCIES to reflect any agreed-upon
reduction in the percentage of funds contributed by CALTRANS to continue its
participation in this AGREEMENT. CALTRANS, however, has the option to
withdrarv from this AGREEMENT in the event sufficient funds are not
appropriated for CAL TRANS. Should CALTRANS exercise its oprion ro
withdraw from this AGREEMENT, CALTRANS shall remain responsible for its
l3
12
13.
t4
15
16
share of liabiliry, if any, incurred while participating in this AGREEMENT.
No TASK FORCE AGENCY shall have a financial obligation to any other TASK
FORCE AGENCY under this AGREEMENT, except as expressly provided
herein.
Any notices, invoices, repofts, corespondence, or other communication
concerning this AGREEMENT shall be directed to the TASK FORCE AGENCY
REPRESENTATIVE on file with the TASK FORCE ADMINISTRATOR, except
that any TASK FORCE AGENCY may change its name or address by giving the
other TASK FORCE AGENCIES at least ten days written notice of the new name
or address.
The TASK FORCE AGENCIES are, and shall at all times remain as to each
other, wholly independent entities. No TASK FORCE AGENCY to this
AGREEMENT shall have power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on
behalf of any other TASK FORCE AGENCY unless expressly provided to the
contrary by this AGREEMENT. No employee, agent, or officer of a TASK
FORCE AGENCY shall be deemed for any purpose whatsoever to be an agent,
employee or officer of another TASK FORCE AGENCY,
This AGREEMENT shall be governed by, interpreted under and constmed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Califomia, except as to the
Forest Service and the March Air Reserve Base to whom federal law is
applicable.
If any provision of this AGREEMENT shall be determined by any court to be
invalid, illegal or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this
ACREEMENT shall not be affected and this AGREEMENT shall be construed as
if the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this
AGREEMENT,
Each individual TASK FORCE AGENCY has been represented by its own
separate counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this AGREEMENT.
Accordingly, this AGREEMENT shall be construed according to its fair language
and any ambiguities shall not be resolved against the drafting TASK FORCE
AGENCY.
Each of the persons signing below on behalf of a TASK FORCE AGENCY
represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to sign this AGREEMENT on
behalf of such TASK FORCE AGENCY.
21. Duration of This AGREEMENT shall terminate June 30, 2010
(unless extended by mutual agreement of all TASK FORCE ACENCIES),
provided that all debts and liabilities of the TASK FORCE are satisfied.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, each TASK FORCE AGENCY reserves the right
t4
t7.
18
19.
20
This AGREEMEN I shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the
respective successors, heirs. and assigns ofeach TASK FORCE AGENCY.
22.
23.
24.
to withdraw from the TASK FORCE at any time, upon sixty (60) days' prior
written notice to the TASK FORCE. TASK FORCE contingency, projects and
studies underway at the time of withdrawal shail continue to be fully funded by
the withdrawing TASK FORCE AGENCY until the end of the fiscal year in
which the TASK FORCE AGENCY gave notice to withdraw.
Counterpafis. This AGREEMENT may be executed simultaneously or in any
number ofcounterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Amendment. This AGREEMENT may not be amended except in a writing
signed by all the TASK FORCE AGENCIES.
Effective Date This AGREEMENT shall become effective when it has been
executed by all of the TASK FORCE AGENCIES
l5
IN \\TTNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled 'AGREEMENT TO
FORM TI{E LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE"
CITY OF IIEMET
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ffi*l^^-[\ A-rt-
Stephdn Clayton, Ciqv @rt Eric Cit-v Attomey
t6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE"
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
FOREST SERVICE (SAN BERNARDINO AND CLEVELAND
NATIONAL FOREST MANAGIiMENT ZONES)
BY
TITLE Forest CI orest
DATE June 19, 2006
APPROVE,D AS TO FORM
By
Attorney
t7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreernent entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE"
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
FOREST SERVICE (SAN BERT\ARDINO NATIONAL FOREST
MANAGEMENT ZONE)
BY
TITLE
DATE
tv
'7
1'7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement entitled.,AGREEMENT TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL
TASK FORCE"
N{ARCH JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
BY:
TlTLE:
DATE:Seotember 20. 2006
APPROVED TO RM
By,
Attorney
STATE OF Califomia )
County of Riverside
On September 20. 2006 before me,Carev L. Allen. Notarv Public , personally
appeared A Rizzo
personally known to me
! proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the persone) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that heAhelthoy executed the same in hisAe#their authonzed
capacity(s), and that by hisAe#the+r signalure(€) on the instrument the person6} or the
entity upon behalf ofwhich the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal
Si o Public
or
Commblton * la96l27
Nolory Publc . Colttornto
ltuortda County
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled..AGREEMENT TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL
TASK FORCE''
US AIR FORCE (MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE)
BY
K. BARNSON, Col, USAFR
TITLE Commander
DArE Jt,L 6 20rtc
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By
CHRIST P B ENNETT, Maj, USAF
TITLE Staff Judge Advocate
DATE JUL 6 2OO[
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAK-E TMDL TASK FORCE"
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TR.ANSPORTATION
BY
T]TLE
DATE
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By
a_
20
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE"
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
BY
TiTLE
D -7
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By
Attomey
2t
t/
l
lN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE"
ET,SINOR-E, VALLEY MUNICIPAL DISTRICT
BY
TITLE General M
DATE Jul 20065
APPROVED AS TO o
By
22
IN WITNESS WHER-EOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CA].IYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE,'
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
BY
TITLE Anthonv J. Pack.eral Manager
DATE
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By
Attomev
23
{)v
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Pa(ies havs executed this Agreement entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE"
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY AGRICULTURE COALITION
BY
AL
'?,6*ffia
TITLE
DATE Hl"r-o {9, zod-e
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By
Attome v
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE''
RECOMMEND VAL
RIVERSIDE COfNTV FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSDRVATION DISTRICT
B By
WARREN D. WILLIAMS
General Manager-Ch ief Engineer
MARION ASHLEY, Chairman
Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM ATTEST:
JOE S. RANK NANCY ROMERO
rtsel Clerk of.Board
IIUFF
Deputy County Counsel
Deputy
(SEAL)
25
AUGze2006lt,l
ill
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreemenr entitled ,,AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE''
COIINTY OF IUVtrRSIDE
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
By By 3&kr-
LARRY PARzuSH
County Executive Officer'
APPROYED AS TO FORM
JOE S. RANK
ounse
1.
VID H.K. HUFF
Deputy County Counsel
CIerk of
Deputy
(sEAL)
//
26
lr^nornnnll.q
fl
ilt
BOB BUSTE& Chairman
Riverside County Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
NANCY ROMERO
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE"
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BY
Mayor
DATE Noi/ 2l'Zd)b
APPROVED AS TO tu\I
By
City v
27
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have execured this Agreemenr enritled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE''
CITY OF CANYON I,AKE
BY
DATE rblo 6
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By
City ey
28
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreemenr entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE''
CITY OF'LAKE EI,SINO
BY
Mayor
DATE
ATTEST:
ty Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By
C Attomey
2-70{
29
Ilt{ WITNESS WHEREOF, the Pa ies have executed this Agreement entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE"
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
BY
Bonnie Flickinger, Mayor
DATE h^l^4 11,?-oabv '-)
B
ATTEST
lCe City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By '//ilr* I
Bob Henick, City Attorney
30
le
,(e a
:48
t uol 01 sv olnouddv
c&c
1 :1Sf II-V
9002 '9 raqualdas 3I.VC
o^Ey!
8
vrStHunw lo .^llS
,,3C801
)svl rot/ll Svvl NoINVC ONV fUNOlSlf f)V] 3H1 l/\UOj O.l- INf |/\33UCV,,
patlrlue luauaerov srr.ll palncaxo a^Eq sarued aql '.loSulHA ss3Nll^ Nl
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKETMDLTASK FORCE"
CITY OF PERRIS
q
Date:t3 Ub
Daryl R. B Ma
ATTEST:
Jud II ghney, City C k
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
/*t,
Eric L. Dunn, City Attorney
32
/^,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF', the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled "AGREEMENT
TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE"
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
BY M
Bradley J son, City Manager
DATE August 7, 2006
Attest:
e erk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Bv 3r""-*,- 4.DLhe,,--
D.Vt city Attomey
o
33
IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled ,.AGREEMENT TO
FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE"
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
BY
Mayor
DATE
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By
ity
34
st
90/9/9
\8d
Mc:n3f
lasu le6el
aOrof
--_<2 ,(g
aArincexS
llnee 'I plerec
:I.VC A8
ouvos'rouJ.Noc ALt'tvno
u3-tvM'rvNotc:tu vNv vJ.Nvs
,,3380J ySVl'tCl/\l- 3)\rl NOANVC ONV fUONIS]f f yvt
=H-Lyluol O.j_ lN3n=IUoV,, pellr1ue lueuearEV srqt petncexe e^eq ser!ed aq] ,lO3Uf HM SSSNI|M Nl
q
0
y\uor 01 sv c3nouddv
1
Attachment A - Lake Elsinore & Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDL Task Force
lmplementation Schedule and Budget
Fl.c.l Y..r : July 1 - Jun. :(|
FY 200847 : 18 Mofllh Bdg€t startlng Jan 1, 2006
lr
tb
lc
ld
'to
'fi
tg
th
lt
1l
1k
'lt
2
2a
2b
2c
3
3.
3b
3c
3d
3a
Noles:
R
o
s
I
C
x
E
A
G
Summary ' T.3l ForE. IMOL lmpl€m.nt.taon audget Ph.s. lB I Elnph!.a! on ln-1.k. Proc.lt.g
FlrcslYelr 200647 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
I 679,300Rsqulrs.l Ta3ks Bud9€t I 4s4.200 , 417 I 477,300
Opuonal Study Budg.r a 39,900 a 13.1,700 t 160-0fi)
TMOL Complianc. Expert Budg€t I 110,000 I 8s,000 I 83,000 3 85.000
Eslim.ted AnnualTMOL lmplom.nt Oon Buclgst $ 928,0tX)I 739,700 t 748,100 i 628,'t00
$ 972,600 I 7E2,900TMOL Audgst i 79,1.!00 s 66t,300
TllilOL lmpLrn nt.tlon Eudgst(grant tunding adiust€d)I 882,600 I 782,S00 3 794,300 I 65a,300
TMDL lmpl.mntitlon Budg€r (h-Klnd S.rvlco Adjusted)I 688,6q)i 595,900 s 587,300 I 577,300
TMDL llhpl.m.nlatbn Audg€t (star€hold.r crsdlt.dlustod)I 400.600 t 474,700 I 507,800 $ 397,800
Stalsholdcr Funding I Creditr Pha5e lS : Empha.lt on ln.Lai. Procors.r
Firc.lYoar 2005{7 2007-08 2008{9 2009-10
ln.Kind Ssrvlc.s Shars Pharo lB: Emph'3ls on ln.Lrk. Procari€i
Fl3crlY6ar 2006-t)7 2007-08 200&09 2009-10Stakohold.r
Requrcd TMOL Task Fo.cs Funded Efo(s
OptrooalfMDL Task Forc6 Fun@d Eflorts
lndependently Funded TMDL Tasks (no slakohotder S c.edir)
TMOL Complranco Exp€n
Cr\Oocumonts and Senjng3vnad€D€3ktop\Final Atl A Fnl02 09 06 IMDL Matrk6/9/2006
R
I o
E
3 98,800 I 65,800 a 65,800Task Forc. Admtnisl.ation Budgor , Es,EOO
cConlhg.rcy(,r0it ol Btrd!.t-h Kind.Ci.dllr)I {4.600 I a3,150 t 48.t80 I 15.160
Avrilibl. Gr.nt Fundlng t (90.000)3 t
5 (r9.ir00)I (8r,0001
I (288.0001 t (221,2001Applicabls Stakoholcler a cr.drrs
{87
si
5
SEkeholde, Funded lrv!Dl Iasks (stakehold6r S credrl er'grbte)
Stakeholder In.Kinds Soa/rces (statehotder
Slakeholde. Conrmgonr/ Funds
TMOL Adml.nslrabon
GlantFundrE
s
S5
a
3
s
tIoLll Srr*6holdor Credirg
Lk Elslnord Compwaler MqtAgrmt Fundrnq C.edns
rvls4 Croditt i
I
I
I
t (11
t(
RCFC&WCO IIMoL compllrnco Erp.d I (2s,0001
RCFCswCO lPh.ss 2 stresm caugo OaM I | (77 a(n t (77
I^"."rrr- ltr"u. ,"*" ln.Flow & Srrrg. Outflow R.lErlo.rhrpr
USFS ls B Forest Narurar Brcrsround Stu.,y t (15.000)$ (10,000 ! (10.000!t fi0.000
Total St ieholdor Credll.3 (87,00(
4
4b
ad
4t
ag
4h
4
1i
4t
4t
4p
itq
4t
4t
au
4r
4y
42
4rb
4.d
Tast Du6Deta'l.d Task Forco TMDL lmpl.mntatiod T.3k
2008-09 2009-10
t 20,000 R4.0 9udg.t, Sch.du{. and Agr..meht
Govsrnanc€ Stlucturo.
I 15,0q)$ 15.m0 $ 15,000I ao,000 RNutrl.nt W.t r Qullity Uonllorlng O!tab.s.
tl.n.g6m..rt lnd Af, null R.pori
3 293.067 3 173.300 i 173,300 t r73,100 RPh.s. 1 - Watersho&wido Montorinq
S
I
2006-10 E 32,300 g 32,300 RWat6rshod onltorlng aod Lab t 32,300 I 32,100
4.11
4.1
41
4.1
4-1
t r,{4,375 I 1t5,500 3 115,500 $ 115,500Phas. I - Lak. Elslno.i Nutrl.nl Monlto.lng
4.21 s
I 103,500 s 103,500Phas6 I - Canyon Lako Ndrl6nt Monitonng t s0,000 t 103,500 K
G4.31
l1-Oec-08 t 40,0004Uonitoring Study - Loc.l Ory.we.th.r Runoll Flow.
tnd Wd..Ouallly o
!l'Oec-08 I rg,qm I 19.900Ev.lu.ll,on of lFl.k. Proi.ct |tluli.nt R.drctlon o
4.51 S
5.0 Agrr
oata x
6.0 x
7.0 1-Aug-05 x
8o I
lncorporate ForestSaNic6 Nutrlonl Maflagem.nt
Oat. inlo TIVOL Task Fo.c6 Effort x
31-MaF07 I 16,900 t 16.90090LaIa Etslnora h-Lrka Sadnl.nl Nrtrlant RadGOon
Pl.n R
9.01 S
91 S.dlrmnl l{ut 6nt Flur A Oryg.n Demand Study ot I 4,800 o
9.11
100 Canyoo L!k6 In.Lat. S.dlt|.lll Trtatm.nt
Evelu.Uon :1-lUrr-07 $ 20,000 R
101 Sedim.nl otrlont FluI t Oxyg.n O.m.nd Sludy of 3l-M.r-07 I 20,000 o
't10 Lak6 Modelang Pran
rsh6d and Canyon L.I. and Laka El3inor.ln-31-lUar.07 3 40,000 R
111 Lale Model Updatss
rch€cl and Canyon Lrko and Laka ElElnoro ln'30-Jun-09 s 70,000 I i40,000 o
30.Jun.09Update of SCAG Lrnd U..I 20,000 o
Cloocumenls and Satlingsvnads\Deskbp\Final Alt A Fol02 0g 06 TMOL Metrl,(6/912006
Phr6.18 : Emph$lt on ln-l. ta Proceata3
2006-r0
2005-06PhEsr I . u/ato6had.wido Monrion.g
Ms4 r{ndod Phlro I srr.am gtug. C}&M
Phas€ 2 str.an g.ugs O&tlRCf,CaWCD
W.r Y.ar lry.t.rih€d{ldo Monito.in9 (vv.dhrr
4t R
Ph.id I .l :r. Er<lmm Ndn.nr
1:
s 5 i
I I 171
,(
s
! (154,lf7 i
I3 (1r(5(1
Cmyon Ltta tvarLr( onltoalnq
2006.r0
2006n0
2006-r0
t {r9,900)$ (20,000
1t l
lncorpordts on-Sits oispol'l Syst€ms t{utri.nt
Managament Data lntoIMOLTast Forcr Etrort
1l I
lnco.porato Urban OlschargeG Nutrisnl Manag.rnenl
o.ta rflto TiloL Task Forc6 Effon
ln-Lake SEd R.d PlarEVt/twD t i
2005-10
30-S6p-07
1-Oct-o6
30-Sep07
2006-10
2006n0 ! (4.800S€d Tro.r Srudy S
2006-01h.L.le S6d- Tronm.nt SrudyG.ani
iiut. flu. tnd O Oem.,ld StudyGrrnl
112
iI
L
I
I
31.1urr.07
i
I
30.Jun49
!
I
1zl
4r9
iLh
4!l
12.0 Pollui6nl Tr.dlng Optlons Plan ro.s.e-07 | | t 60 000 3 20,000 R
13.0 Rovlow End R€vis. Nutnent W.tsr Quallty Obloctlvls 31-o.c{e I i I 20,000 R
14.0 Roviow of IMOL VLA./LA ,.^."rrli 5 20,000 R
Ttlh Audgett Estimatos taken from TMDL Monitoring Rsporl pr6per6d by TslraTech, lnc
Task funded by Slsksholder Contln96n6y Funds
ClDocumonl! and Sottngsvharig\D8sklop\FlnBl Att A FnDz m 06 TMDL M6trix6/9/2006
a (20,000il-losvstoo
lo,rflo*
RCFC&IYCD
ln.Klnd
MyEtc leko ln.Flow and Stage 200s08 I
ll 200t2010 t JI s (10,000 IltsFs tn.x,^dl5.o Bi,o N.r Fo..!t fl.tural
IB.ck9round Siudy I (r0 ro0
5
5a
5b
5c
5d
5€
5f
59
5h
5i
5i
5k
5t
6
6a
Slak€hold€r Cost Altocation
{grant f undins rdjusted)
l02008-09 20
lll s rg::oo s 201./l{)0 s 200,700 $ 156,100M54 Co.P.rmittees ffotal)lll'TBD
TBOlll I 3,3,6 TAD
City ot Canyon Lat.I
t
t
$
5
$
$
$14.732
25,424
2,323
8,692
16,829
56,a13
1,000
TBD TBO TBD
TBO TBO T60
Clty ol Lake Elsinor.TBO TBD TAD
TAO
TBO TEDTAD
TBO TBO TBO
IBD rso Ta0
RCFC&WCO
! 200,700Lk Elsinore Comp Wrter Mgt Agrmt efotrl)x lll r rsr:oo s 203.400 s 165,100
El3inore Valloy Munlclprl Wrt6r Olst lll s 96,600 I 101,700 s 100,350 I 83,050
Clty of laka Elslnorc 96,600so lll s I 10t,700 s 100.350 s 83,050
t 200.700 i 166,100San Jacinto AgriculturEl Operators t 193,200 s 203,400
san Jacinto Dairy & cAFo oporators I 33,900 t 35,700 I 35,200 I 29,100
CALTRANS - freeway 3 15,000 t 10,000 ! 10,000 3 10.000
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wotlands I 1s,000 s 10,000 t 10,000 t 10,000
Eastom lVlunicipal Wat6r Oiitrict t 15,000 I 10,000 t 10,000 I 10,000
Mrrch ARB Jolnt Powers Authority 3 't0.000 3 10,000
IJS Alr Forco (March Alr Rassrve Base)I 15,000 s 10.000 3 10,000 I 10,000
I I90047500 I
Stal.holdor Cost Allocauon
(3tak.hold.r I credlta and in.klnd rdjurtld)Annual Audg.t
MS4 Co-P6rmitt6€s (Total)ll r 86,400 I 119,400 a 136,700 I 102,100
ll r 28,5e1 TBD TADTAD
ll r t!14 TBO TAO TAO
Clly ol Canyon Lak6 1,830il,TAD TAD IBO
City of Hamal 11,121ll 'TBD TAD IBO
ll r 3,862 TBD TBO TBD
CIty otMor.no V.ll.y ?5,244ll s TBO IBO 160
ll s 1,om IBO TBD TBD
Clty of Psrris ll 'TBO IBD rao
CIly ol Rlvorsid!1,032ll s f6D IBD TAD
Clty of Srn Jacinlo ll s TSD TBO laD
RCFC&WCO ll'
Lk Elslnoro Comp W.t6r Mgt Agrmt (Total)%trrrr,n $ 46,200 I 50.600
Elslnor. Vall€y Munlclprl Wal6r Dlst m [-:m I 23.100 I 42.600 5 25.300
Clty of lal€ Elsinorg F'I F=f.!it 3 23.100 t 42.600 I 25,300
San Jaclnto Agricultural Op.rators r-rErr,n 3 203,iO0 t 200,700 $ 16!,100
San Jacinto Oalry & CAFO Operators treE i 35,700 , 3s,200 I 29,100
CALTRANS - freeway t-@ I 10,000 a t0.000 ! 10,000
CA DF&G. San Jacinto Wotlands r-Rir,n 3 10,000 i 10,000 ! 10,000
US Fo..st Servlce Aret
Eastem Munlclpal Wator District tlrm 3 10,000 t 10,000 t 10.000
March ARB Joint PowDr! Autho.ity f-rf'r,n t 10,000 t 10.000 I 10,000
t S Air Force (March Air Rosorvo Base)t-@ t 10,000 t 10,000 I 10,000
2007
3 400,500 s 474,700 i 507,800 ! 397
II
-
IIIIIIIIIrrr
IIIIIIIIII r
II
trI@GGI@@@@fnffi{@I@I@
6b
6c
6d
6s
6f
6g
6h
6/
6k
5t
Cr\DocumenB and Setlingsvnad6\Oesktop\Fi,lal Alt A Fn[]2 09 06 TMOI Matdr6r'92006
TBO T60
TAOClty of Morlno v.llry
TBO rBD
3 97.0@ t 77,000Irre.oool r r?,ooo
50
t rs oool I ro.ooo t 10.000 I 10,000US Forest Se.vice Area
i rs,oool i ro,ooo
TAD
TBD
GIty ofLak€ Elsinore
5
t 8s,200
t t t
7
7b
7rt
7l
fg
7h
7i
fl
7k
7t
Fll
%
m
2006-07
tn:l
m
flil
r
a
F!
16
n
1
E
56
I
2007.08
621
EJ
m
tm
tril
EE
m
E.]
flil
iED
fl,
IAD
m
TAD
G
rc0
IAD
m
IEE
m
ED
tra
m
200E-09
599
r'n
m
TEE
n'l
Irs
fil
m
II:D
IE
TEE
flil
TEE
[E
im
m
[.T'
r.0
Et!
m
IE!;I
m
2009.10
m
m
fim
iif,,
ratn
fr{,
iEE
ti:r,
IEE
E'D
EE
M54 Co-Permitte€s (fobl)
US Al, Forc6 (March Air Rossfte Base)
Ma.ch ARB Joint Powers Authority
Eastem Municipal Wrt6. Oistrict
US Forest Saavice Arsa
CALTRANS - fre€way
San Jaclnto Dairy & CAFO Operators
San Jaclnlo Agricultural Opsratorc
City of Canyon Laks
CIty oa Lake Eliinorc
Clly of Moredo Vrll.y
Cily of Perris
RCFCAWCO
Lk Elsinor6 Comp Wator Mgt Agrmt (Total)
Elslnoro Valloy Munlcipal lryator Olst
City ot lak€ Elsinora
m
IE
m
t5
rrl
IE
m
rE
IE
IE
ffi
510
[n
t0
EB
tril
fto
m
FI]
m
m
to
IIIIIIIIIrIIrrr
ErrrErrrEETErr@rrr@rrrrrrr@rEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEETE
IIIIIIIIII
EEEEEE
r@rrrrrrErrrErrrErrr EilTrrrrrr
C:\Docum6nts and SetUngs\marie\Ds6htop\Final Att A Fnt02 09 06 IMOL Metix8€/2006
City ot San Jacinto
CA DF&G. San Jacinto Wetland3
Total:698