The URL can be used to link to this page

23-1348RESOLUTION NO. 23-1348 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2023 PARKS MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Menifee City Council adopted the Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan (POSTRMP) on March 16, 2016; and WHEREAS, at the March 15, 2021, Special Meeting to review the Strategic Vision priorities, it was recommended by City Council to review and update the POSTRMP to recalibrate goals and objectives based on the needs of the current Menifee residents; and WHEREAS, at the May 6, 2021, Regular Meeting, the Parks, Recreation and Trails Commission (PRTC) created a Parks Master Plan Ad Hoc Committee and requested staff provide a progress update on the objectives of the POSTRMP; and WHEREAS, at the September 2, 2021, PRTC Regular Meeting, staff presented an update indicating that 19 of the 21 POSTRMP objectives for park upgrades had been completed with the remaining in progress and over 11 new parks had added 81 acres of parkland over the last five years; and WHEREAS, at the March 16, 2022, City Council Regular Meeting, City staff retained KTUA, a professional planning consultant with over 30 years of experience, to assist with the update of the Parks Master Plan; and WHEREAS, KTUA completed a comprehensive inventory of the current park and park amenities of both City and Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District, City recreation programs, and current and future development projects to determine the 2.4 acre per 1,000 residents deficit from the 5 acre per 1,000 residents goal established by Menifee Municipal Code Chapter 7.75 Parkland Dedication and Fees; and WHEREAS, KTUA and City staff implemented a comprehensive Community Engagement plan spanning from June 2022 through December 2022, and included three Community Workshops, 11 stakeholder meetings, 800 survey respondents, social media posts reaching 40,000 users, inclusion of the Parks Master Plan Update in the Menifee Matters mailed to 37,877 homes and businesses, and recorded meetings and workshops on the City YouTube site with over 360 views; and WHEREAS, reoccurring public comments included the desire for more adult recreation opportunities, additional pickleball court amenities, splash pads and aquatics facilities, additional park and field lighting, multi -generational public facilities, and dedicated walking/hiking trails; and WHEREAS, it was also noted that 42% of respondents from the survey were unaware of which agency, City or Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District, maintained their closest park; and WHEREAS, KTUA provided recommendations in the areas of Facilities & Amenities, Programs & Services, Administrative, Financial, Trails, Connectivity & Open Space, Placemaking, and Technology; and WHEREAS, upon conclusion of the Study, the Parks Master Plan was developed to address the creation of new parks and improvements as a framework for potential Capital Improvement Program projects, priorities, funding strategies and potential costs for at least the next 10 years; and Adoption of 2023 Parks Master Plan WHEREAS, the Parks Master Plan does not fall within the definition of project pursuant to the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, as a narrative document, the Parks Master Plan does not have the potential to result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment per Section 15378(a) and is an administrative activity of the City per Section 15378(b)(5); and WHEREAS, the Parks Master Plan was reviewed and recommended for City Council adoption by PRTC at the May 4, 2023, Regular Meeting; and WHEREAS, the Parks Master Plan was made available for public review from April 10 — May 10, 2023, with feedback incorporated into the final draft; and WHEREAS, City Council reviewed and provided additional feedback for incorporation into the final draft of the Parks Master Plan at the May 31, 2023, Special Meeting; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Parks Master Plan does not fall within the definition of a project under CEQA and does not have the potential to result in in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment per Section 15378(a) and is an administrative activity of the City per Section 15378(b)(5). Section 2. The Parks Master Plan is consistent with goals and policies of the City's adopted General Plan, specifically with the Land Use, Housing, Circulation, Open Space and Design, and Community Design Elements. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Menifee approves the Parks Master Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2023 Bill Zim er , Mayor Attest: *ep1Qq-nie oseen, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Jeffre . rMee��Iching, City Attorney Adoption of 2023 Parks Master Plan EXHIBIT A Please see the 2023 Parks Master Plan Rgp�SC MEN1FEI A - - s.�- '-r . � - - —��r, ��,,, -•y r. Ica ,:4 � -- . ' , ' r::-..�t. � t _ _.. • -ate _ _ �.� ti' �G. -.! �Al CITY OF MENIFEE PARK MA TE PLAN DULY 2023 A&Neve. MENIFEE Set ter. Boil. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CITY COUNCIL Bill Zimmerman, Mayor Bob Karwin, Mayor Pro Tem, District 1 Ricky Estrada, Councilmember, District 2 Lesa Sobek, Councilmember, District 3 Dean Deines, Councilmember, District 4 PARKS, RECREATION, AND TRAILS COMMISSION Bill Ackerman, Chair David Foust, Vice Chair Scott Bangle, Commissioner Tierra Bowen, Commissioner William Payne, Commissioner Jonathan Nicks, Deputy City Manager Mariana Mitchell, Community Services Manager Bryce Howell, Park/Landscape Maintenance Manager Kori Jones, Senior Management Analyst KTUA Joe Punsalan, Principal Mike Singleton, Principal (Retired) Matt Wilkins, Project Manager Nicole Rogge, Planner MATRIX Alan Pennington, Principal Analyst Chas Jordan, Senior Analyst Khushboo Hussain, Senior Analyst RRC Kailyn Haskovec, Survey Manager MENIFEE 'fi: New. Better. Best. matrixta consulting group RRC A S 5 0 G I A T E 5 11 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary............................................................................. 7 Whythis Plan is Important............................................................................................................................................ 8 Recommendations............................................................................................................................................................10 Scopeof the Project.........................................................................................................................................................12 61,1.- Planning Context................................................................................13 Historyof Menifee.............................................................................................................................................................14 Department of Community Services Overview.................................................................................................16 PreviousPlanning History.............................................................................................................................................16 2023-2028 Strategic Plan..............................................................................................................................................17 Policies and Guidance from Other Studies..........................................................................................................19 Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District Overview.......................................................................................22 HOACommunities............................................................................................................................................................ 24 Existing Conditions............................................................................. 27 WhereAre We Now?....................................................................................................................................................... 28 DemographicProfile........................................................................................................................................................28 ParkClassifications..........................................................................................................................................................30 ACloser look at Menifee's Parks............................................................................................................................... 34 A Closer Look at Valley -Wide Parks in Menifee................................................................................................. 36 Descriptionsof Existing City Parks..........................................................................................................................38 Levelof Service..................................................................................................................................................................46 ComparativeAnalysis......................................................................................................................................................48 MenifeeSchools................................................................................................................................................................. 50 Adjacent Parks and Recreation Facilities.............................................................................................................. 52 Trails, Bike Infrastructure, and Park Connections............................................................................................. 54 GeographicDistribution Analysis.............................................................................................................................54 ProgramOverview and Analysis...............................................................................................................................63 Financial Conditions of Existing Park and Recreation Facilities...............................................................67 National, Regional, and Local Recreation Trends............................................................................................. 69 i Community Priorities and Needs ...................................................... 73 OutreachOverview........................................................................................................................... 74 OutreachStrategy.............................................................................................................................................................74 Communityand Stakeholder Input..........................................................................................................................76 StakeholderInterviews...................................................................................................................................................76 CommunitySurvey...........................................................................................................................................................78 CommunityWorkshops..................................................................................................................................................82 CommunityEngagement Key Trends..................................................................................................................... 84 TABLE OF CONTENTS III TABLE OF CONTENTS Future Conditions................................................................................85 Adding New Facilities and Amenities for a Growing Population.............................................................. 86 Future Population -Based Service Analysis.......................................................................................................... 86 PlannedPark Projects.....................................................................................................................................................90 FuturePopulation..............................................................................................................................................................92 FutureLevel of Service Needs.................................................................................................................................... 94 Future Population Based Service Analysis...........................................................................................................96 Potential Opportunity Park and Community Center Sites...........................................................................99 FuturePartnerships..........................................................................................................................................................99 Potential Trails, Park Connections, and Open Space......................................................................................101 Recommendations...........................................................................105 Recommendations That Will Help Menifee Plan for the Future................................................................106 Programsand Services..................................................................................................................................................112 Administration.....................................................................................................................................................................116 Financial.................................................................................................................................................................................118 Trails, Connectivity, and Open Space......................................................................................................................120 Placemaking.........................................................................................................................................................................122 Technology............................................................................................................................................................................123 PotentialInfill Opportunity Areas..............................................................................................................................124 InfillAmenity Opportunity Areas...............................................................................................................................126 Potential Future LOS Scenario...................................................................................................................................128 IV CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN LIST OF FIGURES Figure2-1: Study Area...............................................................................................................................................................15 Figure2-2: Existing Land Use(2021).................................................................................................................................23 Figure 2-3: HOA Communities and Facilities................................................................................................................ 25 Figure3-1: Racial and Ethic Makeup.................................................................................................................................28 Figure 3-2: Demographic Data Summary.......................................................................................................................29 Figure 3-3: Menifee Population Growth Trends...........................................................................................................29 Figure 3-4: Existing Park Types and Locations............................................................................................................ 33 Figure3-5: Comparative Analysis Cities.........................................................................................................................48 Figure3-6: Menifee Schools..................................................................................................................................................51 Figure 3-7: Existing Trails and Pedestrian/Bike Access to Parks....................................................................... 55 Figure 3-8:1/2 and 2-Mile Travelsheds with Existing Residential Use.............................................................57 Figure 3-9: Existing Parks with Playgrounds................................................................................................................ 58 Figure 3-10: Existing Parks with Sport Courts.............................................................................................................. 59 Figure 3-11: Existing Multi -purpose Fields......................................................................................................................60 Figure3-12: Existing Diamond Fields................................................................................................................................61 Figure3-13: Existing Community Centers......................................................................................................................62 Figure 3-14: Parks and Programming Revenue Streams........................................................................................67 Figure 3-15: Estimated Sport Participation in Menifee.............................................................................................70 Figure 3-16: Estimated Recreational Activity Participation In Menifee, CA...................................................70 Figure3-17: Generations..........................................................................................................................................................71 Figure 3-18: Nationwide Generational Recreational Activity Participation....................................................72 Figure 4-1: Community Engagement Timeline.............................................................................................................74 Figure 4-2: Most Visited Park Facilities............................................................................................................................80 Figure 4-3: Visitors likeness to use trails and pedestrian connections if they were developed?....... 80 Figure 4-4: The importance of facilitates and services offered by City of Menifee Parks......................80 Figure 4-5: Facilitates and Services Importance/Needs Met Matrix Summary .......................................... 81 Figure 4-6: Facilities and Services Importance/Needs Met Matrix...................................................................81 Figure 5-1: Future Residential Land use with Existing Parks................................................................................88 Figure 5-2: Future Residential Land use and Future and Existing Parks.......................................................89 Figure 5-3: Future Residential Development and Future Parks..........................................................................93 Figure 5-4: Existing Park Pressure (2020 population)..............................................................................................97 Figure 5-5: Future Park Pressure (2035 population).................................................................................................98 Figure 5-6: Potential Parcels for Future Proposed Park and Community Center Infill ............................100 Figure 5-7: Potential Park Connections, Non -vehicular Trails, and Open Space........................................103 Figure 6-1: Financial Revenues and Expenses for Parks and Recreation of the 2023 Fiscal Year ..... 118 Figure 6-2: Overlapping Amenity Gaps with Potential Infill Opportunity Areas.........................................125 Figure6-3: Opportunity Areas..............................................................................................................................................126 Figure 6-4: Potential Future Scenario Park Travelsheds.........................................................................................129 TABLE OF CONTENTS V LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1: Classified Existing Parks with Associated Acres.................................................................................30 Table 3-2: City-wide Park Amenity Inventory..............................................................................................................35 Table 3-3: Valley -Wide Park Amenity Inventory.........................................................................................................37 Table 3-4: City-wide Park Assessment Scores...........................................................................................................38 Table 3-5: Existing Level of Service(2022)...................................................................................................................46 Table 3-6: Level of Service Current Population (NRPA Averages)..................................................................47 Table 3-7: Comparative analysis with southern California cities.......................................................................48 Table 3-8: Amenity Comparative Analysis....................................................................................................................49 Table 3-9: Categorized Park Level of Service..............................................................................................................56 Table 3-10: Top Fifteen Activities Totals by Registrant Numbers(2021-2022)............................................64 Table 3-11: Top Fifteen Programs Totals by Registrant Numbers (2022-2023, as of March 2023)....64 Table 3-12: Program Offerings from Southern California Recreation and Parks Organizations ........ 65 Table 3-13: Cultural Arts Programs from Other Recreation Organizations...................................................66 Table 3-14: Programmatic Specific Cost Recovery...................................................................................................68 Table 3-15: Nationwide Team Sport Participation Trends....................................................................................69 Table 5-1: Future Level of Service (2035) Existing and Planned Parks..........................................................86 Table 5-2: Future Amenity Level of Service (2035) Existing and Planned Parks......................................87 Table 5-3: Level of Service Adjustment Table.............................................................................................................94 Table 5-4: Future Level of Service Table with Adjustment....................................................................................95 Table 6-1: Infill Amenities for Nova Park Opportunity Areas................................................................................126 Table 6-2: Infill Recommendations Table.......................................................................................................................127 Table 6-3: Future Scenario Amenity Level of Service (2035).............................................................................128 Table 6-4: Future Scenario Level of Service (2035).................................................................................................130 VI CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Executive Summary INTRODUCTION WHY THIS PLAN IS IMPORTANT The Menifee Parks Master Plan (Master Plan) helps set the vision for the City's park and recreational services for the next decade. According to The Hill, the City of Menifee is the seventh fastest growing city in the nation based on population increases in 2022. Furthermore, the City is anticipating growing by over 17,000 residents by 2035, according to a review of future planned residential development. With this level of growth, proper planning for the City's park and recreation system is crucial. The City completed a parks master plan in 2016. Much of this plan has been implemented and is a major accomplishment, however, the need for additional park planning is imperative considering the expected growth. This growth provides city residents with great economic opportunities and benefits, and it poses a unique set of challenges to ensure the City is provid- ing park and recreation needs for residents in all areas of the City. Creating new recreational opportunities where new growth is occurring and maintaining and updating existing parks and recreational facilities will be critical. Key Issues and Reoccurring Themes Issues regarding parks, recreation facilities, and programs were identified using various methods of input. These issues include; a review of existing plans and documents, stakeholder meetings, inventory of existing facilities, a statistically -valid and open -link survey, level of service analysis, and various community work- shops and presentations. A summary of the information gathered from these sources can be found in Chap- ter 4 and Appendix A. V7 Silver Star Park Sign 8 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN AM The major issues and findings of this study include: Community Survey » Trails, pathways, and open spaces are rated the highest in terms of importance. Respondents feel strongly about adding walking trails/interpretive trails and more splashpads/ spraygrounds in the next five years. 42 percent of respondents indicated they are un- aware what agency manages their closest park. 21 percent of respondents live in an HOA com- munity. Stakeholder Interviews Desire to combine Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District (Valley -Wide) into the City park sys- tem. Park and field lighting is needed. Explore aquatic play elements at various parks. Consider multi -generational facilities. Incorporate accessible features at playground and facilities throughout the City. Summary of Program Analysis The top three most popular programs in the 2021- 2022 program year were Senior Soul Line Dance, Taekwondo, and Texas Hold'Em. The top three most popular programs in the 2022-2023 program year were Texas Hold 'Em, Fitness, and Tiny Tots Program. Compared to nearby cities, the City is lacking in aquatics programs, due to the lack of aquatic facilities, although many HOAs in Menifee have swimming pools. According to National Recreation and Park Associ- ation (NRPA) (national averages), the City of Meni- fee is below average in: Swimming pools Splashpads/spraygrounds Multi -purpose fields Lighted multi -purpose fields Tennis courts Volleyball courts EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 RECOMMENDATIONS After analyzing the findings, community and stake- holder input, inventory of existing facilities, level of service analysis, and analysis of future recreation trends, a series of recommendations were devel- oped to guide the improvement of Menifee's parks, recreation facilities, and programs. The project rec- ommendations are organized into three goals: In- clude, Integrate, and Improve. These broad goals help to organize the overall strategies for the project. Goals and strategies represent ideas that have evolved from the beginning of the work effort and have been influenced by public input, level of ser- vice analysis, and other factors. These broad goals and strategies identify objectives and actions which have further fiscal planning impacts, oper- ational budget impacts, and timelines to complete. The recommendations can be found in more detail in Chapter 6. INCLUDE : --- 9 __3 Programs and vices Administrative A 8 4 / FinancialDY t**r INTEGRATE 5 AN Trails, Connectivity, and Open Space L GLOSSARY OF TERMS The following terms are utilized throughout the re- port and the definitions to these terms are below: Active recreation: Structured individual or team activity that requires the use of special facilities, courses, fields, or equipment. Amenity: A physical element that accommodates a recreational activity or sport. Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA): A non-profit or- ganization that delivers quality assurance and improvement to accredited park and recreation organizations throughout the country by helping them build a comprehensive management system of operational best practices. Facility: The built features within parks that cre- ate opportunities to engage in specific games and activities. These can range from single courts or small play areas up to the recreation centers which support a wide variety of self -directed and pro- grammed recreation. Infill: Areas of open space within existing parks that are suitable for potential development or new amenities. Infill areas can also indicate vacant land that is not currently a park that is suitable for new park development in the future. Multi -use trail: A designated pathway that accom- modates various modes of active transportation. It is designed to be accessible to a wide range of us- ers, including pedestrians, cyclists, joggers, skat- ers, and sometimes even equestrians. Multi -use trails are separate from vehicular traffic and pro- vide a safe and scenic environment for people to engage in non -motorized activities. Natural habitat: Native or naturalized plant com- munities and natural features such as woodlands, riparian corridors, and varied undeveloped land- scape, including but not limited to all areas des- ignated as environmentally sensitive habitat areas (ESHA) in the General Plan. National Park and Recreation Association (NRPA) national averages: Amenity standards based on the 2020 Agency Performance Review Survey. 10 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Open space: Any area of land that is essentially unimproved and designated for one or more of the following open space uses; (1) land for the preser- vation of natural resources; (2) land for the man- aged production of resources; (3) open space for outdoor recreation; (4) open space for public health and safety; and (5) protection of Native American cultural sites, including burial, historic or archaeo- logical, sacred, or other cultural sites. Park: Public land for passive or active recreation. Passive natural area: Areas designated for passive recreation where minimal stress impacted the site's resources. Passive recreation: Recreational activities that do not require constructed facilities like sports fields or pavilions. Spirit Park Picnic Area Playground: A space designed for children to play and explore. It may include playsets, interactive panels, and protective surfacing. The types of parks are defined in detail in Chapter 3 Park Classifica- tions. Level of Service (LOS): A qualitative measure to relate the quantity of park facilities. This measure- ment evaluates how parks, open spaces, and facili- ties serve the given community. Geographic Distribution Analysis (GDA): Exam- ines the walktime, biketime, and drivetime to the parks and open spaces within the City as deter- mined by a GIS parkshed analysis. Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District (Val- ley -Wide): A parks district that owns and maintains 24 parks within the City of Menifee and a total of 80 parks in the entire district. The District was created when Menifee was an unincorporated area of the County of Riverside. These parks were not trans- ferred to the City when Menifee incorporated. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 SCOPE OF THE PROJECT The scope of the Master Plan encompasses a sum- mary of the existing planning efforts, an inventory of all parks and amenities, an assessment of the current standards, projections of future conditions, input from the community, and recommendations to the City. The Master Plan sets the future direction of the parks, playgrounds, and portions of parks and open space with improved facilities in the City of Menifee's parks system. Overview of the Document Executive Summary: The executive summary pro- vides an overview of the entire document, identifies key issues and themes within the City's park sys- tem, and provides an overview of the recommen- dations. Planning Context: The planning context gives context to the City of Menifee, the State of Califor- nia, and the United States. It provides an overview of The City's parks, recreation, and community services. It gives policies and guidance from other studies. This section describes the three different park systems, City parks, Valley -Wide parks, and HOA parks and facilities, and the impact they have on the overall park system. Existing Conditions: The existing conditions give an overview of the demographic profile of the City of Menifee. It explains the differences between mini -parks, neighborhood parks, and communi- ty parks, and categorizes each park to its respec- tive category. It lists the amenities of each park for both City parks and Valley -Wide parks. It shows the level of service of the entire park system based on NRPA (national averages) and compares the City to several other Southern California cities. It provides a series of maps that show geographically where parks are and analyzes current recreational pro- gram participation and trends. Key takeaways include: The City has a 2.4 park acre per 1,000 residents deficit citywide. The City is lacking aquatic facilities (swimming pools and splashpads). The City has high totals of program registrants. Recreational programs are very popular post COVID-19. Community Outreach: The community outreach summarizes the information gathered from the ex- tensive community engagement efforts completed throughout the entire planning process. It includes public input gathered from the three community workshops, statically -valid survey, stakeholder in- terviews, and focus group interviews. It takes com- munity's input and identifies key trends and priori- ties of the community and stakeholders. Key takeaways: There is a strong desire for a public aquatic facility. Residents would like to have more adult sports programs. Survey respondents want more trails and paths. Future Conditions: The future conditions analyzes the projected parks and facilities. It also identifies recreation trends, planned residential development and population increases in the City, and these im- pact on the future level of service. Key takeaways: Community needs adjustment shows that pick- leball courts, tennis courts, multi -purpose fields, and splashpads are the most needed amenities by the community. The increased future population will create an increased demand for more park acres. Recommendations: The recommendations identi- fy key strategies, action items, and goals to improve the existing and future level of service of parks, recreational programs, and service delivery. This chapter also identifies infill opportunities at each existing park and potential amenities that could be incorporated at an existing park. The recommenda- tions also provides potential funding opportunities to execute the goals and recommendations. Gale Webb, Kids-R41, Action Sports Park 12 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Planning Context PLANNING CONTEXT HISTORY OF MENIFEE The history of Menifee can be traced back to Native American tribes that once inhabited the area which included Luiseho tribes, specifically the Pechanga band. By the 1700's Spanish conquistadors landed in California and the area fell within the Spanish empire's rule. The area was eventually annexed into the United States from Mexico in 1850 under California's statehood. Farming was the primary land use starting in the mid-1800s. By the 1880's mining activity began with the discovery of a large quartz lode by miner Luther Menifee Wilson, which gave the City it's name. Although mining and farming were prevalent in the early 1900s, the unincorporated area didn't see much development until a major builder from Phoenix, Arizona, Del Webb, had a vision of an active retirement community and built the first major development, Sun City, in the early 1960s. Sun City can still be found near the center of the City today. On June 3, 2008, the residents of the communities encompassing the City of Menifee voted to incorporate Menifee into Riverside County's 26th city. The new City of Menifee was officially established on October 1, 2008. However, the parks administered by Valley -Wide Parks Service District did not transfer into the new City parks system but the city contracted with Valley -Wide to continue programs before opting to establish the Community Services Department in 2015. Sheep at Karakul Fur Farm on property first owned by James B. Farrell in the 1880s, now Audie Murphy Ranch. Photo from a postcard of Quail Valley Lake. It was used for boat- ing, fishing, and swimming in the 1950s. .; �? � Y V _` t � I� 3i�U• � Private pool and recreation area at the Quail Valley Country Club in the mid 1950s. The entrance to William Newport Ranch in 1905 located near present day Kay Ceniceros Center. 14 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN LAKE ELSINORE Mead Valle Good Hop, Perris Lakeview FIGURE 2-1: Study Area Nuevo i Romoland I - ' I Homel 1 idowbrook 1 I 1 � I � I I � CanyonLake --; MENIFEE 1 , Lake Elsinore 0 0 � 1 1 1 , 1 ' 1 ' 1 I I I I I / I I ❑ IA M JN U VALLEY LAKE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES OVERVIEW The City's Department of Community Services is in charge of the recreational facilities, programs, and various other service areas, except for Valley - Wide and Homeowner Association (HOA) parks. The goal of the department is to create community through people, parks and programs. The vision of the department is: We enhance residents' quality of life by delivering quality programs, services, and facilities that create lasting positive memories for youth, adults and seniors throughout the community. The Community Services Department is comprised of the following service areas: » Community outreach (committee and commission) » Facility maintenance Outreach and education of state-wide waste and recycling initiatives Park and landscape maintenance Park development/improvement » Recreation and leisure activities » Senior services » Special events » Youth programs Sports: Youth and alternative Menifee Community Services Department at construction ground -breaking of Gale Webb, Kids-R41, Action Sports Park PREVIOUS PLANNING HISTORY Following the building of Sun City in the 1960s, much of the City has followed the trend of master -planned communities. This includes the communities of The Lakes, Mariposa, Oasis, Audie Murphy Ranch, Heritage Lakes, Canyon Heights, Menifee Valley Ranch, Caider Ranch, and various other communities. Though the City has various master -planned communities, some areas within the City follow less defined, rural development patterns. Examples include Quail Valley located in the northwestern section of the City, Romoland located in the northeastern section of the City, and Bell Mountain Ranches located in the south and southwest portions of the City. The City of Menifee has been following their last Trails, Parks, Open Space, and Recreation Master Plan completed in 2016. Since then, the City has completed a number of new park projects. Presently, the City is experiencing rapid population growth and the plan is in need of an update to accommodate the new needs of the future community. Furthermore, the City is going through various planning and policy updates to help inform and manage the current growth in a sustainable and reasonable manner. Aerial view of Sun City Retirement Community during its con- struction in the mid 1960s. 16 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN 2023-2028 STRATEGIC PLAN The 2023-2028 Strategic Plan Update is a five-year plan adopted by City Council in March 2023 that serves as a foundation for the City's process, it defines the City's shared vision for the future, and focuses resources on five strategic priorities. The plan serves as a guide to align with other city ini- tiatives. It sets priorities, goals, and objectives and performance measures for government transparen- cy, accountability, and continued improvement. The five strategic priorities and how the Parks Master Plan integrates these priorities are as follows: 1. Connectivity and Mobility To provide access to parks for all ages and abili- ties, the Connectivity and Mobility priority seeks to enhance accessibility and link the communi- ty's resources with sustainable infrastructure. The City's Active Transportation Plan, which fulfills one of the objectives of this priority, addresses existing and future non -motorized access to parks, schools, retail and transit for a connected bicycle and pe- destrian network. Developing a comprehensive and connected park system allows residents to travel by foot, bicycle, or other mobility device. The identifi- cation of trails and incorporating the City's Active Transportation Plan priorities are also included into this Parks Master Plan. Strategy 5, Trails, Connec- tivity, and Open Space recommends identifying corridors for the possibility of linear parks as traffic calming measures while improving bicycle and pe- destrian connections. Technology is also a part of being connected. Strategy 7, Technology, develops strategies to increase security systems within the park system, enhance digital scheduling and facility management tools and to include virtual programs, events, and activities. 2. Unique Identity This priority aims to engage in thoughtful and col- laborative planning with stakeholders to develop a distinct sense of place that makes the City a high- ly attractive and desired destination for residents, businesses, and visitors. Throughout the planning process of this Parks Master Plan, stakeholders, residents, Councilmembers and Parks and Recre- �`� MEI��FEE A STRATEGIC PLAN 2023-2028 i' ations Commissioners were engaged to guide the plan. The City is in a unique situation where it still has the room to grow, develop and enhance exist- ing recreation infrastructure and plan parks and programs for future generations. By identifying open space, vacant properties, and listening to its residents, the Parks Master Plan looks to the future to provide its rapidly growing population the rare opportunity to shape a growing City and create its identity. Strategy 6, Placemaking provides rec- ommendations to increase identity and relation to local natural context and built environment which will assist with building upon the existing programs and events in order to create a signature event that exemplifies the City's unique identity. Strat- egy 1, Facilities and Amenities looks at different ways to leverage existing City assets for park im- provements such as addressing park poor areas, exploring amenities such as splash pads and other aquatic features and providing amenities such as multi -purpose fields and courts to accommodate sporting trends such as Pickleball. Improving park amenities, planning City events, and increasing recreational opportunities helps to make Menifee a desirable place to live. PLANNING CONTEXT 17 3. Community Engagement and Social Infrastructure The Community Engagement and Social Infra- structure priority encourages the creation of op- portunities to bring people together and enhance communication to amplify accessibility, increase awareness, and proactively deliver information to maintain quality of life. Community engagement has been a challenge since the pandemic. Many people have chosen to prioritize their time with fam- ily and friends and spend less on civic engagement. The Plan provided opportunities to bring people together at workshops, through social media, on- line resources and at City meetings to gather com- munity feedback on parks, amenities, programs, deficiencies, and opportunities to improve the park system. Strategy 3, Administration, identifies strate- gies to collaborate with the Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District to unify the park system to better serve the needs of residents. Strategy 2, Programs and Services, has strategies that look to increase and enhance programs for individuals with disabil- ities, promote gardening and local food production, and create outdoor classrooms space in parks near schools. Other recommendations include strate- gies to create, enhance and expand existing youth and teen programs, diversifying programs to in- clude special event programming and nature and environmental programs. Thriving Economy The Thriving Economy priority encourages inten- tional smart growth to support the City's business community so that residents have access to busi- nesses, housing, employment, and well -paying jobs. Planning and designing additional parks, or infill at existing parks, provides opportunities to al- low people to gather and socialize, which becomes a unique attraction to the City. The Parks Master Plan summarizes these infill areas at parks and compares them with park facility and amenity de- ficiencies. Amenities and parks can be attractive to local businesses where programs, youth sporting events and City events can drive residents and vis- itors to their businesses. Amenities such as sports fields, lighted courts and aquatic facilities can keep youth and adult sports in Menifee which supports the local economy. Strategy 2, Programs and Ser- vices, discusses exploring joint -use -agreements to utilize facilities such pools for seasonal youth and adult sports. Being able to host large youth events like soccer and baseball tournaments can provide increased annual revenue for local businesses, there must also be awareness of potential impacts on neighborhoods when large events and tourna- ments are planned. Strategy 4, Financial, empha- sizes the continuation of grant pursuits, increase sponsorships and additional funding options to maintain and create new parks and programs. Oth- er recommendations include implementation of an asset management system to identify, evaluate and manage park assets and will allow the City to be proactive in maintenance and operational needs to keep parks in good condition. 5. Safe and Vibrant Community Providing exceptional public safety and maintain- ing the City's attractive look and feel as one of the safest cities is the goal for this priority. This priority emphasizes that residents and visitors should feel safe and secure in their neighborhoods and sur- rounding spaces anywhere in the City. Placemak- ing, or the activation of space for social interaction, has been a proven strategy to have more "eyes on the street'.' One of the objectives of this plan is to explore the beautification of the streetscapes in the City's main transit corridors and gateways. The Parks Master Plan incorporates strategies to incor- porate placemaking at parks, trails, gateways, and major corridors to provide safe and access to parks and open space. Strategy 6, Placemaking, also ex- plores the use of public art that captures the City's characteristics in public plazas for family gather- ings, and additional space for social interaction are other important recommendations. 18 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN POLICIES AND GUIDANCE FROM OTHER STUDIES 2016 Menifee Trails, Parks, Open Space, and Recreation Master Plan The five key strategies and improvements to satisfy the current and future needs are: 1. Fiscal Related Implications 2. Park Facility Development Implications 3. Recreation, Health, and Fitness Implications 4. Sustainability, Environmental and ParkOperation Implications 5. Public Participation and Relations The 2016 Menifee Trails, Parks, Open Space, Recreation Master Plan provided a guide and implementation tool for the management and development of parks and recreational facilities throughout the City. It gathered feedback from residents and stakeholders using a variety of methods including, stakeholder interviews, community workshops, sports organization questionnaires, an online survey, and a telephone survey. Based on feedback from residents and stakeholders, the plan found a list of the most desired facilities. Those were biking trails, walking and hiking trails, aquatics, soccer fields, baseball fields, and softball fields. Other highly desired facilities include playgrounds/tot lots, community centers/regional multi -use intergenerational center, a sports complex/regional park, artificial turf, a cultural arts center/performing arts center/ theatre, a football field, and lighting at other sports fields. The plan then identified recommendations in a multi -phase approach using short, mid, and long- term goals, including maintenance improvements, park renovations, and new facility and programming opportunities. The plan also identified funding sources for these recommendations. Some of these recommendations included Joint -use Agreements with school districts and Mt. San Jacinto College. The recommendations also included trails and bike facilities with priority throughout central Menifee, connecting the east and west portions of the City. It also included recommendations to acquire vacant privately owned parcels and convert them into recreational opportunities. The ®VALLEY'WIDE recommendations also included 21 new parks to be constructed in approved subdivisions and built by developers. The 2016 Master Plan also included a list of improvements to be made to existing parks and recreation centers. Since the adoption of the 2016 plan, the City has added 15 new parks. » Hidden Hills Park - 5.19 acres » Central Park - 4.77 acres » Talavera Park - 2.7 acres » Creek View Park - 3.56 acres » Silver Star Park - 3.42 acres » Mayfield Park - 3.71 acres » Centennial Park - 9.96 acres PLANNING CONTEXT 19 » Calle Tomas Play Trail - 0.41 acres » Sunset Park -1.62 acres » Remington Park - 4.87 acres » Underwood Park - 9.16 acres Banner Village Park - 5 acres The Lakes (Lago Vista Sports Park) (Valley -Wide Park) - 29.06 acres » Mosaic Park (Valley -Wide Park) -1.47 acres » Heritage Lake Sport Park (Valley -Wide Park)- 19.51 acres A total of 19 of the 21 improvements to existing parks that were identified in the 2016 plan have been completed. These improvements include: Audie Murphy Ranch Sports Park » Soccer field renovation Redesign skatepark entry Add BBQ to picnic areas E.L. Pete Petersen Park Renovate picnic shelter » Tree pruning Walkway repair Kay Ceniceros Senior Center Interior improvements La Ladera Park Playground surface replacement » Sports field lighting Lazy Creek Park and Recreation Center » Building renovation Turf renovation » Tree pruning » Parking lot renovation Renovate shuffleboard area Lyle Marsh Park Benches and park amenities Paint picnic shelter » New restroom John V. Denver Park Rubber surface » New restroom 2018-2023 Strategic Visioning Plan The 2018-2023 Strategic Visioning Plan was originally adopted in 2018 and updated annually until 2023 when the City engaged in a five-year Strategic Planning process. It provides goals and objectives that align with key stakeholder goals that balance the current and future needs of the City with available resources. It is updated each year to ensure it remains relevant to the ever-growing and evolving city. The goals and objectives are categorized into three timeframes: short-term (less than 2 years); medium -range ( three to four years); and long-term (5 plus years). The document helps close the gap between the current and future needs of residents and stakeholders. The four overarching goals include: 1. Safe and attractive community 2. Livable and economically prosperous community 3. Responsive and transparent government 4. Accessible and interconnected community The 2022 Strategic Plan Update also recognizes the importance of parks and natural spaces through the identification and acquisition of open spaces for parks and trails, and the development of unique park amenities, green spaces, trails, cultural and recreational facilities and programming that serves the diverse needs and desires of the community. Some additional values of the City in relation to parks and recreation include: "We value focused growth in particular areas of the City in order to retain our natural open spaces:" » "We recognize the social and ceremonial importance of a central gathering place where we can interact with neighbors and fellow residents and hold our annual community celebrations:' "We value the preservation of the views created by our scenic ridgelines, natural landforms, and rock features that are defining characteristics of our City." » "We value the creation of parks that are evenly distributed throughout the City (east and west of the 1-215).' » "We value that our amenities are accessible by users of all ages.' » "We value our network oftrails and the alternative recreational experience they provide.' 20 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN The 2022 Strategic Plan Update has been complet- ed and the City will be applying these goals to on- going projects. Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget Book The Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget Book provides an overview of the City of Menifee's Operating and Capital Improvement Budget. This document cov- ers the budget process as well as highlights the in- dividual line items for each department and fund. Existing population, growth, and planned city de- velopments used in this Parks Master Plan were referenced to be consistent with this plan. Park Development Guidelines The City of Menifee Park Development Design Guidelines were approved in March 2015 and they serve as a standard for consultants to follow when designing a new park in the City. There are four goals that the Community Services Department identified to help ensure the City maintains high quality parks. The design goals include: 1. Aesthetics 2. Function 3. Economics 4. Health and Safety The Park Development Guidelines are in need of updating and could use the recommendations from this Master Plan for guidance in updating the Park Development Guidelines. 2020 Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District Master Plan Update The 2020 Valley -Wide Master Plan updates the previous Valley -Wide Master Plan with goals to maintain, sustain, and improve the existing park system and prepare for future growth and development. The district encompasses several different communities within Riverside County, including Temecula, Hemet, San Jacinto, Beaumont, Menifee east of Interstate 215, and many unincorporated areas of the county. The overall district operates and maintains over 80 parks, 11 community centers, one aquatic center, two dog parks, 61 ballfields, 40 soccer fields, and more. The plan lists several opportunities based on focus groups, community surveys, leadership and stakeholder interviews, community needs assessments, and inventory and LOS needs. Some of those key opportunities include: Improving marketing, communications, branding, maintaining existing parks and facilities, level of service, and quality, creating new parks with development, maintaining the affordability of services and programs, connecting communities with walking and biking trails, identifying dedicated funding to support operations and growth. The plan identifies four overarching goals: 1. Continue to improve organizational efficiencies 2. Continue to improve programs and service de- livery 3. Improve and expand facilities and amenities 4. Increase financial opportunities The Valley -Wide Master Plan also provides cost estimates and prioritization for each of the goals and gives them a short, mid, or long-term time frame for completion. Other Relevant Documents: » City of Menifee Active Transportation Plan » Ordinance No. 2014-146 (Regulations for the use of Public Parks) Quimby Mitigation » Development Impact Fees Capital Improvement Plan » Legado Development Project » Nexus Study PLANNING CONTEXT 21 VALLEY -WIDE RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT OVERVIEW Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District is a regional park system that owns parks in the eastern portion of Menifee, eastern Temecula, Winchester, Hemet, San Jacinto, French Valley, Beaumont, and unincorporated areas of Riverside County. Valley -Wide owns and operates over 80 parks and facilities with 25 of the parks in the City of Menifee. Valley-Wide's district population is 234,207 and it is continuing to grow, with projections up to 320,000 by 2032, according to the 2020 Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District Update. The City of Menifee makes up 12 percent of the districts overall population. For the purposes of this report, Valley - Wide parks were inventoried using aerial imagery and reviewing the 2020 Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District Master Plan Update. For the 2023 Menifee Parks Master Plan, physical fieldwork was not conducted at Valley -Wide park sites and therefore conditions of Valley -Wide amenities were not reported. Aldergate Dog Park Detachment Efforts of the City of Menifee/Valley-Wide Recreation and Park District Since Menifee's incorporation, the City has made an effort to unify all of the public parks in its limits. In 2015, the City of Menifee began the process to seek local oversight of Valley -Wide parks within City limits by expanding park maintenance services into Valley -Wide territory on the east side of Menifee and discontinuing Valley -Wide services. In 2016, the City submitted a detachment application to Riverside LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission) to unify of all public parks in the City. In 2017, Riverside LAFCO approved the application if the City conducted a tax assessment vote and paid Valley -Wide $500,000. The City appealed, but LAFCO upheld the decision. The City then filed a lawsuit against LAFCO in hopes of voiding the conditions of approval. In 2021, the Riverside County Superior Court decided that LAFCO was within its authority to impose conditions, and the application for detachment had expired. The decision of the court was a setback for the City in seeking oversight over Valley -Wide parks, but the City will continue to work to expand City services to Valley - Wide parks and unify those parks into the City parks system. Lago Vista Sports Park 22 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN The existing land use in Menifee consists of primarily resi- dential land uses, mostly single-family housing in the cen- tral portions of Menifee. On the outskirts of the City are large tracts of agricultural land uses and vacant open land. The surrounding land use is rapidly changing and evolving due to population growth in the City. FIGURE 2-2: Existing Land Use (2021) Mail ;M111►K !I Ebsting Land Use 8.1-14 du/ac Residential (8,144 R) Conservation (OS-C) Rural Mountainous 10 ac min (RM) ® 201724 du/ac Residential (2(1,1-24 R) Recreation / Undeveloped (OS-R) Rural Residential 5 ac min (RR5) Commercial Retail (CR) 0,20 - Q35 FAR Water (OS-W) Rural Residential 2 ac min (RR2) Commercial Office (CO) 0.25 -1.0 FAR Public(Quasi Public Facilities (PF) Rural Residential 1 ac min (RR1) Heavy Industrial (HI) 0.15 -0.50 FAR Specific Plan (SP) Rural Residential 1/2 ac min (RR1/2) Business Park (BP) 0.25 - 0.60'FAR Public Utility Corridor (PUC) 21-5 du/ac Residential (2.1-5 R) Economic Development Corridor (EDC) ® Railroad 51-8 du/ac Residential (5.1-8 R) F-1 Boundary 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 4 Miles PLANNING CONTEXT 23 HOA COMMUNITIES The City of Menifee has over 45 Home Owners Associations (HOA) communities, ranging in size from 11 acres to over 500 acres. Many of these HOA communities contain their own parks and recreation facilities such as playgrounds, pools, sports courts, trails, and private recreation centers. Figure 2-3 shows where these facilities are located along with the number of facilities. The largest HOA communities are Audie Murphy Ranch, Sun City, Heritage Lakes, The Lakes, Canyon Heights, and Oasis Community. HOA parks and facilities are not counted towards the overall City Level of Service (LOS) in the analysis because they are not open to the public, and generally, only HOA residents are permitted to use these facilities. One of the challenges posed by HOA facilities is the potential for unequal access to parks in various areas throughout the City. This occurs as HOA facilities provide diverse park amenities exclusively to residents of these HOAs, while the overall City The Lakes gated community Ne The Ranch House at Audie Murphy Ranch HOA playground facilities also offer similar features. Furthermore, community parkfacilities that may be required to be built by the developer tend to be closely associated with the communities they are developing, limiting this benefit to their development. Although these required parks help to offset the demand for parks, the placement of them may not be beneficial to the overall City, especially in older developed communities, like Sun City or rural areas. An understanding of the facilities offered by these HOAs helps with the overall planning effort. Recommendations for new community park facilities and locations may help inform planning staff to direct developers on the logical placement of additional community parks to help balance these throughout the City. However, an inventory of the various amenities and assets within these HOA facilities was not within the scope of this Master Plan. The Oasis 55+ HOA community pool The Ranch House at Audie Murphy Ranch HOA pool 24 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FIGURE HOA Communities and Facilities 1 � 1 , � I 1 t ' Heritage Lakes �= IMP'- 'I A � - / i a _i + • I Canyon Heights Oasis Community Audie Murphy Ranch LakesI. '-------- -VIAtul! _+ IWJrd1i �'� ; l' 1 I 1 1 + 1 I 1 1 I 1 + + I-------------------------� �--' HOA Parks, Paseos, Pools, & Recreation Centers HOA Communities City Boundary 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f I a t 2 4 Miles PLANNING CONTEXT 25 Page intentionally left blank 26 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Existing Conditions EXISTING CONDITIONS WHERE ARE WE NOW? The City of Menifee operates 19 public parks, one dog park, and two community centers, totaling approxi- mately 83 acres of parkland. Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District owns and operates 25 parks, one dog park, and two community centers within Menfiee city limits. Valley -Wide operated parks reside east of Inter- state 215 within the City of Menifee. All of these public parks offer ample opportunities for passive and active recreation within the City. This chapter will take a closer review into the existing park level of service and how level of service can be analyzed in different manners. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Gaining a clear understanding of the existing and projected demographic character of the City is an important component of the planning process. By analyzing population data, trends emerge that can inform decision making and resource allocation strategies for the provision of public parks, recreation amenities, and open spaces. For example, if the demand for soccer fields was steadily on the rise and existing public recreation amenities for soccer were barely meeting existing user demand, then the City may want to consider targeting investments to meet the increasing needs of this growing segment of the population. Key areas were analyzed to identify current demographic statistics and trends that can impact the planning and provision of public parks and recreation services in Menifee. Community characteristics analyzed and discussed consist of; » Existing and projected total population >> Age distribution Racial and ethnic character Household information Household income 0.4% 0.5% Native American or Some other race Other Pacific Islander 0.4% American Indian 4.5% or mor 6.j% races Asian 1W Racial and Ethnic Makeup 43.9% White FIGURE 3-1: Racial and Ethic Makeup 37.8% h+�st� trm -,; L 28 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FIGURE 3-2: Demographic Data This demographic profile was completed using the most current data Summary available (as of May 2022) from the U.S. Census Bureau. A summary of demographic highlights is noted in Figure 3-2, followed by a more ® detailed demographic analysis. According to the 2020 U.S. Census Bureau latest estimates, the City of Menifee has a total of 106,627 residents and 36,526 housing units. The racial and ethnic make-up in Menifee is 43.9 percent white, 6.1 percent Asian, 6.3 percent Black, 0.4 percent American Indian, 0.4 percent Pacific 106,627 Islander, 0.5 percent some other race, and 4.5 percent two or more races. Population About 37.8 percent of the population identifies as Hispanic or Latino. Key 2022 demographic comparisons with other city, state, and nation- al statistics include: The estimated median age of Menifee residents is 36 years, slightly lower than the median age for California (36.5) and lower than the United States (38.5). The estimated population under 18 years in Menifee is 26,480 peo- ple, which is 24.9 percent of the total population. OB Ln The median household income for Menifee in 2022 is estimated to be $93,000. This is higher than the median household income of 369526 $75,235 in California, and much higher than the national median household income of $62,843. Housing Units >> Menifee's estimated population was almost evenly split between male (49 percent) and female (51 percent) residents. The popula- tions of California and the United States are also roughly evenly di- vided between genders. Menifee Population Growth Trends SCAG projects that from 2020 to 2045, the City's population will in- crease by 37.3 percent. But due to all of the new planned development and development under review, the population will likely increase at a much more rapid rate. Taking into account all of the planned develop- ment, by 2035 the population is projected to increase to about 124,567. 36.0 FIGURE 3-3: Menifee Population Growth Trends Median Age 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 $93 9000 20,000 Median Household Income 2010 2014 2016 2018 2022 2035 Source: SCAG Demographic and Growth Forecast, 2020 and Menifee Future Residential Development EXISTING CONDITIONS 29 PARK CIASSIFICATIONS Park planning often classifies parks into one of eight possible park types including: Mini Parks, Neighborhood Parks, Community Parks, Recre- ation Area/Regional Parks, Special Use Facilities, Natural Area/Greenbelts, Linear Parks, and Joint Use Facilities. For this Menifee Parks Master Plan, three grouped existing park types have been used (Table 3-1). The broader park type descriptions have been included to describe a future classifica- tion system that can accommodate the plan's rec- ommendations. Park classifications are generally driven by park use, purpose, and size. The classifi- cations are not grouped by maintenance frequency or the presence of a particular asset. This classifi- cation system serves the following purposes: It provides a general guideline for future devel- opment options. The combination of descriptors for each park type represents what has gener- ally been successful on a certain sized plot of land located in a certain type of physical envi- ronment. These guidelines can help to set com- munity expectations for a given site. » They serve as a basis for policies around appro- priate programming in different park types. The classifications inform functional planting design standards and other design standards. The park types should be analyzed both inde- pendently and collectively to determine the City's existing conditions and future requirements. POCKET/MINI PARKS 1 0-2 ACRES These are typically small scale developed urban spaces. Usually only a few residential house lots in size or smaller, pocket parks can be tucked into and scattered throughout the urban fabric where they serve the immediate local population. These parks can vary in size and can be slightly larger that two acres. They often offer few amenities including turf, planters, walkways, plazas, play areas for children, and picnic amenities. Pocket Parks typically do not provide restroom facilities or on -site parking. Pock- et/Mini Parks generally serve three categories: 1. Downtown destination parks which are signa- ture parks of interest to the broad community. 2. Downtown parks where neighborhood involve- ment in activities and programming is most ap- propriate. Small public spaces or beauty spots which are small islands within the urban environment and present opportunities to enhance the City's character and identity. Calle Tomas Play Trail: A Mini Park (0.41 acres) TABLE 3-1: Classified Existing Parks with Associated Acres OIRYL PARK •J1 Mini Parks <2 acres CITY ACRE 2.03 VALLEY -WIDE 5.43 HOA FACILITIES 28.05 TOTAL 35.51 Neighborhood Park <2-10 acres 75.16 45.38 23.54 142.08 Community Parks + Center TOTAL I >10 acres 38.45 115.64 113.49 162.30 0.00 I 51.59 151.94 329.52 30 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 1 2.1-10 ACRES Typically these parks serve the surrounding neigh- borhood for multiple uses. Park development may include play areas, small fields, benches, picnic tables, and improved paths and may include re- stroom facilities. Geographic range of users is up to one -half -mile. E.L. Pete Petersen Park: A Neighborhood Park (4.92 acres) COMMUNITY PARKS 1 10.1-30 ACRES A Community Park meets the recreational needs of several neighborhoods and may also preserve unique landscapes and open spaces. These parks serve multiple uses and provide recreational ame- nities and accommodate group activities not pro- vided in neighborhood parks. Community park sites should be accessible by arterial and/or collec- tor streets. The geographic range of users is up to three miles or City-wide if the park contains a rec- reation complex. Audie Murphy Ranch Sports Park: A Community Park (11.28 acres) RECREATION AREA/REGIONAL PARKS 30.1-LARGER These parks supplement neighborhood and com- munity parks, serving broader City-wide recreation needs. The parks contain various assets, often for active recreation, and are programmed accordingly. Many also have designated natural areas. Restroom facilities and off-street parking are generally pro- vided for users. Geographic range of users is City- wide. SPECIAL USE FACILITY This category refers to stand-alone parks or facil- ities that are designed to serve one particular use such as a golf course or senior center. These parks may serve a secondary or third use, but the prima- ry use is prioritized with regard to design, mainte- nance, and funding decisions. Kay Ceniceros Senior Center: A Special Use Facility (1.45 acres) NATURAL AREA/GREENBELT Established for the protection and stewardship of wildlife, habitat, and other natural systems support functions. Some natural areas are accessible for low -impact use. Minimal infrastructure may include access and signage, where it will not adversely im- pact habitat or natural systems functions. Larger natural areas may have small sections developed to serve a community park function. LINEAR PARK (no existing facilities) Established as an aesthetically -pleasing transpor- tation corridor which includes trails, green streets, and boulevards. Linear parks often provide safe pe- destrian routes as well as recreation opportunities. Desired assets include improved path, lighting, and landscaping. Optional assets may include benches, play area, viewpoint, public gathering space, fitness stations/par course and flat grassy area for infor- mal activity. JOINT USE FACILITIES These parks supplement community parks, serv- ing broader City-wide recreation needs. The parks contain various assets, often for active recreation, and are programmed accordingly. Restroom facil- ities and parking are generally provided for users. Geographic range of users is City-wide. An addi- tional classification could be considered if the City of Menifee enters into a joint -use agreement with another public agency and funds improvements which allow the City the right to expanded hours of use. EXISTING CONDITIONS 31 EXISTING PARKS CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS ® Calle Tomas Play Trail ® Sunset Park ® Creek View Park Silver Star Park ;. La Ladera Park Spirit Park E.L. Pete Petersen Park Mayfield Park Hidden Hills Park Lyle Marsh Park Central Park Nova Park ® John V. Denver Park Talavera Park Remington Park Banner Village Park Quartz Ranch Park VALLEY -WIDE RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT PARKS Autumn Breeze Park Brindle Mills Park Desert Green Park V Grand Vista Park Ai Pepita Square Park Menifee South Tot Lot ® Mosaic Park Heritage Heights Park Discovery Park El Dorado Park Eller Park Heritage Park Hidden Meadows Park La Paloma Park Mahogany Creek Park McCall Canyon Park Mira Park Rolling Hills Park Lazy Creek Park and Recreation Center Audie Murphy Ranch Sports Park Gale Webb, Kids-1341, Action Sports Park ® Underwood Park ® Centennial Park Kay Ceniceros Senior Center aAldergate Park Heritage Lakes Sports Park Marion V. Ashley Park and Community Center Sunrise Park �c Lago Vista Sports Park eWheatfield Park, Menifee Gym and Rec Center 32 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FIGURE 3-4: Existing Park Types and Locations ------------------------ I 1 + 1 1 1 � 1 1 I ' 1 1 , I 1 1 1 _ ' I 1 1 �I 1 1- 1 1 1 ------_-' �_ ----- V1 1 � �� 1 I 1 eel 1 1 1 I� '---------- ®.� 1 I I 1 ® ` 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 R 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 - - - - - -1 • ---------- I-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -� City Neighborhood & Mini Parks City Community Parks -r Valley -Wide Neighborhood & Mini Parks Valley -Wide Community Parks Cfl 4 Miles This map shows the geographic distribution of each park in the City. The parks on the east por- tion of the city are largely operated by Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District. EXISTING CONDITIONS 33 EXISTING FACILITIES A CLOSER LOOK AT MENIFEE'S PARKS The City's existing park amenities and facilities were inventoried using both data provided by the City and on -site field work. Table 3-2 summarizes these amenities and facilities and compares them with the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) guideline service level. The 2020 NRPA Agency Performance Review guidelines were used for this analysis. The numbers are determined by acquiring data from agencies across the coun- try and then averaging them based on population groupings. The calculations are based on the City's population of 106,627 according to 2022 Census ACS 5-Year Estimates, which places Menifee in the 100,00-250,000 NRPA category. The NRPA guidelines are advisory, allowing the City to compare itself to others. This also allows the project team to make informed custom decisions that reflect the unique needs of the City in the rec- ommendations section of the Master Plan. The City of Menifee has: A2 Mini Parks - . ■ Mini Calle Tomas Play Trail 10.41 acres Parks Sunset Park 11.62 acres Neigh- borhood Creek View Park 13.56 acres Parks Silver Star Park 13.42 acres La Ladera Park 18,35 acres Spirit Park 18,74 acres E.L. Pete Petersen Park 4.92 acres Mayfield Park 1 3.71 acres Hidden Hills Park 15.19 acres Lyle Marsh Park 1 5.81 acres Central Park 14.77 acres Nova Park 1 3,36 acres John V. Denver Park 11.87 acres Talavera Park 12.70 acres Remington Park 14.87 acres Banner Village Park 15,00 acres Quartz Ranch Park 15.48 acres -0- Com- 'r % Neighborhood munity Lazy Creek Park and Recre- 5 Parks Parks/ ation Center 13.41 acres Centers Audie Murphy Ranch Sports Park 111,29 acres Gale Webb, Kids-R-#1, Action YCommunity Sports Park 16.19 acres 5 Parks Underwood Park 19.16 acres Centennial Park 19.96 acres Kay Ceniceros Senior Center 11.45 acres 34 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN TABLE 3-2: City-wide Park Amenitv Inventory Neighborhood Center Y • I j c � a U CIO I O O O a a Cc c • (n Q U • _ m a « Y .c c « cci c Y m m Cr-0m N m Y u) cn a a Y a m Y m rn s `° >' m 1= `m o 3 i co Y a fO a a N N `m act a o a m a) a o m oCCU65 p m> _T acta> 3 c act m U a) N a) > J d i .a J d C > C > C a) O t W a] N a) C > a) CIOC.)J a7 7(/7U a) W (n uJ .� T O a) m 2 2 U J Z H 0 m Cf J Q (7 U ypy Y 1 Recreation Center 1 Community Center 0 Senior Center 1 1 1 Teens Center 0 Nature Center 0 I Performance Amphitheater 1 1 Basketball Court** 15.5 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.5 2+ Lighted Basketball Court 10.5 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1.5 —� Community Garden 1 1 Diamond Field*** 4 I I I 1 2 Lighted Diamond Field 1 3 Dog Park 14— 1 , _ Multi -purpose Field **** 9 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1J 1 1 1 1 1 Lighted Multi -purpose Fieeld—� 4 Pickleball Court 11 4 11 2 4 1 Lighted Pickleball Court 8 4 4 _ Picnic Area (12+ People) 32 1 1 3 4 3 1 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 j 1 2 Playground (Ages 6-12) 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 Playground (ages 2-5) 16 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Skate Park/Bike Park 2 1 1 Swimming Pool 0 _ Splashpad/Sprayground 1 1 Tennis Court 4 3 1 Lighted Tennis Court 3 3 I _ 1 1 i Volleyball Walking Path/Loop 15 1 1 1 1 Walking Path (miles) 5.31 015 0.27 0.31 0.67 0.69 0.32 0.81 0.3 0.21 0.27 0.16 - - - 0.51 - 0.56 Exercise Area 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Restroom Bldg. 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Notes: * Parks under construction or under construction at time of fieldwork. Inventory counts based on planned amenities. ** Basketball Courts: one half court = .5, one full court = 1 *** Diamond Fields consists of youth and adult baseball fields, youth and adult softball fields, and multi -use diamond fields. **** City Multi -purpose fields: soccer fields and football fields Gray lines indicate lighted amenities of the above amenity EXISTING CONDITIONS 35 EXISTING FACILITIES A CLOSER LOOK AT VALLEY -WIDE PARKS IN MENIFEE Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District's park amenities and facilities were also inventoried with- in the City using data provided by the City, aerial imagery, and the 2020 Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District Master Plan Update. Table 3-3 sum- marizes these amenities and facilities and com- pares them with the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) guideline service level. Valley -Wide Parks within the =o= City of Menifee has: 8 Mini Parks R. -0. ONeighborhood Parks 6 Y Community • Parks Centers Mini Autumn Breeze Park 11.49 acres Parks Brindle Mills Park 10.38 acres Desert Green Park 10,45 acres Grand Vista Park 10.30 acres Pepita Square Park 10,23 acres Menifee South Tot Lot 11.11 acres Mosaic Park 11.47 acres Heritage Heights Park 10.53 acres Neigh- Discovery Park 766 acres borhood Parks El Dorado Park 3,24 acres i Com- munity Parks/ Centers Eller Park 14,90 acres Heritage Park 14,84 acres Hidden Meadows Park 13.37 acres La Paloma Park 14.33 acres Mahogany Creek Park 14.29 acres McCall Canyon Park 13.03 acres Mira Park 16.23 acres Rolling Hills Park 12.49 acres Aldergate Park 18.13 acres Heritage Lakes Sports Park 119.51 acres Marion V. Ashley Park 111.36 acres Sunrise Park 116,54 acres Lago Vista Sports Park 129,06 acres Wheatfield Park 126.89 acres 36 CITY OF MEN IFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN TABLE 3-3: Valley -Wide Park Amenity Inventory Community Neighborhood Parks Parks / Center Valley -Wide Inventory of Major Park . Amenities Park Amenities Recreation Center■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 CommunityTeens o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■ Senior Center o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ Center o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Natu o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Performanceo■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ :.... ®■■■■■■o■o■oo■■000■■�i■000 Lighted Basketball . o■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■©■■■ CommunityField*** o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� m■■■■■■■■000■■■■■o■o■©a©• ...... FieldRes o■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■©■© Multi-purposeo■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■a■■o■ LightedMulti-purpose.Pickleball o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■o rt ... ... ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■ ... m■o■■■■o■o©o©■■o■■■■©oo©o ......... ®o■■■■oo■00000■000■�■oo■o Playground (ag ®■0■■■0■0■D00■0■■■0 0■00® o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ IME 0■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MEN .......... o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Tennis • ©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©■■■© Lighted ©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©■■a Volleyball©■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■o .... o■■■■■■■■aooa■■a■■■■oaao■ o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■ . .. Bldg. m■■■■■■■■o■o■■■■■■■o©o 00 Notes: "Basketball Courts: one half court = .5, one full court = 1 *** Diamond Fields consists of youth and adult baseball fields, youth and adult softball fields, and multi -use diamond fields. **** Multi -purpose fields: soccer fields and football fields Gray lines indicate unlit and lighted amenities of the above amenity EXISTING CONDITIONS 37 DESCRIPTIONS OF EXISTING CITY PARKS Each park in the City of Menifee is listed with its existing amenities and their condition. The condi- tions of each amenity were evaluated using three categories: excellent, good, and poor. Each amenity also has a size associated with it: large, medium, and small. Each amenity was then given a weighted score based on these two factors. All of the amenity scores for each amenity at a park were then add- ed together and then divided by the park acreage to give it an overall rating. This shows what parks may need to add new or updated amenities. For example, even though La Ladera Park has many amenities, some of them scored low due to their condition, reducing the overall score. This shows that some of the amenities at La Ladera Park are TABLE 3-4: City-wide Park Assessment Scores in need of upgrades. Generally, the lower the score the more likely the park is in need of updates. The higher the score, the less likely the park amenities will be in need of updates for several years. Howev- er, park size does play a factor in the assessment. The overall size of the park can lower the Weight- ed Per Park Acres and Condition even in a brand new park since most of the acreage is dedicated to larger open spaces such as fields. It is also im- portant to note that the condition of small ameni- ties like benches, bike racks, and trash receptacles although evaluated, are not included in the park amenity tables. Total # of Amenities _ Park Acreage = Amenities per Park Acre Weighted Amenity Total based on Condition and Size (Condition x Amenity size) _ Park Acreage = Weighted per Park Acre and Condition TOTAL WEIGHTED PARK NAME PARK TYPE #OF AMENITY AMENITIES TOTAL Calle Tomas Play Trail Mini Park 3 8 WEIGHTED AMENITIES PARK PER PARK PER PARK ACREAGE ACRE ACRE AND CONDITION 0.41 7.3 19.5 Sunset Park Mini Park 2 3 1.62 1.2 1.9 Creek View Park Neighborhood Park 2 5 3.56 0.6 1.4 Silver Star Park Neighborhood Park 5 11 3.42 1.5 3.2 La Ladera Park Neighborhood Park 15 25 8.351 1.8 , 3.0 Spirit Park Neighborhood Park 1 141 31 8.741 1.61 3.5 E.L. Pete Petersen Park Neighborhood Park 12 14 4.921 2.41 2.8 Mayfield Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 3.71 1.3 1.6 Hidden Hills Park Neighborhood Park 9 20 5.191 1.7 3.9 Lyle Marsh Park Neighborhood Park 61 10 5.81 1.0 1.7 Central Park Neighborhood Park 6 18 4.77 1.3 1.5 4.3 1.9 _3.8 4.2 Nova Park Neighborhood Park -_ 5 14 _ 3.36 John V. Denver Park _ Talavera Park Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park 8 9 1.87 _ _ _ _ 4.8 5.2 _ _ _ 5 - 4 _ - 2.7 Remington Park* Neighborhood Park 71 20 4.87 1.4 4.1 Banner Village Park* Neighborhood Park 6 22 5 1.2 4.4 Quartz Ranch Park* Neighborhood Park 111 32 5.48 2.01 5.8 Lazy Creek Park Neighborhood Park 7 11 3.41 2.1 3.2 Audie Murphy Ranch Sports Park Community Park _12 _ 18 11.29 _ 1.11 Gale Webb, Kids-R-#1, Action Sports Park * Community Park _ _ 6 6.19 _ 0.6 I Inrinrumnri Part[ * (`nmmi ini+v Pn A- 7r 9d I O'IR n Q 1.6 1.0 9 R Centennial Park Community Park ill 28 9.96 1.1 2.8 * Parks under construction or under construction at time of fieldwork. Inventory counts based on planned amenities. Excellent conditions is assumed at parks under construction. 38 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Calle Tomas Play Trail Calle Tomas Play Trail is a mini -park located within a residential neighborhood off Newport Road, just west of 1-215. It is only 0.41 acres and contains just a few amenities of small playground equipment. It is relatively new and therefore received a very high amenity score. '34 Walking Path at Calle Tomas Play Trail Sunset Park Sunset is a new 1.8 acre mini -park located on the western edge of the City in a neighborhood off Goetz Road. It has a small shaded playground and picnic area. Shaded play area at Sunset Park Sheltered picnic area at Sunset Park Creek View Park Creek View Park is a neighborhood park located near Audie Murphy Ranch off Audie Murphy Road. It follows the Salt Creek Trail and contains outdoor fitness equipment. At the very western edge is the Ranch House, the private Audie Murphy Ranch HOA clubhouse, pool, and playground. Small open space at Creek View Park (a Silver Star Park Silver Star Park is a small neighborhood park located in the eastern portion of the City within the Audie Murphy Ranch HOA. It has several amenities packed into 3.4 acres. It has a shaded playground, basketball court, picnic shelter, restroom building, a concrete ping pong table, concrete corn hole, two small open fields, and a walking path that connects to the existing HOA paseo network. The paseo has additional outdoor exercise equipment, benches, and picnic tables. Shaded playground at Silver Star Park Concrete ping pong at Silver Star Park EXISTING CONDITIONS 39 La Ladera Park La Ladera Park is located in the western area of the City off La Ladera Road. It has a large unlighted diamond field, four pickleball courts, playground, basketball court, several picnic areas, restroom building, and a walking path with outdoor fitness equipment along the path. Playground at La Ladera Park Basketball Courts at La Ladera Park Spirit Park Spirit Park is located on the corner of Newport Road and Berea Road. It is a large neighborhood park with many amenities. It has two basketball courts, three tennis courts, several group picnic shelters, large playground, restrooms, walking path, outdoor fitness equipment, several small open fields and a parking lot. l Tennis Courts at Spirit Park E.L. Pete Petersen Park E.L. Pete Petersen Park is a neighborhood park with several amenities including a basketball court, multi -purpose field, playgrounds, picnic areas, and the only City -owned dog park. It is located on the corner of Murrieta Road and Park City Avenue. The dog park is planned for an update and expansion in the future. Playground at E.L. Pete Petersen Park Multi -purpose field at E.L. Pete Petersen Park Mayfield Park Mayfield Park is located on the corner of Evans Road and Rim Creek Path. It is a neighborhood park with restrooms, a picnic shelter, playground, outdoor fitness equipment, and open field. Fitness Area at Mayfield Park 40 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN 0 Hidden Hills Park Hidden Hills Park is a neighborhood park with several amenities including a multi -purpose field, tennis court, basketball court, picnic areas, play- ground, and walking paths. The walking paths with- in the park continue around many different areas of the surrounding residential areas. Small group picnic area at Hidden Hills Park Playground at Hidden Hills Park Walking paths at Hidden Hills Park Lyle Marsh Park Lyle Marsh Park is located off Bradley Road between Newport Road and La Piedra Road, south of Chester W. Morrison Elementary School. It contains a multi -purpose field, inclusive playground, outdoor fitness equipment and several sheltered picnic areas. Playground at Lyle Marsh Park Central Park Central Park is a neighborhood park with many amenities located near the City -center and is home to numerous city-wide special events with direct access to the Paloma Wash Trail. It has a small am- phitheater, a large open field, playground, market kiosks, and a picnic area. Market Kiosk at Central Park i outdoor stage/amphitheater at Central Park EXISTING CONDITIONS 41 Nova Park Nova Park is located in the north area of the City, just west of 1-215. It has a multi -purpose field where the community can play soccer. It also has a shad- ed playground and small playground equipment along a walking path. Multi -purpose field and nature-themed play at Nova Park John V. Denver Park John V. Denver Park, previously known as Rancho Ramona Park, is a small neighborhood park located near the McCall Boulevard and 1-215 interchange. It consists of several amenities including a bas- ketball court, picnic areas, a playground, a horse- shoe pit, and a small open field. It is located near a multi -family residential development, providing important access to parks and recreation areas for those households. Shelter at John V Denver Park Basketball Court at John V. Denver Park Talavera Park Talavera Park is a newly opened small neighborhood park located in the northeast corner of the City off Antelope Road. It has a shaded climbing playground, picnic area, restroom building, small walking loop, and an open field with a baseball backstop. Entry sign at Talavera Park Playground at Talavera Park Open field and backstop at Talavera Park 42 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN ® Remington Park Remington Park is a newly opened park located in the northeast corner of the City within the new Brookfield neighborhood off Junipero Road, north of Boulder Ridge Elementary. It has many new neigh- borhood amenities including two pickleball courts, picnic area, large shaded inclusive playground with zip line, concrete corn hole, and outdoor exercise equipment. Remington Park Shaded all-inclusive playground at Remington Park _ �-fir.'.. +l •�.. ... Pickleball courts at Remington Park Banner Village Park Banner Village Park was under construction at the time of this Master Plan but the park amenities will include a splashpad, picnic shelter, basketball court, and parking. Conceptual plan of Banner Village Park Splashpad design at Banner Village Park Quartz Ranch Park Quartz Ranch Park was under construction at the time of this Master Plan. The amenities at this park will include a lighted multi -purpose field, four pick- leball courts, a covered playground, picnic shelter, a restroom, and parking. N�JJ J I j JJ JJ JY J Jjam WeiJ ..J J .. J •i J J y"� Conceptual Plan of Quartz Ranch Park EXISTING CONDITIONS 43 Lary Creek Park and Recreation Center Lazy Creek Park is a community park that also has a newly renovated recreation center on site. The park includes two basketball shooting courts, a sand volleyball court, and a playground. Lazy Creek Park restrooms and rear of recreation center 6 Audlie Murphy Ranch Sports Park Audie Murphy Ranch Sports Park is located on Newport Road near the Audie Murphy Ranch HOA community in the western portion of the City. It is a community park with many amenities such as a skatepark, a lighted diamond field, a rectangular soccer field, a walking loop, multiple picnic areas, a playground, restrooms, and parking. Group Picnic Shelter at Audie Murphy Ranch Sports Park Diamond Field at Audie Murphy Ranch Sports Park GGale Webb, Kids-1141, Action Sports Park Gale Webb, Kids-1341, Action Sports Park is one of the newest parks in the City, opened in November 2022. It consists of two pump tracks, a smaller one for beginners and a larger one, as well as three jumplines. It is located in the southern portion of Menifee west of 1-215 on the corner of Craig Avenue and Evans Road. r Aerial view of Gale Webb, Kids-R41, Action Sports Park Bikers at Gale Webb, Kids-R41, Action Sports Park P l� Biker Jumping at Gale Webb, Kids-R-#1, Action Sports Park 1 44 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN ® Underwood Park Underwood Park is a new 10-acre community park. It is located on the corner of Rouse Road and Ante- lope Road in the northeast corner of the City. It has many amenities including a lighted multi -purpose field, shaded all-inclusive playground, exercise ar- eas, basketball court and half court, picnic shelters, walking paths, restrooms, and parking. Lighted multi -purpose field at Underwood Park Playground at Underwood Park Outdoor fitness equipment at Underwood Park aCentennial Park Centennial Park is another community park in the City. It contains two lighted diamond fields, a lighted multi -purpose field, basketball courts, playgrounds, and picnic areas. It is located on the corner of Holland Road and Briggs Road. It is the only City -owned park property located in the southeastern part of the City. Diamond Field at Centennial Park Basketball Courts at Centennial Park ® Kay Ceniceros Senior Center Kay Ceniceros Senior Center is centrally located in the same complex as the City of Menifee Commu- nity Services Department Headquarters. It also has a small community garden, the only City -owned community garden in the City. Kay Ceniceros Senior Center Entrance EXISTING CONDITIONS 45 LEVEL OF SERVICE Level of Service (LOS) within the context of park planning is a measurement to evaluate how parks, open spaces, and amenities serve the given com- munity. A LOS analysis is used to benchmark cur- rent conditions based on NRPA metrics and other regional metrics for park amenities. LOS is used to help direct future planning efforts based on project- ed population growth and future park amenities. LOS describes how a recreation system provides residents access to recreational amenities. It indi- cates the ability of people to connect with nature and pursue active lifestyles. It can have implica- tions for health and wellness, the local economy, and the quality of life. Furthermore, LOS for a park and recreation system tends to reflect community values. It is often representative of people's connec- tion to their communities and lifestyles focused on outdoor recreation and healthy living. TABLE 3-5: Existing Level of Service (2022) CITY AND VALLEY -WIDE ACTIVE PARKS NEIGHBORHOODCOMMUNITY) Existing Park Acreage* (Excludes golf courses and HOA 277.9 parks) Recommended Adopted Standard 5.0 per 1,000 Population Acres per 1,000 Population (2020) 2.6 Total Surplus/Deficit Acres per (2,4) 1000 Population (2020) Acres in Deficit 255.2 * Golf courses and HOA parks are private and not open to the general public and therefore not counted towards LOS Population -Based Service Analysis A population -based service analysis for Menifee's park system was performed using NRPA Park Met- rics from the 2020 Agency Performance Review Survey. An amenity spreadsheet was produced in- dicating the amenities that are located in each park. These amenities were then totaled and listed under each park. The Master Plan inventoried the City's existing recreation amenities and developed a comprehensive matrix. Table 3-6 summarizes these amenities and compares them with the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) guide- line service level. It was also based on the recom- mended Needs Assessment standards for the City of Menifee showing the population per one facility. The calculations are based on the current popula- tion level in the City of Menifee of 106,627 according to the 2020 Census American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. This table also shows the existing park and sports amenities available at each park. Because private parks and JUA/MOU may not be available to the public at all times, school and private amenities are not included in LOS analysis. According to the recommended standards, the City currently meets the needs of many amenities in- cluding recreation centers, senior centers, basket- ball courts, diamond fields, playgrounds, and more but is deficient in some of the sports (multi -purpose field, tennis, and volleyball), swimming pools, and community centers. LOS is an appropriate metric to show of where defi- cits may be. However, this is not the only measure to determine LOS of park amenities. For instance, The NRPA metrics do not reflect regional and local trends in Southern California such as futsal, hand- ball, pelota mixteca, and other adventure type sports such as obstacle courses, climbing walls, rope courses, bouldering, and adventure playgrounds. As such, an additional metric should be applied to capture the community's priorities, needs, and im- pressions on the current park system. This should be used in addition to the population -based level of service analysis that can provide a good indication of the future park needs. The needs will be further discussed in other chapters of the report. According to the park inventory and the NRPA guidelines (Table 3-6). The City currently meets the LOS needs for the following categories: » Senior centers Performance amphitheaters » Basketball courts Diamond fields and lighted diamond fields Dog parks Picnic areas Playgrounds (both for tot lots and ages 6-12) Skate parks/bike parks Walking paths Exercise areas Restroom buildings 46 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Although the following categories are highlighted in red, they are within a small margin and can be considered as meeting the NRPA guidelines: » Recreation centers » Community centers » Teen centers » Nature centers » Community gardens The City does not meet the following categories based on the NRPA guidelines using averages for the city size of Menifee, again these guidelines do not take into account community priorities and lo- cal trends: » Multi -purpose fields and lighted multi -purpose fields n. Swimming pools » Splash pads/spraygrounds » Tennis courts » Pickleball courts and lighted pickleball courts Volleyball courts TABLE 3-6: Level of Service Current Population (NRPA Averages) Recreation Center 1 1 2.0 51,265 51,000 2.1 (0.1) Community Centers 0 1 1.0 55,136 55,000 1.9 (0.9) Senior Center 1 0 1.0 120,062 120,000 0.9 0.1 Teens Center 0 0 0.0 152,714 152,000 0.7 (0.7) Nature Center 0 0 0.0 119,206 119,000 0.9 (0.9) Performance Amphitheater 1 0 1.0 111,226 111,000 1.0 0.0 Basketball Court 15.5 13 28.5 8,870 4,435 24.0 4.5 Lighted Basketball Court 10.5 4 14.5 8,870 4,435 24.0 (9.5) Community Garden 1 0 1.0 66,341 66,341 1 1.6 (0.6) Diamond Fields (Baseball/Softball) Lighted Diamond Field (softball/baseball) 4 3 17 21.0 1 41,829 20,000 5.3 15.7 7 10.0 14,429 14,429 74 2.6 Dog Park 1 1 2.0 75,805 75,805 1.4 0.6 Multi -purpose Field* 9 7 16.0 - 6,250 17.1 (1.1) Lighted Multi -purpose Field Pickleball Court Lighted Pickleball Court 4 11 7 11.0 12,505 6,250 5,000 17.1 (6.1) (6.3) 4 15.0 30,502 21.3 8 2 10.0 30,502 5,000 21.3 (11.3) Picnic Area (12+people) 32 16 48.0 15,000 1 5,000 21.3 26.7 Playground (age 6-12) 18 15 33.0 4,936 4,936 21.6 11.4 �• Playground (tot lot / age 2-5) 16 12 28.0 19,978 19,978 5.3 22.7 Skate Park/Bike Park 2 0 2.0 103,438 103,438 1.0 1.0 • Swimming Pool 0 0 0.0 69,051 1.5 (1.5) Splash pad/Sprayground 1 0 1.0 ��6951 - 35,000 3.0 (2.0) Tennis Court 4 5 9.0 7,264 7,264 14.7 (5.7) Lighted Tennis Court 3 3 6.0 7,264 7,264 14.7 (8.7) Volleyball Court 1 2 3.0 22,250 22,250 4.8 (1.8) Walking Path 15 9 24.0 - 6,000 17.8 6.2 Exercise Area 10 0 10.0 - 12,000 8.9 1.1 Restroom Building 18 10 28.0 10,000 10.7 17.3 .Indicates a shared amenity with seasonal use - point included in single purpose facilities Gray lines indicate lighted amenities of the above amenity EXISTING CONDITIONS 47 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS As a part of the existing conditions analysis, the team performed a comparative analysis of stan- dards from comparable sized Southern California cities. This effort compared the City of Menifee to four other cities population. It compared standards for Menifee to the cities of Murrieta, Perris, Oceans- ide, and Ontario. Although Oceanside and Ontar- io have larger populations, they still fall under the NRPA amenity metrics group of cities with 100,000 to 250,000 population. This effort was completed to add additional analysis to the LOS averages provid- ed by NRPA. In doing so, it compares the City on a regional level, rather than a national level. Table 3-7 compares the five cities (at a high level) by look- ing at population, number of park sites, total park acres, parks per 1,000 population, total number of park amenities, and total number of park amenities per population. The comparative analysis also looks at the num- ber of existing amenities in other cities and com- pares them to the NRPA averages to create an overall metric that combines the averages of each city, shown on Table 3-8. This helps to understand where the City of Menifee sits regionally in terms of amenity quantity. For example, the NRPA analysis shows that Menifee is in a deficit of tennis courts, but when you compare it regionally, it is above av- erage by 4.2 courts. Please note that rectangular soccer field's are included in this table for the other cities although the City of Menifee soccer field's fall under the multi -purpose field category. FIGURE 3-5: Comparative Analysis Cities Ir Perris Murrieta Oceanside 41111 0 0 5 10 Miles ' I iI TABLE 3-7: Comparative analysis with southern California cities RANK Year Last PMP Complete 2009 2021 2019 2021 2023* - City Population (at time of PMP) 100,173 79,137 176,000 185,010 106,627 128,569 4 # of Park Sites (Parks 48.0 27.0 51.0 34.0 56.0 43 T and Facilities) Total Park Acres 467.2 189.0 642.0 260.0 280.8 368 Park Per 1,000 People 4.7 2.4 3.6 1.4 3.0 3 Total # of Park Assets 104.0 79.0 176.0 289.0 236.5 177 T of Park Assets Per 0.10% 0.10% 0.10% 0.16% 0.23% 0.14% T Population x Park and amenity totals are from last completed Master Plans. Current totals may have changed since. 48 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN The City of Menifee is above the regional average for several amenities including: » Recreation centers Basketball courts Diamond fields » Dog parks » Group picnic areas (12+ people) » Playgrounds » Tennis courts Volleyball courts TABLE 3-8: Amenity Comparative Analysis The City is below the regional average for the fol- lowing amenities: » Community centers Community gardens Skate parks/bike parks » Swimming pools ETA COMPARATIVEMENIFEE Recreation Center 3,0 2.0 1.0 N/A 1.6 N/A IDE VALLEY - 9.0 3,5 5.5 9.0 3.6 5.4 2.0 2.1 (0.1) 5.8 3.0 T Community Center 0.0 1.8 (1.8) N/A 1.4 N/A N/A 3.2 N/A N/A 3.4 N/A 1.0 1.9 (0.9) 0.5 (1.4) Senior Center N/Al 0.8 N/A N/A 0.7 N/A N/A 1.5 N/A N/A 1.5 N/A 1.0 0.9 0.1 N/A N/A Teens Center N/A 0.7 N/A N/A 0.5 N/A N/A 1.2 N/A N/A 1.2 N/A 0.0 0.7 (0.7) N/A N/A Nature Centers 0.0 0.8 (0.8) N/A 0.7 N/A N/A 1.5 N/A N/A 1.6 N/A 0.0P1.6 (0.9) 0.0 (0.9) Performance Amphitheater 2.0 2.0 1.1 N/A 0.7 N/A N/A 1.6 N/A N/A 1.7 N/A 1.00.0 N/A N/A Basketball Court 12.0 22.6 (10.6) 10.0 17.8 (78) 11.0 39.7 (28.7) 30.0 41.7 (11.7) 28.54.5 18.3 (10.9) T Lighted Basketball Court N/A 22.6 N/A N/A 17.8 N/A N/A 39.7 N/A N/A 41.7 N/A 14.5(9.5) N/A N/A Community Garden N/A 1.5 N/A 1.0 1.2 (0.2) N/A 2.7 N/A 2.0 2.8 (0.8) 1.0(0.6) 1.3 (0.5) .�. Diamond Field (softball/baseball) 9.0 5.0 4.0 15.0 4.0 11.0 23.0 8.8 14.2 23.0 9.3 13.7 21.0 5.3 15.7 18.2 11.7 Lighted Diamond Feld (softball/basebalo Dog Park N/A 6.9 1.3 N/A (1.3) N/A 1.0 5.5 1.0 N/A 0.0 N/A 12.2 N/A N/A N/A 3.0 12.$ 2.4 N/A 0.6 10.0 7.4 2.6 0.6 N/A 1.5 N/A (0.1) + 0.0 N/A 2.3 2.0 1.4 Multi -purpose Field Lighted Multi -purpose Field 16.0 16.0 N/A 25.0 12.7 12.3 28.0 28.2 (0.2) 30.0 29.6 0.4 16.0 17.1 (1.1) 24.8 2.9 - N/A 16.0 N/A N/A 12.7 N/A N/A 28.2 N/A N/A 29.6 N/A 11.0 17.1 (6.1) N/A N/A Pickleball N/A 20.0 N/A 8.0 15.8 (78) 8.0 35.2 (27.2) 1.0 37.0 (36.0) 15.0 21.3 (6.3) 8.0 (19.3) + Lighted Pickleball Court N/A 3.3 N/A . N/A 2.6 N/A N/A 5.8 N/A N/A 6.1 N/A 110.0 3.5 6.5 N/A N/A • Picnic Area (12+people) 21.0 20.0 1.0 4.0 15.8 (11.8) 24.0 35.2 (11.2) 33.0 370 (4.0) 48.0 21.3 26.7 26.0 0.1 T Playground (age 6-12) 33.0 20.3 12.7 18.0 16.0 2.0 47.0 35.7 11.3 22.0 37,5 (15.5) 33.0 21.6 11.4 30.6 4.4 + . Playground (tot lot / age 2-5) N/A 5.0 N/A N/A 4.0 N/A N/A 8.8 N/A N/A 9.3 N/A 28.0 5.3 22.7 N/A N/A • Skate/Bike Park 1.0 1.0 0.0 N/A 0.8 N/A 3.0 1.7 1.3 N/A]25.5 N/A 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.8 f. • Swimming pool 1.0 1.5 (0.5) 0.0 1.1 (1.1) 3.0 2.5 0.5 N/AN/A 0.0 1.5 (1.5) 0.8 (0.7) f. • Splash pad /sprayground N/A 2.9 N/A N/A 2.3 N/A N/A 5.0 N/A N/AN/A 1.0 3.0 (2.0) N/A N/A Tennis Court 3.0 13.8 (10.8) 2.0 10.9 (8.9) 16.0 24.2 (8.2) 9.0 (16.5) 9.0 14.7 (5.7) 7.8 (10.0) + Lighted Tennis Court N/A 13.8 N/A N/A 10.9 N/A N/A 24.2 N/A N/A N/A 6.0 14.7 (8.7) N/A N/A Volleyball 3.0 4.5 (1.5) 2.0 3.6 (1.6) 4.0 79 (3.9) 5.0 (3.3) 3.0 4.8 (1.8) 3.4 (2.4) t Walking Path 20.0 16.7 3.3 10.0 13.2 (3.2) 170 29.3 (12.3 34.0 3.2 24.0 17.8 6.2 21.0 (0.6) + Exercise Area N/A 8.3 N/A 2.0 6.6 (4.6) N/A 14.7 N/A 10.0 (5.4) 10.0 8.9 1.1 4.4 (1.8) + Restroom Building 11.0 10.0 1.0 N/A 7.9 N/A 29.0 17.6 11.4 24.0 5.5 28.0 10.7 173 18.4 7.0 + Gray lines indicate lighted amenities of the above amenity EXISTING CONDITIONS 49 MENIFEE SCHOOLS The City of Menifee has many schools within the City. It has two elementary school districts and one high school district. There are 11 elementary schools, four middle schools and two high schools. Menifee has a relatively young population, 26.7 per- cent of residents are under the age of 20 (Southern California Association of Governments). Schools within close proximity to public parks provide many recreational opportunities to children and teens. The City of Menifee is also served by Mt. San Jacin- to College, Perris Union High School District, and privately operated Santa Rosa Academy, which the City has a facility -use agreement with the school for the use of its amenities and facilities. The City coordinates with school districts to provide the best use of those public and private resources to meet recreation demands of the community. Currently, the City only has one facility -use agreement in place at Santa Rosa Academy. The City should continue to create partnerships with school districts and other various organizations that lead to agreements to meet the demands of the community. Current recreation amenities at school sites within the City of Menifee include: Mt. San Jacinto College —Joint Use Agreement (JUA) (timing is to be determined) will include: » 5,000-seat stadium Parking lot » Classrooms Courtyard Amenities not a part of future JUA include: 1 softball field 1 multi -purpose field Sand volleyball courts 1 Mt. San Jacinto College Menifee Campus Football Field Stadium Perris Union High School District Heritage High School Swimming pool » 3 softball fields 2 baseball fields 1 football field—lighted/synthetic » 3 soccer fields —overlaid on softball/baseball fields 6 tennis courts Paloma Valley High School » Swimming pool » 2 softball fields 2 baseball fields 1 football field—lighted/synthetic » 8 tennis courts Liberty High School (Winchester, CA) » Football/soccer stadium » Baseball fields Softball fields » Swimming pool » Tennis courts Basketball courts Romoland School District Ethan Chase Middle School —Adjacent to Discovery Park 1 multi -use field Santa Rosa Academy —Facility -use Agreement (as needed), includes: » Gymnasium and indoor facility space » 1 diamond field » 1 multi -use field » 3 outdoor basketball courts Indoor Basketball Courts at Santa Rosa Academy 50 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FIGURE 3-6: Menifee Schools ------------------------ Harvest Valley' Romoland Elementary, , ' Elementary �r •- --- ---- - - - - - -- �- r' Heritages ' High , ' e Mesa View ' Hans Elemen, ry + Christensen � . • , Middle Boulder Ridge ' Elementary Ethan A 4ase ' - -'- Middle � I , Quail Valley Ridgemoor Elementary Elementary Freedom Crest' ; Elftnentary ' ' ■ Chester W. Callie Kirk ' _ _ _ _ _ _ Morrison Patrick , Elementary Elementary ' Y � Evans Ranch Bell Mountai4% , - - + Elementary .. Santa Rosa fiddle Southshore i Academy16 IFElementary _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - . Paloma Mt. San Jacinto + + _ Valley High College ,. i L Menifee Liberty High Valley Middle i School ' i ------' •----------, -------------------------� - �--' Community Colleges Schools Menifee City Park iValley -Wide Recreation & Park District Park 0 1 2 4 Miles EXISTING CONDITIONS 51 ADJACENT PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES Publicly -owned Facilities Lake Perris State Recreation Area Lake Perris is located in Riverside County between the City of Moreno Valley and Perris. It contains over 8,000 acres and includes amenities such as campgrounds, group camp, a hunting zone, picnic areas, two swimming beaches, an Indian muse- um, an equestrian camp, and equestrian/multi-use trails. It is the southernmost State Water Project Facility and the southern terminus of the California Aqueduct 19 miles from Menifee City Hall. Lake Perris State Recreation Area Diamond Valley Lake Diamond Valley Lake is adjacent to the Diamond Valley Reservoir and is run by the Metropolitan Water District. It contains several large sized sport fields, a major aquatic center and one educational based museum. A RV park is also being added in the near future. The area also includes a large num- ber of hiking and equestrian trails open to the pub- lic. The lake is open to fishing and boating activities, although swimming in the lake is not allowed. Diamond Valley Lake Aerial View Lake Elsinore Recreation Area Lake Elsinore is located south of Menifee on 3,300 acres. It contains the popular Launch Point camp- grounds and opportunities for boating, fishing, camping, wakeboarding, windsurfing, and many other water activities. It is also a major center for sky -diving and hang-gliding due to the warm air that blows from the Ortega Mountains just west of the lake 10-miles from Menifee City Hall. Lake Elsinore Recreation Area Kabian Park Kabian Park is managed by Riverside County Re- gional Park and Open -Space District and is locat- ed just north of Quail Valley northwest of the City boundary 7.5 miles from Menifee City Hall. It is mainly passive open space with 640 acres of open space, hiking, and equestrian trails. There is a small park area with a picnic shelter and a small play- ground. Y View from a hiking trail at Kabian Park Salt Creek Trail The Salt Creek Trail is a project completed by Riv- erside County identified in the County's General plan since the 1990s. The four -mile segment that runs west to east through the City of Menifee was completed in late 2020. It is a 12-foot wide multi -use path. The Salt Creek Trail is an ongoing project and the County hopes to expand the trail to connect other communities in Riverside County. 52 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Valley -Wide Community Centers Menifee Community Center The Menifee Community Center located at Wheat - field Park is a small and out -dated facility. It offers a limited number of programs including dance, jazzercise, yoga, martial arts, and art classes. Val- ley -Wide also offers programming based at Wheat - field Park and at the Menifee Gym, the only gym in the City. It is a joint -use facility located at Bell Mountain Middle School. Programming includes open gym, youth volleyball and basketball, men's softball and tennis lessons at the park. Marion V. Ashley Community Center Marion V. Ashley Community Center is a 25,000 square foot community center. It offers a variety of programs and classes including Zumba, mar- tial arts classes, youth and adult sports classes including basketball, volleyball and soccer clinics, gymnastics, dodgeball, and mom and me classes. It also has rentable space for parties and events. There is a Child Development Center serving chil- dren 18 months to 5 years of age. Care is provided for a partial day or full day, and is private and state subsidized. Marion V. Ashley Community Center Private and Commercial Recreation Available to the Public Nearby Drop Zone Drop Zone Water Park opened in 2014 in Perris, CA, a few miles north of the City's northern boundary. This was a $24 million Riverside County project that is operated privately but the City of Menifee con- tributed to the development of this waterpark. It is located on 12 acres off Trumble Road and it oper- ates in the summer from mid -May to mid -Septem- ber. While this facility is not located within the City of Menifee, it helps to fulfill a missing gap in aquatic facilities north of the City. Amenities at Drop Zone include: » A 50-meter pool with diving boards Two large water slides Water play structures for toddlers The Meridian Springs Pool, utilized for beginner swim lessons » A "lazy river" Locker rooms The "Flow Rider" which allows guests to body surf and stand-up surf Beach volleyball Snack bar and covered eating area sN; Water slides at Drop Zone water park Field of Dreams In 2012, the City of Perris opened the Field of Dreams. The $25 million facility features four major league baseball field replicas of Anaheim Stadium, Dodger Stadium, Fenway Park, and Yankee Stadi- um. This park also contains an indoor soccer pavil- ion, restaurant, batting cages, and two playgrounds. It is located directly south of the Drop Zone Water Park, 9 miles from Menifee City Hall. Field of Dreams at night EXISTING CONDITIONS 53 TRAILS, BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PARK CONNECTIONS The City has existing trails and bike facilities as identified in the City of Menifee Active Transporta- tion Plan, completed in December 2020. Some of these include soft surface, paved, or a combination of different surface types. These trails help connect residential areas to parks. Audie Murphy Ranch is a good example of an area that has trails that connect residential areas to Audie Murphy Ranch Park. The City also has a small number of bicycle facili- ties throughoutthe community. Bicycle facilities like multi -use paths (Class 1), bike lanes (Class 11), and bike routes (Class 111) can provide residents with al- ternative forms of transportation to parks and other facility types. Riding bicycles to parks and provid- ing the option can promote a more active lifestyle. The Salt Creek Trail was described in the previous section. The Salt Creek Trail is a critical trail con- nection that assists in connecting the City from east to west. This multi -use path provides an alternative form of transportation to parks and provides the City with future pedestrian and bike connections to parks and other facilities. The Paloma Wash Trail is a Class I; multi -use path just west of Interstate 215 that runs north to south for the freeway for approxi- mately one mile on both sides of the wash. This trail currently has a connection to Central Park. Paloma Wash Trail GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS A Geographic Distribution Analysis (GDA) was per- formed on the community parks, neighborhood parks, and recreation centers. A GDA examines the walktime, biketime, and drivetime to these parks as determined by using a Geographical Informa- tion System (GIS) based parkshed analysis. Results from this analysis are displayed in Figure 3-8. The park's GDA analysis takes into account the per- centage of the population served by neighborhood, community, and regional parks. Instead of using a traditional 1/2-mile circle from parks that only considers a direct distance, the method deployed takes into account actual walking, driving, or bik- ing distances that considers walking, biking and driving routes someone would use to get to these parks. This actual network method is more accurate since it puts attention on the need to improve the local networkto enhance access to parks. Standard circles are highly inaccurate in determining access for areas that have significant barriers such as free- ways, highways, rivers, rail lines or steep topogra- phy. The GDA is important since it can highlight the areas that may have greater park needs. For each neighborhood park, community park, community center, special use park, and regional park, a GIS analysis was completed that generat- ed polygons representing a 1/2-mile walkshed or 15-minute walkshed, given a walking speed of 2.5 mph (slowed to 2 mph to take into account street crossings, some with signals). The 2-mile driveshed or 5-minute driveshed assumed posted speed lim- its which tends to average 35 mph with it slowing to 30 mph average with signals, loading, finding park- ing, and unloading. Resulting walkshed polygons were superimposed on the City base map to see which regions were well covered by park access and to estimate the number of residents served by park type. 54 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Existing Trails and Pedestrian/Bike Access to Parks ---------------------- ---------------- r , A r - , r-- Vol City-wide Parks Valley -Wide Parks Salt Creek Trail ' -= Existing Segment Future Segment ' I " - — — — —� `— — — — — -— Existing Bicycle Facilities Class I: Multi -use path Class II: Bike Lane Trails Combination Paved Soft surface City Boundary 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 4 Miles EXISTING CONDITIONS 55 Parksheds There are two main parksheds used to analyze the service area a park provides to the City; walkshed and driveshed. For each park type, a Geographi- cal Information System (GIS) analysis generated a polygon representing a 1/2-mile walkshed or 15-min- ute walkshed and a 2-mile driveshed or 5-minute driveshed. The resulting service catchment areas were overlaid on the City base map to see which regions were well covered by park access and to estimate the number of residents served by each park type. Table 3-9 is a summary of the parkshed assumptions. Populations within a 1/2-mile walk - shed (which is equivelant to a 15 minute walk) are typically useful for determining the parkshed for mini parks and neighborhood parks. Whereas, populations within a 2-mile driveshed or 5-minute driveshed are useful for determining the parkshed for community parks/ centers and regional parks. Figure 3-8 displays a 1/2-mile parkshed (15 minute walktime to the parks) and associated residential land use in Menifee to show which areas of Menifee have convenient access to parks. The series of maps on pages 56-62 show the park travelsheds of parks with selected amenities and census age data. These maps show how certain amenities are distributed throughout the City geo- graphically and associated local select age groups. Relevant age related amenities include playgrounds, sports courts (basketball, tennis, sand volleyball, and pickleball), diamond fields, multi -purpose fields, and community centers. TABLE 3-9: Categorized Park Level of Service Developed General Purpose Parks Mini and Neighborhood Parks 122.6 Community Parks + Center 155.3 All Active Parks 280.8 Special Use + Regional Park / Open Space Special Use Facility Regional Park Area Salt Creek Trail 2.0 3.0 5.0 1.1 1.5 2.6 (0.9) (1.5) (2.4) (6.0) (6.0) 56 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FIGURE 3-$:1/2 and 2-Mile Travelsheds with Existing ResidentiaNse ------------------------ --------------- Rural Residential �- - City Boundary ; ' X, ' I N �.. HOA Communities Single Family Residential Multi -Family Residential Mobile Homes and Trailer Parks Mixed Residential 'j, i '-----' - - - - - + t- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1 City Neighborhood & Mini Parks City Community Parks Valley -Wide Neighborhood & Mini Parks iValley -Wide Community Parks 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 City Parks 1/2 Mile Walkshed Valley -Wide Parks 1/2 Mile Walkshed City Community Parks 2 Mile Driveshed ValleyANiide Community Parks 2 Mile Driveshed 4 Miles EXISTING CONDITIONS 57 FIGURE 3-9: Existing Parks with Playgrounds ------------------------ Percentage of Population Under 18 ' r 0-9% - Oft , 10-19% 30-39% i '000 1 � i ,._0... �3 -- $ ♦ r � ,r MEL - -------- - - - - -- `---------- City Parks with Playgrounds Valley -Wide Parks with Playgrounds City Parks with Playgrounds 112 Mile Walkshed ;.. Valley -Wide Parks 1/2 mile Walkshed _.. Areas with major gaps for Playgrounds 0 1 1 1 f I I I I i 0 1 2 4 Miles This map shows a 1/2-mile walkshed to parks with playgrounds for both city parks (green) and Val- ley -Wide parks (purple). It also overlays Census tract data to show populations under 18 years of age. There is a large gap of playgrounds in Quail Valley where there is a large population of children under 18, 58 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Existing Parks with Sport Courts ------- - - - - - - Percentage of Population Under 18 0-9% _ 1 - 1 10-19% 1� 20-29% 1-------••-----1 1-- 1 1 ` 1 1 1 30-39% t16r ` ' 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1' 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 , f_ 1 City Parks with Sport Courts 1 1 now � .a ` I ------------ 1 � 1- 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 ` ----------------_-y- - Valley -Wide Parks with Sport Courts This map shows a 1/2-mile walkshed to parks with sport courts (Basketball, Tennis, Pickleball, and Volleyball). The overlaid census City Parks with Court sports 112 Mile Walkshed tract data shows populations under 18 years of age. It is important to note that other age groups utilize sport courts, but under 18 year Valley -Wide Parks with Sport Courts 1/2 Mile Walkshed olds are less likely to have reliable transportation to these facilities like older age groups may have. Making it more critical for them (^ Areas with major gaps for sports courts to be within walking distance to these facilities. There are many portions in the city where service is not reached shown in the blue circle gaps. 0 1 1 1 i I 1 1 77 0 1 2 4 Miles EXISTING CONDITIONS 59 FIGURE 3-11: Existing Multi -purpose Fields Areas with major gaps for multi -purpose fields I Nova Park U- C ' ` Underwood Heritage Lakes Park SportPark es 0 E.L. Pete Petersen Park dera Park - - - % ' - -, Audie Mur h Ranch i. aLa py Sports Park Lyle Marsh Park D ' Quartz Ranch Park �Lago Vista Sports Park ; Hidden"Hills Park 1 Centennial Park I� i ----------------------i -- City Parks with Multi -purpose Fields ` e7 Valley -Wide Parks with Multi -purpose Fields City Parks with Multi -purpose Fields 1/2 Mile Walkshed Valley -wide Parks with Multi -purpose Fields 1/2 Mile Walksheds City Parks with Multi -purpose Fields 2 Mile Driveshed Valley -Wide Parks with Multi -purpose Fields 2 Mile Driveshed City Boundary 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T_____1 0 1 2 4 Miles This map shows a 1/2-mile walkshed and a 2-mile driveshed to existing multi -purpose fields. Multi -purpose fields are considered a community amenity because they can serve a greater popula- tion, therefore a 2-mile driveshed is shown in addi- tion to the 112-mile walkshed. Multi -purpose fields are overall well -distributed throughout the city with service not reaching the northwest portion and central portions of the City. 60 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FIGURE 3 Existing Diamond Fields Areas with major gaps for diamond fields ------------------------ - - i Marion V. Ash - Eller Park E: ley Park and Community •------------+ ,-- Center .00 � y , C , , -•' i `,, iscovery Park: I Sunrise w , 111 , El Dorado Park /Alderga; Park �. a La ' 00 , -,Audie Murphy Panch Sports Park t - -' !! WheatfieidPark Lago Vista � �- - - - - - - - - - Sports Park I. i Centennial a ' Y Mira Park . , ---- - - - - -- + ,------' - - - - - + , iCity Parks with Diamond Fields - i Valley -Wide Parks with Diamond Fields City Parks with Diamond Fields 112 Mile Walkshed Valley -Wide Parks with Diamond Fields 1/2 Mile Walkshed This:map shows a 1/2-mile walkshed and a2-mile drivesh- ed to existing diamond fields. Diamond Fields are con - City Parks with Diamond Fields 2 Mile Driveshed sidered a community amenity because they can serve a greater population, therefore a 2-mile driveshed is shown Valley -wide Parks with Diamond Fields 2 mile Driveshed in addition to the 1/2-mile walkshed. C,ty Boundary +__J e0 1 2 4 Miles EXISTING CONDITIONS 61 Existing Community Centers Areas with major gaps for community centers r E 1 - 1 .40 1 10 � I 1 1 �+ 1 1 , 1 1 ' � 1 Lazy Creek Re r 'Qn , C terlZLZ Kay Ceniceros`Sen'Or CieRter 1, r. 1 -'ti©: Wheatfie d Park ' nity Center '-- - - - - -- f � 1 1 , 1 , 1 1 , 1 1 1---------- ►------------ ---' '--' City of Menifee Community Centers ft ... 00 © Valley -Wide Community Centers City Community Centers 112 Mile Walkshed Valley -Wide ComunRy Centers 1/2 Mile Walkshed City Community Centers 2 Mile Driveshed Valley -Wide Community Centers 2 Mile Driveshed 0 r 0 2 This map shows a 1/2-mile walkshed and a 2-mile driveshed to ex- isting Community and Senior Centers. Lazy Creek Recreation Center and Kay Ceniceros Senior Center provides service to the central por- tion of Menifee, Wheatfield Park Community Center provides service to the southeast portion of Menifee and Marion V Ashley Community Center provides service to the north east portions. There are missing gaps in the northwest and southern portions of Menifee. 4 Miles 62 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN PROGRAM OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS The City of Menifee currently provides a wide va- riety of recreation classes and programs through their facilities. The City seeks to make programs available to all age groups throughout the year. Pro- gram locations include Lazy Creek Recreation Cen- ter, Kay Ceniceros Senior Center, as well as online programs. Existing Recreation Programs "Menifee Matters" is a Community News and Activ- ity Guide that is published quarterly to catalog and communicate classes and programs for the coming months. This magazine also highlights other ser- vices and programs offered by the City. This guide provides the following categories for recreational programs; Toddlers (Ages 3-5) » Tiny Tots (Ages 2-5) » Youth (Ages 6-12) » Teens (Ages 13-17) » Adults (Ages 18+) » 55 and Better Facility Rentals (Athletic Fields and Parks) » Adopt-a-Park/Trail Program (Ranger Services) The City utilizes "DaySmart" as its registration soft- ware for the programs offered in these areas, how- ever, these are then categorized by Location or by League. According to attendance data provided by this system, 941 classes were programmed in the 2021-2022 program year. v�1 ° .»r.uncs......r�.a�. >MipA ��f4i In the 2021-2022 program year, the highest pro- grammed classes were (in order of number of classes); Senior Soul Line Dance (997), Taekwon- do (787), Texas Holdem (780), Fitness (762), Ballet 6-9 years (732), Rec N Trek - Middle School Lunch Program (648), Tiny Tots and Little Learners (480), Tai'Chi (460), Pinocchole (451), Bidwhist (387), Be Mighty/Mighty Me Program (381), Black Jack (364), Dominoes (349), Bridge (338), and Quilting (312). The large increase in number of registrants from the previous program year is presumed to be due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the 2021-2022, program year, the City of Menifee had: 941 programs p offered ,& 226,035 total registered participants (programs, events, and field reservation participants) ASHE'! BALL CAMPS .m .... ... yJEEN SE•�SION ; .... EXISTING CONDITIONS 63 Programs Findings According to attendance reports, a total of 941 pro- grams requiring registration were offered by the City and a total of 226,035 registrants in the 2021- 2022 program year. This number includes estimated event attendees, field reservation participants, and program participants from data provided by City staff. The top 15 activities by class number for the 2020-2021 are shown in table 3-10. The top three activities with the highest number of registrants were, Senior Soul Line Dance with 997 registrants, Taekwondo with 787 registrants, and Texas Holdem with 780 registrants. Other classes with high class numbers were Fitness, Ballet 6-9 years, and Rec and Trek - Middle School Lunch Program. TABLE 3-10: Top Fifteen Activities Totals by Registrant Numbers (2021-2022) Senior Soul Line Dance 997 Taekwondo 787 Texas Hold 'Em 780 Fitness 762 Ballet 6-9 years 732 Rec N Trek - Middle School Lunch Program 648 Tiny Tots and Little Learners 480 Tai'Chi 466 Pinocchole 451 Bidwhist 397 Be Mighty/Mighty Me Program 381 Black Jack 364 Dominoes 349 Bridge 338 Quilting 312 Attendance data from 2022-2023 programs so far in the program year was also reviewed for activi- ties with the most registrations. The highest at- tendance -specific programs were Texas Holdem, Fitness, Tiny Tots, and Black Jack. The top fifteen activities by registration count are summarized in table 3-11. Tables 3-10 and 3-11 do not include major events such as the Christmas Tree Lighting or Fall Festival, as well as excluding the Senior Lunch Program and Senior Food Box Programs, all of which have signif- icant response by residents. TABLE 3-11: Top Fifteen Programs Totals by Registrant Numbers (2022-2023, as of March 2023) ACTIVIT y1W Texas Hold 'Em REGISTRANTS 688 Fitness 564 Tiny Tots Program 561 Black Jack 538 Tai Chi 524 Movies in the Park (7/22) 500 Pinochle 416 Flag Football 408 Fall Festival Booth 400 Art -a -Fa i re 375 Dominoes 374 Taekwondo Jrs 365 Youth Basketball 342 Samba 312 Thanksgiving Meals (11/24) 300 64 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Program Comparative Analysis A comparative assessment was made of the pro- grams offered by the City of Menifee Community Services Department (Department) against those offered by comparative communities and districts in Southern California. For the purposes of the pro- gram offering assessment, the following organiza- tions were utilized as comparatives; Riverside, Mur- rieta, Lake Elsinore, Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District, Corona, Perris, and Temecula. In 2022, the NRPA published an agency perfor- mance review that documents programming of- fered by parks and recreation agencies across the country. This chart gives a good benchmark against which to review current programming. The results of the review included determining the percent of agencies that perform specific types of programs, the following were those that were 70 percent or higher; » Themed special events (offered by 90 percent of agencies) » Social recreation events (88 percent) » Team sports (87 percent) Fitness enhancement classes (82 percent) Health and wellness education (80 percent) » Individual sports (76 percent) Safety training (72 percent) » Racquet sports (71 percent) » Aquatics (70 percent) The only program option listed in these that is not currently offered by the City is aquatic program- ming. The safety training was included due to the Online Driver's Ed program currently being offered by Menifee. The following table represents the top 25 programs based on attendance in the two years' worth of data provided by the City. These programs are list- ed based on class registration data. The most pro- grammed classes focus on Horse Riding, Fitness, Foreign Language Arts, Martial Arts, Dance, Art, and Music. Program Offerings from Southern California Recreation and Parks Organizations ORGANIZATIONCORONALAKE ✓ ✓ ELSINORE WIDE ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Early Childhood (Tiny Tots and Toddlers Youth ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Teen ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Adult ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Fitness ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Senior /Active ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Aquatics ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Camps ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Youth Sports ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Adult Sports ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Cultural Arts ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Therapeutic / Inclusive ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Virtual ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ EXISTING CONDITIONS 65 Aquatics Programs The primary difference between Menifee, NRPA Standards (national averages), and findings from comparative cities is the lack of aquatics programs in Menifee, due to the lack of public aquatic facili- ties. This is one of the most desired programs iden- tified in the survey. These programs are currently only available through the Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District at their Aquatic Center in Hemet. It was also discussed with City staff that there is a significant desire for these types of programs to be provided in or around the City. Drop Zone Waterpark in Perris provides recreation- al amenities for aquatics and was intended to serve Menifee residents as the City contributed funds to the development of the park. The City provides field trips to this facility as a program. Temecula, Lake Elsinore, and Corona utilize JUA's and Facility -use Agreements to provide aquatics programming. Lake Elsinore uses the pool at Lake- wood High School and Corona partners with the Corona -Norco Family YMCA for aquatics program- ming. Temecula has one City -owned public pool but they also have a JUA with the local elementary school for their pool to use for swim lessons. Theatre and Cultural and Arts Programs Performing arts programs and theatre troupes are not very prevalent in the area, and those available are typically not publicly programmed. Murrieta is home to a performing arts academy that has the- atre programs. In Hemet, a troupe called the Ramo- na Hillside Players provides theatre programming through a private facility. Temecula has a Commu- nity Theatre group that is sponsored by the local government and operates in their theatre building. These programs require an acceptable facility to implement and a theatre with appropriate ameni- ties to showcase performances. TABLE 3-13: Cultural Arts Programs from Other Recreation Organizations VALLEY- •• • . • • ELSINORE .., Music Lessons and ✓ ✓ ✓ Training Visual Arts (Drawing) ,/ V/ ,/ ,/ ,/ Visual Arts (Painting) ,/ ,/ V/ V/ Dance / ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Choreography Coloring Performance Arts ✓ (Theatre) Art Shows ,/ Multicultural or Diversity 66 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FINANCIAL CONDITIONS OF EXISTING PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES Menifee has budgeted approximately $4.37 million for recreational activities, which translates to $41.08 per capita. The City's primary source of revenues for Community Services are: User Fees: These are fees charged by the depart- ment for specific classes, programs, camps, and rentals offered within the City. These generally help to fund employees, contract instructors, and basic program materials and supplies. Impact Fees: These are fees charged to new or major development. It can help pay for parkland ac- quisition (Quimby Fees) and/or for development of new parks to service new population that is gener- ated by the development. Developer Agreements: Similar to Impact Fees, the City can work with specific large residential or mixed use developments to identify specific parks needs that can be addressed directly by the devel- oper. The developer would then agree to pay the initial upfront costs for recreation needs, but ongo- ing operational maintenance would be the respon- sibility of the City. CFDs/CSDs: The City has several different Com- munity Facility Districts or Community Service Dis- tricts. This is a specialized limited funding source, which helps pay for initial and ongoing costs for recreation needs based upon a specific assess- ment amount. This funding source is specifical- ly assessed to residents of a specific geographic area and is only applicable on recreation and parks needs within that geographic area. Another Possible Quality of Life Tax Revenue: The City passed a general "Quality of Life" reve- nue in 2016. The monies from these taxes can be used for general city purposes including Parks and Recreation. These revenues can be used for annual operational expenses, as well as one-time capital needs. Other Tax Revenue: This refers to property and sales tax revenue (other than Quality of Life") that is used to supplement funding that is not covered by the items aforementioned. It can be used for op- erations, staffing, and infrastructure as needed. Grants, Sponsorships, and Donations: This refers to grant -funding, sponsorships, or direct donations provided to the Department to help fund specific programs or activities. These are not consistent an- nual streams, but typically more program or activi- ty -generated revenue streams. Together these revenue streams help fund the over- all department. Figure 3-14 shows by major service area the types of revenue streams that can help fund those activities: FIGURE 3-14: Parks and Programming Revenue Streams Classes Rentals Potential Golf » Potential Aquatics Youth programs Sports (adult and youth) Senior activities Childcare/after school Park/facility maintenance Park/recreation administration City-wide indirect support As figure 3-14 indicates, more specific functional areas such as contracted classes or aquatics can generally be user fee funded, whereas more com- munity service -based programs such as youth ac- tivities, senior services, etc. are a mix. EXISTING CONDITIONS 67 Table 3-14 shows by current programmatic area for fiscal year 2023 for the City, the annual surplus/(deficit) and the resulting cost recovery percentages. Menifee is generally within the typical cost recov- ery range for most of its programs, except for class- es and rentals. Classes are at a cost recovery of 45 percent (direct only) and rentals are at a cost re- covery of 21 percent (direct only) is higher than the typical range of 20 percent. In addition to user fees, the deficits in these pro- grams are bridged through support from taxes and CSDs/CFDs. However, the funding for CSDs and CFDs can only be utilized within the geographic boundaries of the district. In addition to annual operating needs, the Com- munity Services Department has a robust capital program, with needs for building new facilities, and expanding/improving existing facilities. These cap- ital needs can be funded through Development Im- pact Fees, Developer Agreements, and new CFDs/ CSDs. The City's current Development Impact Fee program is city-wide and not geographic specific. Therefore, new development that pays those fees TABLE 3-14: Programmatic Specific Cost Recovery can be used to fund projects throughout the City. The City completed a nexus analysis in 2022, for implementation in July 2023. Through this nexus analysis, the City was able to increase its impact fees to help offset the future facility needs for the community. Unlike the impact fees, the Developer Agreement and CFDs/CSDs are more project or geographic specific. The Developer Agreement may result in a developer opting to create a park or recreational facilities in their development in lieu of paying de- velopment impact fees. The developer agreement typically only covers the infrastructure costs, not the ongoing maintenance costs. The Community Facility District (CFD) or Community Service Dis- trict (CSD) can help pay for both initial infrastruc- ture costs as well as ongoing maintenance and op- erations of those facilities within the area. Taxes and grants, along with sponsorships and do- nations help fund the gaps needed for both opera- tions and capital projects. While tax revenue is typi- cally not restricted, grants and sponsorships, along with donations, can be specific to programs and/or specific activity types. Direct Costs' $156,023 $312,046 521,768 $418,236 $418,236 Indirect Costs z $55,239 $110,478 $184,730 $155,743 $148,074 Total Costs $211,262 $422,524 $706,498 $573,973 $566,310 Revenue $75,050 $66,000 $5,750 $88,000 $47,000 Surplus/(Deficit) Total Cost Recovery % _ Direct Cost Recovery % ($136,262) ($356,524) ($700,748) 16% 1% 21% 1% 1 20-40% 10-20% ($485,978) 15% ($519,310) I 8% 36% 45% 21% 11% I 30-70% 25-60% Typical Cost Recovery 40-60% 'Direct costs refer to budgeted costs for that program. 2 Indirect costs represent City-wide administration support, Recreation Administration, and Park Maintenance support costs. 68 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN NATIONAL, REGIONAL, AND LOCAL RECREATION TRENDS Since the provision of public parks and recreation services can be influenced by demographic prefer- ences, the Master Plan process identified local and national recreation trends that help define what Menifee residents are seeking. This section reviews local and national recreation trends relative to the City's demographic and identified interests. The current trends impacting City services include: A focus on walking, hiking, and camping in an outdoor setting Participation in youth activities and sports teams Swimming and aquatic -based activities Recreation activities and programs for diverse age -based generations The City can adapt its park and program require- ments by learning from these new shifts in partic- ipation in outdoor recreation, sports, and cultural programs. Household Participation in Outdoor Activities According to the Sports and Fitness Industry As- sociation (SFIA) FIA 2022 Topline Participation Report, American participation in recreational ac- tivities grew significantly in 2021, likely due to the reopening of recreational facilities and programs since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. In 2021 and 2022, inactivity levels declined, decreasing from 0.7 percent from 2020, inactivity is the lowest it has ever been. Activity has increased 7.8 percent since 2016, this is 16.8 million more peo- ple participating in recreational activities in a five- year period. Lower activity levels in this time period were largely due to lower participation levels in the younger age groups. The 18-24 and 25-34 age groups have lower activity levels, as well as the youth age groups of 6-12 and 13-17. Water sports saw the largest increase with partici- pation growing by 2.3 percent, followed by outdoor sports with a 2.2 percent increase. Team sports saw a 1.8 percent increase, but overall participa- tion in team sports is still lower in 2021 than before the start of the pandemic. Pickleball and yoga are among the fastest growing activities in a two year period since the start of the pandemic. Pickleball grew 39 percent and yoga grew by 12.8 percent in the last two years. Table 3-15 shows the 5-year Av- erage Annual Growth of Team Sports nationwide. TABLE 3-15: Nationwide Team Sport Participation Trends TEAM SPORT AAG I Baseball 1.1% ^A Basketball 4.1% AA Cheerleading -2.8% V Football (FLAG) 2.3% n Football (Touch) -3.0% V Football (Tackle) -0.9% Gymnastics -4.0% v Ice Hockey -3.1% v Lacrosse -1.8% Paintball -7.1% Roller Hockey -11.8% Rugby -11.1% v Soccer (Indoor) 1.2% Soccer (Outdoor) 1.1% ^A Softball (Fast -Pitch) -2.6% Softball (Slow -Pitch) -4.7% Swimming on a Team -3.2% v Track and Field -2.6% V Ultimate Frisbee -9.6% Volleyball (Beach/Sand) -5.2% Volleyball (Court) -0.8% v Volleyball (Grass) -7.8% Wrestling 0.2% A Source: SFIA 2022 Topline Report EXISTING CONDITIONS 69 Household Participation in Team Estimated Sport Participation in Sports Menifee According to the 2022 SFIA Topline Report, team sport participation is continuing to grow follow- ing the pandemic. According to the ESRI Business Analyst, it is estimated that 39 percent of all team sport participants in Menifee participate in swim- ming activities, followed by 17 percent participating in basketball. Figure 3-15 shows estimated team sports participation in the City of Menifee. Swim- ming is estimated to be the highest participated sport activity in the City. Although the City does not current own a pool facility, residents are likely ful- filling swimming needs at school facilities, private facilities, HOA pools, or outside the City. This data uses national propensities applied to local demo- graphic composition to estimate the relative likeli- hood of adults in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior. Nationwide Fitness Activity Trends According to the SFIA, Yoga, treadmill use, dance, step, other choreographed exercise, dumbbells/ hand weights, kettlebells, and Pilates training are among the fasting growing recreational activities. All had higher participation numbers compared to 2019. Team sports participation numbers still are lower than before the start of the pandemic in 2019, but have rebounded slightly since 2020. Participation in fast -pitch softball, swimming on a team, court volleyball, gymnastics, and cheerleading have all increased from 2020. Some team sports are grow- ing in popularity. Basketball, tackle football, outdoor soccer, and swimming on a team had more partici- pation numbers than in 2019. Nationally, aquatic exercise still has low participa- tion rates compared to 2019 in most age groups. This may be due to temporary fitness and swimming pool closures. The 65+ age group has the highest participation numbers of any other age group. Figure 3-16 shows recreational activity participation in Menifee from ESRI Business Analyst. There are several differences between national trends in rec- reation and actual participation in Menifee. Walking is the by far the most popular activity, followed by swimming, hiking, and weight -lifting. 0 o a o 01 a u 9 c C N O O UO O E N mY a — H F �- O N > Source: ESRI Business Analyst FIGURE 3-16: Estimated Recreational Activity Par- ticipation In Menifee, CA Zumba IIIIIII� Yoga Weight Lifting r Walking Volleyball Tennis Swimming IIII� Softball Soccer _ Rock Climbing Ping Pang - Pilates Jogging or Running - Hiking Golf - Frisbee Football - Bowling Bicycling (Road) - Bicycling (Mountain) Busketball - Baseball Aerobics - 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Participant Estimates Source: ESRI Business Analyst 70 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Generational Changes in Recreational Activities Activity participation and preferences tend to vary based on several demo- graphic factors, but can also differ based on generational preferences. Figure 3-17 explains each generation and page 70 shows each generation's recreation- al activity preferences and how it has changed since the pandemic. Baby Boomers (1945-1964) Enjoying retirement, they are looking for opportunities in fitness, sports, outdoor activities, cultural events, and other activ- ities that suit their lifestyles. When pro- gramming for this age group, a custom- ized experience catering to the need for self fulfilment, healthy pleasure, nostalgic youthfulness, and individual escapes is important. Millennials (1980-1999) Tech -savvy, socially conscious, and achievement -driven with more flexible ideas about balancing wealth, work, and play. They generally prefer different park amenities and recreational programs from their counterparts in the Baby Boomer generation. Generation Alpha (20 1 0-present) Children of Millennials will have no fear of technology. Every effort to accommodate this generation with high quality, state of the art technology in facilities and with programs will be necessary to reach this group. FIGURE 3-17: Generations The Silent Generation (1928-1945) Began life in difficult conditions, including the Great Depression, World War ll, and economic and political uncertainty. The youngest have reached 75 years of age and can be greatly assisted by the social interaction that takes place at senior cen- ters or within senior programs. Generation X (1965-1979) Are in the peak of their careers, raising families, and growing their connections within the community. Programming for this age group may revolve around adult sport leagues and outdoor entertainment such as music and arts events. Generation Z (2000-2010) As of the 2010 Census, Generation Z forms about a quarter of the U.S. population, nearly half of the youth population is eth- nically diverse. EXISTING CONDITIONS 71 According to the 2022 SFIA Topline Participation Report, fitness sports is the most popular recre- ational activity category by most generations, with the exception of Generation Z. Gen Z's most popu- lar recreational category is outdoor sports in 2021 with 60.8 percent participation. Team sports are also very popular among Gen Z with 55.8 percent participation. Individual sports are popular among Gen Z with 44.0 percent participation and Millenni- al with 41.3 percent participation. Sports categories with the lowest participation are racquet sports, water sports, and winter sports. Overall participation among the generations in the last three years has change due to the COVID-19 pandemic. But the largest changed was that Boom- ers have increased their participation in all catego- ries compared to other generations. Gen X participation decreased across all sport cat- egories likely due to this generation returning back to work as vaccines became widely available and testing for COVID-19 became more accessible. Millennials largely maintained the same activity levels in 2021, except for winter sport participation declining. Nationwide Generational Recreational Activity Participation 80% 70% 70% 60% 500/0 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 61% 61% 31% 23% 15% 5% 56% 17% 16% If IJ _ 19% Fitness sports Individual Sports Outdoor Sports Racquet Sports Team Sports Water Sports Winter Sports Boomers ■ Gen X ■ Millennials Gen Z Source: SFIA Topline Participation Report 2022 72 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Community Priorities and Needs OVERVIEW OUTREACH OVERVIEW A major component of the Master Plan is to develop an outreach strategy that is an engaging collaborative process with the community, stakeholders, and City staff. The outreach strategy developed for this project explored various methods to engage the community through a series of workshops, surveys, stakeholder interviews, focus/user groups meetings, and online engagement through the City's website. The target audience of the outreach strategy was anyone who lives, works, or plays within the City of Meni- fee. Additional emphasis was placed on under -served communities that disproportionately lack easy and comfortable access to parks, open space, and other recreation facilities. The team also used the City's da- tabase of previous resident and stakeholder involvement to maximize outreach. OUTREACH STRATEGY The primary community engagement strategies for this plan were; >> Project branding » City staff meetings >> Statistically -valid survey Ten stakeholder/focus group interviews Three community workshops 'FIGURE 4-1: Community Engagement Timeline 74 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN 807 353 Total Completed Invite Surveys Surveys Complete Community Workshops Stakeholder/Focus Group Meetings 293 161 Open Link Surveys Event Surveys Complete Complete COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER INPUT The Master Plan's outreach strategy sought to in- volve a list of key stakeholders and focus groups to gather information from a broad list of community members, including: » Community Partners » City Council » City Department Heads and Directors » Planning and Recreation Commission » Senior Advisory Committee » Sports Users (focus group) » Quail Valley (focus group) » Oasis HOA » Sun City Civic Association » Youth Leaders of Menifee STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS Stakeholder and focus group interviews were conducted in -person during the 2022 summer. The goal of these interviews were to gather input on needs and desires of these community groups. This input, in combination with other community input from the survey and workshops, was used to guide recommendations in Chapter 6 of the document. A series of questions were asked during each of the stakeholder meetings and some of the collective themes and responses included: Question 1: What are the key recreation values in the community that should be considered while de- veloping the Parks Master Plan? » A need for multi -generational parks. » Having amenities and activities for children, teens, adults, and seniors is important. Question 2: What would be the top three outcomes you would like to see from this planning process? » Improvements and infill at already existing parks within the City. » Additional aquatic facilities and programs (outside of HOAs) and better promotion of Drop Zone » The need for a regional sports park. Question 3: What do you feel is the role of the City in providing programs in addition to recreation fa- cilities? » Keeping costs down so they can work with the organizations and paperwork minimized. Question 4: What should the collective vision of the City be and how can your group help achieve that vision? Short-term vision (0-5 years): » Add joint -use agreements (JUA's) with school districts to allow the community to use school facilities when they are not in use, such as aquat- ic facilities. Mid-term vision (5-10 years): » A new park or recreation facility in Quail Valley and Sun City. Long-term vision (10+ years): » The need for a regional trail system and connec- tivity between parks. Question 5: What groups in the community are currently receiving the most benefits from Meni- fee's recreational programs? » There are many youth programs but there could be additional programs and facilities to support them like additional lighted -multi -purpose fields and lighted diamond fields. Question 6: What groups (e.g., age, socioeconom- ic, sporting focus groups, etc.) could receive more support from the parks master plan? » City needs have outgrown the capacity of the Kay Ceniceros Senior Center. Kay Ceniceros Se- nior Center is too small. A strong desire for additional indoor facilities like community centers and recreation centers to support programs and events. As well as a need for a teen/youth center and an additional senior center. Question 7: Should the City continue their pursuit in acquiring, operating, and maintaining all of the Valley -Wide parks that exist within the City of Meni- fee? » Keep pursuing bringing Valley -Wide parks into the City park system. 76 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN "We need to absorb all of Valley -Wide Parks within the City • boundary." - Parks, Recreation and Trails Commissioner ,Z "City parks should be connected and feel like they are part of a combined system." - Planning Commissioner "Need more lit sporting fields so that after school programs and team practices can occur more in the evenings when it is dark." - Parks, Recreation and Trails 1 Commissioner "Community pool/agic Center is also a must for Menifee." - Parks, Recreation and Trails Commissioner "We need to support all age groups for family values and quality of life" - Parks, Recreation and Trails Commissioner "'Parks Make Life Better' covers the values of physical, mental, and social health and well-being." - Planning Commissioner "ADA compYWe, the whole family should enjoy park amenities." - Senior Advisory Committee Member ►. "Accessibility for Special Needs (walkers, wheelchairs)" - Community Partner COMMUNITY SURVEY Three samples were collected in the survey ef- fort, the statistically -valid invite sample, the open link sample, and the event sample (administered at public events). Together they provide an excel- lent source of input from the community on top- ics addressed through the survey. Survey results are presented in formats that compare responses from each sample, along with an overall response. In general, responses across samples are similar, a positive finding in that it indicates a more general consensus in the community on the various topics and ideas expressed. These surveys were conducted as a part of the Master Plan. The general purpose was to gather feedback from residents and other park users on City parks, recreation facilities, amenities, future planning, communication, and more. The survey and analysis was designed to assist the City of Menifee in developing a parks and recreation plan that accurately reflects the needs, wants, and de- sires of the community. The survey opted to use a traditional method of sur- veying by mailing surveys to 4,000 households in the City. INVITE - 353 SURVEYS Paper surveys were mailed to a random sample of residential addresses in Menifee, with instructions of how to complete through a password -pro- tected website. A reminder postcard was also sent. URVEY CRY OF MEWFEF PAIL a.caPLAN srr.rarn�..ar�r00 10 OPEN LINK - 293 SURVEYS An online survey was made available to all Menitee residents (inc.lucling non -county residents) �A�r�.rrr�•w1A,+a.rarr...,�y.IwatYr — • OD ..��--�ti...►a ®--awr.�„raa-'a+.a,arar EVENT - 161 SURVEYS A shortened version of the survey was distrib- uted at City Events and the results were tabulated as a seper- ate source of data. 78 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Key Findings Awareness: Awareness of which agency manages local parks is low; 42 percent of the Invite sample is not at all aware of who manages their closest facilities and/ or parks. A total of 21 percent of the invite samples live in an HOA. Of those that �:— do, Oasis, Heritage Lakes, and Tierra Shores were commonly mentioned. Satisfaction: Respondents show higher levels of satisfaction with the parks, rec- reation facilities, and services provided by the City of Menifee. Overall, the aver- age ratings for all samples were above 3.5 out of 5, with 5 being "very satisfied." Most Visited: The top three most visited parks are Audie Murphy Ranch Sports Park/Skate Park, Spirit Park, and Wheatfield Park. The top parks in need of im- provement that respondents suggested are Wheatfield Park and Aldergate Park, both under Valley -Wide authority. Transportation: Majority of respondents use a motor vehicle to get to parks and _ recreation facilities. However, over half of the Invite sample (55 percent) said that o p they walk or run and 19 percent said they bike or skateboard. Connections: A strong indication that if additional trail connections, paths, walk- ways, and/or street crossings were developed, respondents would more likely �- - - •� walk or bike to access parks. A total of 38 percent of the invite sample said stron- j• - • • • , connections would definitely would encourage them to walk or ride more of - en. Trails and pathways: Trails and pathways, amenities at City parks, and open park spaces are rated highest by both samples in terms of importance. Although trails and pathways rated highest in importance, their rating for meeting the needs of the community is lower. However, open spaces and amenities at City parks are currently meeting the needs of the community. Aquatic programs rated the lowest in terms of needs met. Other Desired Facilities: Other recreational facilities desired by the open link and event respondents are walking trails or interpretive trails and splashpads. Recreational facilities desired by the invite sample are community gardens and dog parks. But the top most desired park amenity in the future is walking trails, both inside and outside parks. Communication: Respondents overall suggest that there is room for improve- ment in terms of how news and information is shared with the community about parks and recreation opportunities. The top three preferred forms of communica- tion are Menifee Matters Newsletter, email, and social media. O Safety and Security: All samples indicated that the main purposes of the City of Menifee Parks and Recreation is to provide a high level of safety and security at fa- cilities, and to ensure park and recreation facilities are accessible to all residents. Spanish -speakers: Approximately 83 percent of respondents indicated that they use Spanish as a second language. Meaning, it would be beneficial to programs, services and communication to be available in Spanish. COMMUNITY PRIORITIES & NEEDS 79 FIGURE 4-2: Most Visited Park Facilities Pet cent Responding: Weekly Uw"114y Afpt.•J&, a Pvor onoea year City ofMenifee Invite 334kIF,10% 18% MJLS% _26% 4% parks or facilities Open Link 242@7% 27% _26% =126% 3% My local HOA Invite 28711111% 19% ■10% SPIS96 3?0 parks or facilities Open Link 21017% 21% -1S% 2240 4% Valley -Wide Invite 30314% 16% .10% 20% 8% parks or facilities Open Link 22015% 21% =18% 259b b° b 14Ym't nxd k' pdSl VVJW 28% 1140 42% 31% 42% FIGURE 4-3: Visitors likeness to use trails and pedestrian connections if they were developed? 25% '.'•�� Ooen Link Overall 5 - Definitely would SS% 42% 4 - Probably would 29% 30% 8096 3- Neutral / No change _17% Ms% 11M38% 2 - Probably would not-i0% M 10% =10% 1 - Definitely would not 07% P 5qb 06% Avg, 3.8 4.0 3.9 n= 336 239 575 FIGURE 4-4: The importance of facilitates and services offered by City of Menifee Parks Trails and pathways Amenities at City parks (e.g. picnic areas, playgrounds) Open park spaces Special events Youth recreation and sports programs Athletic courts (e.g, basketball, tennis) Athletic fields (e.g., baseball, soccer) Aquatic programs Community centers Adult recreation and sports programs Senior programs Kids club/camps ADA-accessible programs ..•MEMO n= n=142n=679 n=302 n=22 .'.t n=141 n=665 n=Z96 ,t=222 n=134 n=652 n=292 n=212 n=134 n=638 n=285 n=21$ n=134 n=631 n=Z98 nil n=139 n=653 n=296 n=21 n=134 n=646 n=282 n=214 _ n=134 r n=630 n=296 n--7336 n=652 n=289 n=132 n=632 n=291 n=205 n=138 n=634 n=283 n=20 n=132 n=617 n=274 n=195 n=128 n=597 80 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FIGURE 4-5: Facilitates and Services Importance/Needs Met Matrix Summary High Importance/ Low Needs Met These are key areas for potential improvements. Improving these facilities/ programs would likely positively affect the degree to which community needs are met overall. High Importance/ High Needs Met These amenities are important to most respondents and should be maintained in the future but are less of a priority for improvements as needs are currently being adequately met. These "niche" facilities/programs have a Current levels of support appear to be adequate. small but passionate following, so measuring Future discussions evaluating whether the participation when planning for future resources supporting these facilities/programs improvements may prove to be valuable. outweigh the benefits may be constructive. Low Importance/ Low Importance/ Low Needs Met High Needs Met As a summary, the High Importance / Low Needs Met quadrant highlights the results of the survey where trails are important to residents but lacks in amenities. FIGURE 4-6: Facilities and Services Importance/Needs Met Matrix Invite 4.2 4.1 4.0 M C 3.9 4-1 co Q� 3.8 d C 4-1 lu 3.7 Average I-i:;a,tance Rating - --------------- 0 E 36 3 5 Adult uatic programs sports programs 3-4 D 32 Open park spaces i AthieticfieMs.e�g-,-basebalf,-soccer) Athletic courts (e.g., basketball, tennis)e 0 Community centers *senior programs Average Needs Met Rating 25 2.6 27 28 29 30 31 32 3.3 34 3.5 3.6 37 38 39 Meets Needs Rating Source: RRC Associates COMMUNITY PRIORITIES & NEEDS 81 COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS The three Community Workshops as a part of the Master Plan took place from July 2022 - December 2022. They enabled community members to par- ticipate in the planning process and speak direct- ly to the project team to provide there input about current and future park needs and desires. Some items mentioned by participants in the workshops were not yet heard by other forms of community engagement that the Project Team conducted. goo C"y OF MENIFEE PARKS "MASTER .f PLAN WNA)ISA [AIR[ MUM .t MA[KR►Wl7 1 wNVtl Zsf sraw., sou.y,,,w„enyP+.nl 4 a11 RO/[CiA -aPoE[N' [xls is "us su,�Mmr. ....,"". �" 9w•y.`„b� arc 4�'"AVAIL4111oftillit? AM ti''�OA teyl� Wh/w mlv..y �'I+flt taM[f WAYS i"AT I C 'L�Typ.;.�Mxfne NAr ARE l�r+ MM.y1'a..4 fib. ��r ET INVOLV[D? a IR h.=.=. IZY OF MINER ` ppRKS MASj 09 P`AN Ott �6UttS�p ��t.R9��r"�am N w.N N'lel/" Workshop #1: July 21, 2022 Location: Kay Ceniceros Senior Center The first workshop was held on July 21, 2022 and it served as an official kick-off to the Master Plan. The planning team presented an overview of the planning process and initial inventory findings. The participants were then broken out into small groups to discuss the following topics: 1. Current usage of parks 2. General conditions of parks used 3. Overall satisfaction with park experience 4. Value you place on parks and park components 5. Your vision of the future park system The Project Team presenting to participants at Workshop #1. Workshop participants pointing out frequently visited park on a map at Workshop #L 82 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Workshop #2: September 22nd, 2022 Location: Mt. San Jacinto College The second workshop was held on September 22, 2022 at Mt San Jacinto College to present the ex- isting conditions analysis. The team then held an interactive activity which included asking which amenities residents want to see in the City. The top four amenities the participants wanted to see are: 1. Aquatic facilities 2. Amphitheater/outdoor stage 3. Walking trails/multi-use paths 4. Playgrounds/other play amenities Participants were then asked to place on a map where they want to see the top four amenities. tie -0 The Project Team discussing with residents about desired ame- nities they want to see at City Parks at Workshop #2. 40 01 Workshop #3: December 1st, 2022 Location: City Hall Council Chambers The third workshop was held on December 1, 2022. The project team presented draft recommenda- tions to the Park and Recreation Commission in a public workshop setting at the Council Chambers. The team presented the future conditions mapping and findings along with a summary of the second workshop activities and findings. The commission- ers gave feedback and suggestions for the recom- mendations on the project. The Project Team presenting to the Parks and Recreation Com- missioners at Workshop #3. o4D �c ©o or COMMUNITY PRIORITIES & NEEDS 83 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT KEY TRENDS TOP 3 DESIRES FROM WORKSHOPS: �t Pickleball Courts TOP 3 DESIRES FROM STAKEHOLDERS: Regional Sports Park or Destination Park Aquatic Facilities Aquatic Facilities Facilities to Support Programs 1� me All TOP 3 DESIRES FROM SURVEY: Amenities at City Parks (Playgrounds and Group Picnic Areas) Trails and Walking/ Running Paths Adult Recreation and Sport Programs 84 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Future Conditions FUTURE CONDITIONS AND EXISTING FACILITIES This chapter analyzes Menifee's projected 2035 future population and how its existing parks system will serve the future population. Looking at the City's future projected population is an important part of the planning process because it helps understand how the current and planned park system will serve the rap- idly -growing City. This chapter uses 2035 Southern California Associations of Government (SCAG) population estimates and planned residential housing projects provided by the City to project the future population. This chapter also looks at data derived from the NRPA's Agency Performance Review resource. While NRPA's resources are not overarching solutions, they provide insightful metrics that can be useful with the Parks Commission's aversion to NRPA comparisons. These guidelines are advisory, allowing the City to compare itself to others nationally. Using NRPA metrics and community input allows the project team to make informed and custom decisions that reflect the unique needs of the City in the recommendations section of the Master Plan. Table 5-1 shows the future level of service for the projected 2035 population provided by the current park system, with the addition of planned future park projects. The acreage of planned park projects totals 68.92 acres. Several of these planned park projects are shown later in this chapter. The additional 68.92 acres will add to the future LOS, but the City will have 376.9 park acres in deficit to reach its five acres per 1,000 pop- ulation goal by 2035. As seen in Table 5-2, the future level of service for the 2035 population shows that the City will be lacking in several additional amenities that it was previously meeting according to the NRPA Standards (national averages) for. This includes, but is not limited to, recreation centers, teen centers, nature centers, perfor- mance amphitheaters, community gardens, lighted multi -purpose fields, swimming pools, splashpads, ten- nis courts, and volleyball. Although Table 5-2 shows some of these deficits based on the NRPA Standards, the team has further ana- lyzed and adjusted the recommended City standard based on findings from the community needs assess- ment (Chapter 4), national and local recreation trends, and recreation participation data. TABLE 5-1: Future Level of Service (2035) Existing and Planned Parks TOTALCITYWIDE PARKS AND VALLEY- EXISTING AND RECOMMENDED ACRE PER 000 ACRES IN WIDE PARKS (WITHOUT HOA PLANNED STANDARD PER SURPLUS POPULATION DEFICIT FACILITIES) PARK ACRES 000 POPULATION DEFICIT 2035 Developed General Purpose Parks Mini and Neighborhood Parks 132.7 2.0 1.1 (0.9) 116.5 Community Parks and Center 187.7 3.0 1.5 (1.5)1 186.0 All Active Parks 320.4 5.0 2.6 (2.4) 302.5 Special Use and Regional Park/Open Space Special Use Facility 1 01 6.0 - 1 (6.0)1- Regional Park Area 01 6.0 - 1 (6.0) - 86 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN TABLE 5-2: Future Amenity Level of Service (2035) Existing and Planned Parks y v c Gy1 G/ LL Level of Service for 2035 = = r0+ r Population 3 C z c (a LL ,, c a 0(124,567 Est. Pop.) CL m C 0 C W C `-' 0 1L N c W C L4 r 0 a a+ > 0 W 0. W 1 0 1 12 2.0 Z J .�. 12 12 51,265 51,000 12.4 (0.4) Recreation Center Community Centers 0 2 1 3.0 55,136 55,000 2.3 0.7 Senior Center 1 0 0 1.0 120,062 120,000 1.0 0.0 Teen Center 0 0 0 0.0 152,714 152,000 0.8 (0.8) Nature Centers 0 0 0 0.0 119,206 119,000 1.0 (1.0) Performance Amphitheaters 1 0 0 1.0 111,226 111,000 1.1 (0.1) Basketball Courts 15.5 4 13 32.5 8,870 4,435 28.1 4.4 Lighted Basketball Court 10.5 2 4 16.5 8,870 4,435 28.1 (11.6) Community Gardens 1 0 0 1.0 66,341 66,341 1.9 (0.9) Diamond Fields (softball/baseball) 4 4 17 25.0 41,829 20,000 72 18.8 Lighted Diamond Fields (softball/baseball) 3 4 7 14A 14,429 14,429 8.6 5.4 Dog Parks 1 0 1 2.0 75,805 75,805 1.6 0.4 Multi -purpose Field 9 9 7 25.0 6,250 6,250 19.9 5.1 Lighted Multi -purpose Field 4 9 7 20.0 6,250 6,250 19.9 0.1 Pickleball 11 4 4 19.0 30,502 5,000 24.9 (5.9) Lighted Pickleball Court 8 4 2 14.0 30,502 5,000 24.9 (10.9) Picnic Areas (12+people) 30 8 16 54.0 5,000 5,000 24.9 29.1 Playgrounds (age 6-12) 19 5 15 39.0 4,936 4,936 25.2 13.8 Playgrounds (tot lot/age 2-5) 16 3 12 31.0 19,978 19,978 6.2 24.8 Skate Parks/Bike Parks 2 0 0 2.0 103,438 103,438 1.2 0.8 Swimming Pool 0 1 0 1.0 69,051 69,051 1.8 (0.8) ' Splash pad/sprayground 0 2 0 2.0 - 35,000 3.6 (1.6) Tennis Courts 4 1 5 10.0 Z264 7,264 17.1 (7.1) Lighted Tennis Court _ 3 2 3 8.0 7,264 7,264 17.1 (9.1) 1 1 2 4.0 22,250 5.6 (1.6) Volleyball 22,250 Walking Path 15 5 9 29.0 - 6,000 0.0 29.0 Exercise Area 10 0 0 10.0 - 12,000 0.0 10.0 18 3 10 31.0 - 10,000 0.0 31.0 Restroom Building Notes: "Planned facilities are to be completed in the next 3-5 years. Gray lines indicate lighted amenities of the above amenity FUTURE CONDITIONS 87 FIGURE 5-1: Future Residenti it Land, use with Existimg Paths Future Residential Land Uses 1 t Single Family Residential • "' 1 'r 1 Multi -Family & Mixed Residential Mobile Homes and Trailer Parks Rural Residential 7 1 , 1 1 1 � 1 e , 1 1 IN I I� 1 1+ t 1 1 - - - - - - - -1 -- I � 1 t 1 _ � 1 1 1 t 1 1 , I 1 ♦ 1 1 1 I 1 � J I - I � I I I 1 r , '- - - - - - - - - - - • 1 1 1 1 , i• 1 1 1 1 • � 1 1 . , 1 I , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 i -----�---------- 1 ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1 Existing City Parks Valley -Wide Parks City Parks 1/2 mile Walkshed This map shows the existing parks in the City of Menifee and the 112 mile walksheds overlaid with the future resi- Valley-Wide Parks 1!2 mile Walkshed dential land use. There are several new planned develop- ments that will increase the population and create a need for more park and recreation facilities. 0 F 0 4 Miles 88 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FIGURE 5-2: Future Residential Land use and Future and Existing Parks Future Residential Land Uses Single Family Residential ------------------------ 1 Multi -Family & Mixed Residential I 1 ' Mobile Homes and Trailer Parks 1 Rural Residential I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 ' 1 ' + .'-t 1 ♦ 1 ' 1 1 1 I 1 / � 1 t 1 1 1 t 1 t ' 1 1 1 � 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 � ► 1 1 � 1 I - 1 •I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 '- - - - - - - - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -' RMIIII Existing City Parks Future Planned City Parks This map shows the existing and future planned Valley -Wide Parks parks 112 mile walkshed, along with the future land use. There are 8 planned projects, adding an City Parks 112 mile Walkshed additional 68.92 acres to the existing park system. Future City Parks 1/2 mile Walkshed Valley-1Mde Parks 1/2 mile Walkshed 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T---1 0 1 2 4 Miles FUTURE CONDITIONS 89 PLANNED Pi 00^ IC/'`TC Menifee is one of the fastest -growing cities in the State of California due to various newly planned de- velopments in progress. Several of these developers are including parks on their project sites or paying into impact fees for new park development. Below are some of the conceptual park plans included in these new developments and other planned parks. Developments building parks to meet the parkland dedications requirements will work with City staff to ensure that the park amenities meet the existing and future needs of residents and will be required to provide adequate shading for the park and play- ground areas to enhance the safety and usability of play structures all year round. Note: These plans are conceptual and are likely to evolve prior to construction by the developer. Walking Loop Legado Park Conceptual plan Legado Legado is a large mixed -use planned development currently in the planning process. The development will include 1,022 new residential home lots on 216 total acres. It will also include 20-acres of commer- cial land uses and a 26 acre detention basin. The southwest section of the development is where the 12.88-acre community park will be located. Below is a conceptual plan of the facilities. Proposed draft concept of the future park includes: Three lighted multi -purpose fields Community center Playground Three mile trail loop around the development Playground Community Center 90 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Cimarron Ridge Other Planned Developer Park Projects: The Cimarron Ridge Specific Plan includes a net- Menifee Valley Sports Park work of community parks, pocket parks, natural Cantelena Park open space areas and water quality basins. Menifee North Specific Plan Park Proposed draft concept of the future community park includes: Soccer/multi-purpose fields Baseball field Restroom facilities Playground and tot lots Picnic areas Cimarron Ridge Park Conceptual plan FUTURE CONDITIONS 91 As part of the analysis, it is very important to also examine the future projected City demographics, vacant land, and future growth areas within the City. This analysis can help determine the future recreation needs of current and future Menifee res- idents. This chapter highlights the future growth trends and changes in the City's residential pop- ulation. These needs, deficiencies, and population changes should influence the City's park, recre- ation, and trail planning through 2035. After 2035, a new park master plan would be needed to ac- commodate long-term future changes in the City's demographics. The City's growth rate has been on the rise for over a decade and that trend is not expected to slow down in the near future. SCAG provides several resources for population growth projections for jurisdictional planning with the City's boundary. However, to provide a more accurate future popu- lation projection, the City's actual active residential development projects were reviewed to determine geographically where the future population would be located and how many new residential units will be added to the current population. Based on the current active residential develop- ment projects in Menifee, provided by the City, there are projected to be about 6,000 new units of housing to be built. The average household size in the City, according to the US 2020 Census Bureau, is 2.99 persons per household. This will add an AVERAGE kOUSEkOID 6,000 2.99 * City of Menifee 2023 Annual Budget Southern California's growing suburban development additional 17,940 people to the current population. The distribution of the new population is shown in Figure 5-3. The future population will be distributed mainly in currently vacant areas and not much infill residen- tial development is projected to occur. As Figure 5-3 shows, some of the new developments will have new parks within them, but not others. The new population in these previously vacant areas will create a need for increased park acreage in these areas, as neighborhood parks, as well as a need for more community parks. r,7,940 F106,627 92 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FIGURE 5-3: Future Residential Development and Future Parks ------------------------ -------------- 1 , 1 1 r t� 1 1 I 11 1 �1 low" 'VI I 1 I r 1 1 . 1 � 1 � 1 1 1 , I 1 1 / 1 1 � I ,1 1 I I 1 - 1 ---------- .. �; 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 I r 1 1 1 � r r r I � 1 1 1 ---------- I------'----------r 1 1 1 Future Planned Parks r ________ 1 t , Population Projection of Future Development < 250 Future Residential Land Uses 250 - 500 Single Family Residential 500 - 2000 Multi -Family & Mixed Residential i 2000 - 5000 Mobile Homes and Trailer Parks Ell > 5000 Rural Residential 1 1 City Boundary 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 4 Miles This map shows the projected population of each planned development in Menifee. It also shows the planned park projects. As the map shows, many of the new developments include a new park, includ- ing many of the larger developments. The planned parks will add 68.92 acres to the existing LOS. But, the planned parks still don't add enough park acreage to offset the population projection. FUTURE CONDITIONS 93 FUTURE LEVEL Or c1:RVICE NEEDc The future LOS needs analysis is a study to deter- mine which park amenities will have a higher fu- ture demand. The analysis provided an adjustment calculator to the NRPA Standards (national averag- es) to determine a foretasted demand resulting in the "Recommended City Standards" amount in the LOS amenities Table exists in Table 5-3. The adjustment calculator is based on three overall areas: Trends, User Data, and Recreation Participa- tion. The Trends data came from the following four TABLE 5-3: Level of Service Adjustment Table reports or analyses: the 2022 Sports, Fitness, and Leisure Activities (SFIA) Topline Participation Re- port, the 2021 Outdoor Participation Trends Report from Outdoor Foundation, ESRI Business Analyst - Recreations Trends in Menifee, and a compara- tive analysis of four other Southern California cities. The user data came from the following four inputs, Workshop #1, Workshop #2, Stakeholder input, and survey input. The recreation input was analyzed from the actual recreation program class numbers and registrants numbers provided by the City. The results of this analysis adjust the needs for each amenity based on these input factors. The re- sults of this adjustment to the LOS amenities Table is shown in Table 5-4. FACILITY / AMENITY CW < z a 0.57 0.70 G HIGH HIGH F Q HIGH z d U HIGH Recreation Center Community Center Senior Center 0.80 NEUTRAL HIGH HIGH Teens Center 0.80 NEUTRAL HIGH HIGH Nature Center 1.10 NEUTRAL LOW NEUTRAL Performance Amphitheater 0.90 NEUTRAL HIGH NEUTRAL Basketball Court 0.80 HIGH NEUTRAL HIGH Lighted Basketball Court 0.90 NEUTRAL NEUTRAL HIGH Community Garden 1.00 HIGH LOW NEUTRAL Diamond Fields (softball/baseball) 0.80 NEUTRAL I HIGH HIGH Lighted Diamond Field (softball/baseball) 0.80 NEUTRAL HIGH I HIGH Dog Park 0.90 NEUTRAL I HIGH NEUTRAL Multi -purpose Field 0.70 HIGH HIGH i HIGH Lighted Multi -purpose Field 0.80 NEUTRAL HIGH HIGH Pickleball Court 0.73 HIGH NEUTRAL Lighted Pickleball Court 0.70 HIGH HIGH HIGH Picnic Area (12+ eople) 1.10 LOW 1 NEUTRAL NEUTRAL Playground (age 6-12) 1.00 LOW HIGH NEUTRAL Playground (tot lot/age 2-5) 1.00 NEUTRAL NEUTRAL NEUTRAL Skate Park Swimming Pool 0.90 0.73 NEUTRAL I HIGH HIGH NEUTRAL NEUTRAL Splashpad/Sprayground 0.70 HIGH HIGH HIGH • Tennis Court 0.90 NEUTRAL NEUTRAL HIGH Lighted Tennis Court 0.80 NEUTRAL LOW NEUTRAL NEUTRAL NEUTRAL HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH I NEUTRAL HIGH , NEUTRAL NEUTRAL I NEUTRAL I NEUTRAL Volle ball 1.00 Walking Path 0.90 Exercise Area 0.90 Restroom Building 1.00 Gray lines indicate lighted amenities of the above amenity 94 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN TABLE 5-4: Future Level of Service Table with Adjustment N I c -r- I W � W Z Q V O 0 N QLL. 0 Q a o H W Z Vf Z N 0 U LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR 2035 = !2> z W o POPULATION a a 3 ? W U H UJ (1,222 EST. POP.) z = o o_ V V > N - C 99 W Q W �d C9 O x Q Ld W W Z� H� O W Z Z d 0 N Z 0 N IL N Z y Q F W 1 J O Q H F Q H Q Q > Q W W d W O Z J Q L �./ O O Recreation Center 1 0 1 2.0 51,265 0.57 29,050 4.3 (2.3) (0.2) Community Center 0 1 2 J 1 3.0 55,136 0.70 38,595 3.2 Senior Center 1 0 0 1.0 120,062 0.80 96,050 1.3 (0.3) Teens Center 0 0 0 0.0 ;wf 152,714 0.80 122,171 1.0 (1.0) Nature Center 0 0 0 0.0 119,206 1.10 131,127 0.9 (0.9) Performance Amphitheater 1 0 0 1.0 111,226 0.90 1 100,103 1.2 (0.2) Basketball Court 15.5 4 13 32.5 8,870 0.80 7,096 17.6 14.9 Lighted Basketball Court 10.5 2 4 16.5 8,870 0.90 7,983 15.6 0.9 Community Garden 1 0 0 1.0 66,341 1.00 66,341 1.9 (0.9) Diamond Field (softball/baseball) 4 4 17 25.0 41,829 0.80 33,463 3.7 21.3 3 4 7 14.0 14,429 0.80 11,543 10.8 3.2 Lighted Diamond Field (softball/baseball) 2.0 75,805 0.90 68,225 1.8 0.2 Dog Park 1 0 1 Multi -purpose Field 9 9 7 25.0 6,250 0.70 4,375 28.5 (3.5) Lighted Multi -purpose Field 4 9 7 20.0 6,250 0.80 5,000 24.9 (4.9) _ _ Pickleball Court 11 4 4 19.0 51000 0.73 3,667 34.0 (15.0) Lighted Pickleball Court 8 4 2 14.0 5,000 0.70 3,500 35.6 (21.6) Picnic Area (12+people) 30 8 16 54.0 5,000 1.10 5,500 22.6 31.4 Playground (age 6-12) 19 5 15 39.0 4,936 1.00 4,936 25.2 13.8 Playground (tot lot/age 2-5) 16 3 12 31.0 19,978 1.00 19,978 6.2 24.8 Skate Park 2 0 0 2.0 103,438 0.90 93,094 1.3 0.7 Swimming Pool 0 1 0 1.0? 69,051 0.73 50,637 2.5 (1.5) Splashpad/Sprayground 1 1 0 2.0 "• 35,000 0.70 24,500 5.1 (3.1) Tennis Court 4 1 5 10.0 7,264 0.90 6,538 19.1 (9.1) Lighted Tennis Court 3 2 3 8.0 7,264 0.80 7,264 17.1 (9.1) Volleyball 1 1 2 4.0 22,250 1.00 22,250 5.6 (1.6) Walking Path 15 5 9 29.0 6,000 0.90 5,400 23.1 5.9 Exercise Area 10 0 0 10.0 12,000 0.90 1 10,800 11.5 (1.5) 18 3 10 31.0 10,000 1.00 1 10,000 12.5 18.5 Restroom Building Notes: "Planned facilities are to be completed in the next 3-5 years. Gray lines indicate lighted amenities of the above amenity TOP 4 MOST PICKLEBALL TENNIS COURTS FUTURE CONDITIONS 95 FUTURE POPULATIW1 BASED SERVICE AAIAI VC1C A population -based service analysis was done for future conditions based on future planned residen- tial development provided by the City. Park pres- sure is defined and a park needs assessment was conducted. Existing and Future Park Pressure "Park Pressure" is a mapping study that analyzes park size of existing parks in relation to population density and quantifies how population density af- fects parks by capturing the potential demand. This study assumes that residents are mostly using the park located closest to them, especially in regards to neighborhood parks. This process was done by using the park 1/2 mile walkshed around all public parks and including the residential land uses that fall within the park walkshed and the calculated population. The population of each park walkshed was calculated to estimate the potential park us- ers within the park walkshed. The acreage of the park was then used to estimate the number of park acres available per 1,000 residents within the park walkshed. The analysis characterizes areas of the City that either meet, failed to meet, or exceed the population LOS. Existing park pressure in the City is shown in Fig- ure 5-4. The figure shows the areas with the highest concentration of parks have the lowest park pres- sure and the areas with fewer parks have the most park pressure. Future park pressure is shown in Figure 5-5. Future park pressure combines the existing and future planned parks with the projected 2035 City popu- lation. The future park pressure analysis shows that the areas with new development are going to have increased park pressure, regardless of the new planned parks to be constructed. 1/2 WALKSHED 2035 OF EXISTING AND POPULATION PLANNED PARKS DENSITY PARK STANDARD 5 ACRES/1000 POPULATION [FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 96 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FIGURE 5-4: Existing Park Pressure (2020 population) ---------------------- 44 , I > ' � I r `.� City-wide Parks Valley -Wide Parks Park Pressue ® 100% + greater than 75-100 , 50-75 ------' •----------, , 25 - 50 0.01- 24.9 percent more than than park standard Meets park standard -0.01- -24.9 percent less than park standard -49.9 - -25 -74.9 - -50 -75 + less than City Boundary 1- - J 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 4 Miles FUTURE CONDITIONS 97 FIGURE 5-5: Future Park Pressure (2035 population) ------------------------ -------------- i i L ' Future Planned Parks -; � t1 City-wide Parks ; Valley -Wide Parks Park Pressure ' 100% + greater than i �- 75 - 100 i i i 25 50 '-------------------- - - - - -- '-- 0.01- 24.9 percent more than than park standard Meets park standard -0.01- -24.9 percent less than park standard -49 - -25 -74 - -50 F-1 -100 - -75 �- - City Boundary 0 1 1 j I I I I I I 0 1 2 4 Miles 98 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN This Future Park Pressure Map shows that many of the areas experiencing new development will have in- creased pressure, meaning more residents will be using the parks, creating a greater need for more park acres. Adding additional parks in the future would help offset the population growth. The City has several potential infill areas that could be considered for a new park site. Figure 5-6 shows both City -owned vacant land and privately owned vacant land that City staff helped identify that may be suitable for potential new parks. Infill site "F" is a former HOA park that could be a key area to help close the park gap in Quail Valley, as identified in the park needs assessment. Site "A" is currently a City -owned parcel and may be suit- able for a future neighborhood park. It is a 2.18-acre parcel located off Goetz Road in Quail Valley. Both sites "A" and "F" are key infill areas that can assist in closing the park gap that currently exists in Quail Valley. Infill site "H" is a 1.6-acre area located behind an existing Church in Sun City, north of Cherry Hills Golf Course. Infill site "C" is a parcel that was for- mally a part of the Sun City Golf Course. It is a large 13.7-acre parcel that could be a key location for a potential community park to help fill the existing gap in the Sun City area. Infill site "D" is located just north of Gale Webb, Kids-R-#1, Action Sports Park and west of Paloma Valley High School. It is currently five parcels that equal a total of 24.4 acres. This is another opportu- nity area for a large community park with commu- nity amenities. Infill Site "B" can be acquired by the City since it is currently on the County's default property tax list. It is located on a steep hillside and may only be suit- able for trail development or natural open space because of the topography. Infill site "E" is a future park site, along with residential units on Murrieta Road and would fill a gap in this north-western part of the City. An additional community center opportunity in- cludes County owned property next to the Menifee Library (Infill Site "I"). In addition to the existing partnership with Santa Rosa Academy and MSJC, the City has identified several potential future partnerships with schools and private facilities. The City will continue its joint - use agreement with MSJC to continue allowing public use of its amenities with residents during specific hours during the year. The City will con- tinue its facility -use agreement with Santa Rosa Academy to allow for use of the gymnasium and other facilities for recreational programs provided by the City. MSJC Stadium Facility FUTURE CONDITIONS 99 FIGURE 5-6: Potential Parcels for Future Proposed Park and Community Center Infill ---------------------- 1' 1 , ---------------- 1 , ' 1 1 ' E ' 1 ' 1 ' �1 Former Sun , City Golfer ' 4ith Lutheran Course , Ohurch Property , G , Canyon Heights o i` former HOA Park Hillside open s space area Goetz Rd and Proposed Menifee I� ' Juanita Rd Community Center '------- Site ' ' � 1 , 1 , '------ - - - - - . , Evans Craig Phase , 1 ' O Key Infill Sites 1 - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - , , Infill Potential (City -owned) ED Infill Potential j City-wide Parks The infill potential map shows existing City -owned i Valley -Wide Parks vacant properties and several existing private- ly -owned vacant properties that may be suitable for Future Planned Parks new park sites. Key infill areas are highlighted where City Parks 1/2 Mile Walkshed park infill is most critical based on the existing and future park walkshed and current and future park Valley -Wide Parks 1/2 Mile Walkshed pressure. It is most critical in the future to develop new parks where the existing park walkshed do not Future Planned Parks 1/2 Mile Walkshed reach, like in Quail Valley. 00 1 2 4 Miles 100 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN POTENTIAL TRAILS, PARK CONNECTION.. AND r1Dr-kl 11Zonr-$: The proposed trails and bike facilities shown in Fig- ure 5-7 are the proposed trails and bike facilities identified in the City of Menifee Active Transporta- tion Plan (ATP) that was completed in December 2020. It includes an extensive bike network that recommends a total of 93 new bike projects which equates to 183.3 miles of new bikeways. Many of these proposed bike facilities connect to existing parks, which provide an alternative form of trans- portation to parks. Parks and open spaces were cri- teria in the ATP for connectivity and prioritization. Where feasible, the ATP identified off-street con- nections to City and the public identified destina- tions such as schools, parks, open space, retail, and transit. Previous planning efforts proposed a soft -surface trail that would connect two Valley -Wide parks: Lago Vista Sports Park and Hidden Meadows Park. It would continue south along the eastern side of Bell Mountain and end at the corner of Menifee Road and Garbani Road. There is potential for an additional trail along Menifee Road running north to south across the City. Multi -use trails that can be used for walking, biking, and sometimes equestri- ans like the Salt Creek and Paloma Wash Trail are Soft -surface Trail in Menifee the preferred active transportation connections since they are bicycle and pedestrian -friendly for people of all ages and abilities, especially for trans- portation -based trips. Soft -surface trails can also be used for transportation such as those at Audie Murphy Ranch. Natural surface trails are primarily found in the City's open spaces. Open spaces such as Bell Mountain and Quail Val- ley open spaces offer hiking through an informal trail system. These informal trails were created by people hiking to reach the peaks, and heavy use formed the trail network over time. A formal trail can be found on Menifee Mountain where the Cross Hike Trail travels to the peak of Menifee Mountain with informal trailheads along Menifee Road at AI- dergate Park and one at Simpson Road. While these open spaces are not owned by the City of Menifee, coordination between the City and landowners is key to preserving these open spaces for public use. For trail planning in these open spaces, specific plans can be developed to help define a trail net- work, identify sensitive areas, and develop mea- sures to preserve natural resources and habitats. Amenities that could benefit the City and provide education may include interpretive signage, educa- tional kiosks, and formalized trailheads. A defined trail network can help discourage walking or bicy- cling through sensitive areas and can help preserve these resources. Programs such as interpretive walks and school field trips may also provide addi- tional educational opportunities. Salt Creek Trail Crossing FUTURE CONDITIONS 101 There are existing resources in the Menifee Valley area that are unique and have great expressions of the local geology, landform, and natural open space systems. Most of the areas shown in Figure 5-7 are likely to be under private control. The intent of this planning exercise is not to restrict development or interfere with private property but to understand that large undeveloped parcels are likely to get de- veloped. With potential trail corridors identified in the Park, Recreation and Trails Master Plan, the City could request, through a discretionary process with willing partners, the dedication of a trail easement or construction of a public trail system itself as part of the development. The location of the trails and possible trailheads shown are based upon existing visible trails or in some cases, new trails needed to create a network with loops and connections to existing trails. A sub- stantial effort will be needed to identify the owner- ship, development potential, parcel size, and likely zoning or amended zoning requested for develop- ment in order to determine the size of the devel- opment and the level of the discretionary process needed as well as a local shortage of trails, recre- ation facilities, and open space. These conceptual Paloma Wash Trail, a multi -use path corridors and trailhead locations are a starting point and are based solely on the undeveloped resourc- es that would create a positive and healthy outdoor experience and preserve the heritage, context, and character of Menifee through some preservation, stewardship, and access to these areas. When pos- sible, existing parks and existing trails have been shown as being better connected through these conceptual trail areas. Infill Site B, identified in Fig- ure 5-6, is a great location for a trailhead and trail connection to the North Canyon Hills. In addition, park and open space connectivity can be even more beneficial when these resources are linked by non -motorized connections. These can be implemented by the use of on -street facilities such as bike lanes, sidewalks, and multi -use paths. While the City's ATP does recommend citywide connec- tions, exploring trail connections through undevel- oped parcels, easements and even reconfiguring on -street improvements for multi -use paths can provide a safe and well-connected trail network. Examples include completing the Salt Creek trail to the City's eastern boundary and connecting the Paloma Wash Trail to the Salt Creek Trail. 102 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FIGURE 5-7: Potential Park Connections, Non -vehicular Trails, and Open Space 1 GenbeB Low 1 t 2. Kahan to Powerline _ to RTA Area �y J �,' s 1 1. KabrpA.grea.� 1 `4. M � ius, — iL 1 i 1 I PeakaN Creek � Area +.- \`{ • + ' - }-} & Mason ountain AnAm — 'id I .. 1 l r Z Qaloma High 1 � a , 9chool Area I - I Mountel � 1 - 1 I 1 1 • ' 1 11 1 ♦%------------; -.. 5. Eastside Peak and Creek Area Area 1 9. Southeast Creek Area � A a 10. Ram Ranch Area Future Planned Parks Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections City-wide Parks APotential Trailhead Locations Valley-Wide Parks Potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections Salt Creek Trail — = Existing Segment Potential Open Space Trails Future Segment Potential Greenbelt Loop This map shows potential non -vehicular con- nections between parks, a greenbelt loop, trails, Boundary Potential Open Space Areas trailheads, and open spaces. 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 Miles Trail Development Guidance: 1. The City should take a long-term approach for trail development by identifying possible trail systems that would benefit the public and help to preserve the natural open space of canyons, hillsides, mountains, creeks, and unique geo- logic areas regardless of current ownership. At- tempting to add trail systems in areas other than publicly owned lands or public right-of-ways is always challenging. It is counterproductive to consider public trails on private lands that are already developed or a series of small parcels. Large parcels with development potential that are next to or include open space areas should be conditioned with trail development or recre- ation in -lieu fees or dedication of easements. 2. Priorities for trails systems should include prox- imity to parks, adjacency to residential popula- tions and in areas where existing open space with amenities such as rock outcrops, expres- sive geology, wetlands, creeks, riparian areas, hills, valleys, and peaks with views. 3. Trails should consider overall trail lengths with that include multiple loops and an overall net- work of options that meet a wide range of abil- ities. Daily exercise loops and connections of hiking, walking, or jogging that allow a varying range of distances, terrain, and access points. 4. Pre -planning for trails is not an infringement on private property rights if the property is planned for future development, especially if it is a dis- cretionary action and needs to mitigate impacts to the natural community by setting aside or en- hancing some portion of the site. Often, develop- ers understand the benefits of trail systems and are often willing to work them into development plans. Lack of planning for trails will result in lost opportunities or disconnected segments of trails and connections. 5. Trail planning should use overall corridors of connection that provide flexibility for the agen- cy or developer needing to decide on the best locations in a development to build trails. Trails should get priority to be provided in areas where natural open spaces occur, connections to de- veloper -built parks, or to other trails, schools, or places of social gatherings. 6. Railroad corridors, excess right-of-way, flood control channels and utility corridors along with linear public right of ways can be used for trails if the responsible agency or utility company can limit risk, agency access and maintenance is- sues. 7. Trails can be a variety of surfaces such as grav- el, natural soil, decomposed granite, asphalt, or concrete. Hiking trails can also vary in width such as single-track open space trails between 1'-3' wide; shared use open space trails between 2'-4' wide and multi -use trail for bikes, runners, and hikers between 10'-12.' If surfaces are hard, consider side trails for hiking or running of an- other 4' width. 8. There are multiple areas around the City that represent opportunities for combining trails with natural open space, mountains, peaks, vistas, creeks that can connect to parks, residential ar- eas, and othertrails. It maytake longerto wait for development to occur, but in the case of Meni- fee, the most feasible method of implementation is associated with development projects. Other public lands and right-of-way are also very feasi- ble, especially with available grant money. 9. Linear trails systems can qualify as linear parks if they include recreational amenities and unique natural characteristics. Exercise courses, ad- venture facilities, climbing, bouldering, balanc- ing, zip -lines, equestrian uses, mountain biking, BMX, pump tracks or other nature -based activi- ties are amenities that can be included. Open space hiking trails in Menifee 104 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Recommendations RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WILL HELP MENIFEE PLAN FOR THE FUTURE The Master Plan process allowed the project team to take a comprehensive look at the existing parks and recreation programs that the City offers. The Park LOS analysis and the needs adjustment LOS analysis, the community engagement process, stakeholder and focus group discussions, the comparative analysis, and the NRPA metrics provided valuable insight into prioritizing city-wide recommendations. This chapter provides a guide and vision for how Menifee can continue to plan, design, and implement park -related projects and programs. There are a total of seven overall recommendations including; 1. Facilities and Amenities 2. Programs and Services 3. Administrative 4. Financial 5. Trails, Connectivity, and Open Space 6. Placemaking 7. Technology Each recommendation has a set of distinct action items to help achieve the overarching goals of increasing the LOS, park distribution, amenity distribution, and quality of the park and recreation system. The Master Plan also provides timeframes for each action item. This chapter also provides guidance of infill opportu- nities in under-utilized areas of several existing parks and the amenities or features that can fit given ap- proximate size requirements. The chapter provides strategies to partner with schools to lower deficiencies and geographic distribution of neighborhood and community parks. Finally, the affordability of recreational programs and services, upgrading programs and service delivery, improving organizational efficiencies, and augmenting financial opportunities will expand and improve efficiencies of the park system. The general recommendations are further described in Appendix C and include capital operational costs, impacts, fund- ing sources, and timelines for completion. Picnic area at Centennial Park 106 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN h: OVERALL RECOMMENDATION STRATEGIES facilities andq,,, . � s H I :=I eoi4 ®ro sGonnecti�#,,N i 1_ m Cams an(y Nt 421 Finan,i a/ �• 5 • Pdministrati` e .,A jechnolo9y RECOMMENDATIONS 107 STRATEGY 1 FACILITIES AND AMENITIES A variety of different facilities and amenities at parks are essential to a person's experience of a park. Park amenities like sports fields, playgrounds, courts, and picnic areas are typical but important elements for people to seek out. Park assets like benches, trash cans, and picnic tables allow users to engage in a park at a smaller scale. Maintaining the right balance between active and passive park elements is critical for the success of the city's park system. 1.1 Consider improvements/infill of City owned Parks a. Explore ways to add facilities at existing City owned properties, focused on improving Level of Service and mitigating park needs in park -poor areas. b. Reference Appendix B infill opportunity maps for where these opportunity areas ex- ist. c. Explore the possibility of divesting from properties that may have limited use in the future. d. Create a phased plan for infill in established parks and create Concept Plans for each in - fill area. e. Implement infill projects. 1.2 Include aquatic facilities (i.e., splash/ spray pads) ------------------------ -� , r ; Potential future parkshed if all recommended infill areas were developed as parks. a. Find areas within existing parks for splash pads or spray features. b. Implement agreements with facilities such as the Drop Zone in Perris and increase public awareness in Menifee publications. c. Consider joint use agreements with schools and other private facilities to help increase aquatic facilities and distribution. d. Consider a city -owned facility that has aquatic features without duplicating facilities at the nearby Drop Zone. 108 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN 1.3 Address deferred maintenance throughout the City a. Perform a facility condition assessment to determine necessary maintenance to bring facilities into good condition or to determine capital investment needs. b. Create and implement a park maintenance schedule based on an asset management system for regu- larly scheduled maintenance and/or replacement of park amenities. c. Evaluate the list annually to create priorities to be addressed and incorporate into the capital improve- ment plan. d. Consider CAPRA Accreditation to continue to build a comprehensive management system and opera- tional best practices. e. Consider outsourcing service repairs as needed to meet the demand for deferred maintenance. f. Maximize energy efficiency and sustainability (ex. recycling bins) in the design and construction of new parks, amenities, and major renovations. Explore the use of green energy such as solar panels in parking lots and buildings. aa.••a •a •aa .Y �, JJ ., •t t�1 n l J .) • = f 1 nrC t. ��} •1�J�uCtC �' rrl�J�Ot •�� `f•M � f�0�♦ \ Picnic Table at E.L. Pete Petersen Park Path at La Ladera Park 1.4 Improve the current Level of Service throughout the City a. Reference the infill opportunity maps in Appendix C and Infill Recommendations Table 6-2 for areas to address with level of service gaps within the City. b. Review at the top five priority LOS amenities and implement. c. Refine the planning process to ensure developer -built parks are where they are needed and include the amenities that are likely needed including local park amenity shortages. d. Look at shifting developer impact fees into community parks that resolve local deficiencies and im- proves equitable distribution of parks. RECOMMENDATIONS 109 1.5 Explore adding indoor facilities at existing or new recreation/community, teen, and senior centers a. Find underutilized areas within the key growth areas of the City for additional indoor facilities, that can address indoor recreational programs especially for teens and seniors. b. Consider joint -use facilities to provide more teen and senior indoor uses. c. Explore adding recreation facilities in areas within the City that show gaps. d. Develop guidelines that can help flag opportunities for park amenities and trails for areas not considered parks, but that are public ROW or unimproved public spaces. e. Review and update park design standards to include best practices for playground safety including ap- propriate levels of shade covering. Existing Lazy Creek Recreation Center 1.6 Develop flexible -use fields a. Explore areas at existing and future parks for multi -purpose fields and open space. 1.7 Provide multi -purpose courts and combine court standards to accommodate trends that support more variety in court sports a. Identify existing courts that can be converted to multi -purpose courts with an emphasis on Pickleball. b. Prioritize multi -purpose courts in areas where LOS is lacking. c. Explore areas to add multi -purpose courts including line striping for sports that are growing in demand. Example of Multi -use Sport Courts Example of Multi -purpose Field 110 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN 1.8 Explore Partnerships to Develop Regional Parks a. Explore the development of regional open space park with educational nature center and hiking trails. b, Explore the development of regional sports park with diamond fields and multi -purpose fields, `� _ 1 ��- , r-n' �� s�r + a.i h xiwa'•.'• ,�. x may,. Existing Open Space area in Menifee Existing Open Space area in Menifee •, I . , V - •�, ?fit � ., ,Cr"Z�'.{ RECOMMENDATIONS III STRATEGY 2 PROGRAMS AND SERVICES High quality programs and services within the city's parks and recreation system is a vital component of the Master Plan. They allow residents of all age groups and abilities to participate in a variety of different programs and activities. A broad range of programs and activities allows the community to stay engaged and keeps the parks activated year-round. 2.1 Expand programs and services a. Consider expanding youth and teen programs. b. Expand sports programs to include soccer, baseball, and girls' softball. Continue to monitor sports program trends and interest. c. Develop a recreation program plan that includes a service matrix, activity development and selection process, and other requirements found in CAPRA standards. d. Continue to offer and expand program opportunities for aquatics, indoor fitness, pickleball, and cultural a rts. e. Promote active lifestyles by enhancing and increasing aquatic exercise and fitness programs. 2.2 Explore more diverse programs a. Explore classes that use the outdoor fitness and exercise equipment in programmable spaces. b. Use contracted instructors to offer enhanced fitness programming in parks across the City. c. Explore cultural arts programs. d. Include young adults programs. e. Increase and enhance programs for individuals with disabilities. Consider programmatic ADA inclusion requirements. 04— ,.!" Vn .•. �. vwl.- ` Menifee flag football program as I ' City Of Me ncfee °1 City of Menifee Tent for Dia de los Muertos event 112 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN 2.3 Enhance special event programming a. Offer special events in different areas throughout the City that will contribute to a sense of community and help make each park the hub of each neighborhood. b. Work with existing community groups for each neighborhood to assist with planning special events in parks. c. Invest in a formal sponsorship program for events and activities. At a minimum, develop a policy and tools to assist staff with recruiting program sponsors. d. Enhance and offer special cultural events programs. e. Explore creating a signature community event that could help develop the City's unique identity as pro- posed in the City Council Strategic Visioning Plan. Movie in the Park Event at Centennial Park 2.4 Continue to work with other service providers to develop programs and services to meet demand and trends a. Invest in and develop an automated and real-time sports field reservation system. b. Develop a joint use agreement with the school districts and ensure the partnership is equitable. c. Coordinate with local and City sports group recreation providers. 2.5 Enhance educational and nature/environmental programs a. Enhance the park ranger program that highlights nature interpretation opportunities (i.e., camp fire pro- grams, nature walks, etc.) b. Develop partnerships with environmental advocacy groups to offer environmental education programs and camps. c. Establish educational opportunities in convenient locations to promote gardening and local food pro- duction (consider ties with 4-H Youth Development Program). d. Collaborate with schools and educators to create outdoor "classroom" space in parks near schools. RECOMMENDATIONS 113 2.6 Continue to monitor affordability of programs and services a. Consider scholarship opportunities for students. b. Evaluate non-resident program participation to ensure non-resident participants are paying appropriate and equitable fees. c. Develop a resource allocation and cost recovery policy to ensure equitable use of City resources for recreation. 2.7 Expand indoor programs and increase opportunities for seniors, young adults, and teens at community centers a. Offer additional enrichment classes for seniors, using contract or volunteer instructors to maintain af- fordability. When a facility is multi -generational, various age groups can interact and help each other (i.e. book reading by seniors for children or technology help from teens for seniors.) b. Increase and improve Senior Center activities focusing on social services, social activities, transporta- tion and information and referral for healthcare and other services. c. Enhance and improve enrichment programs that offer development opportunities related to job skills, personal improvement, and academic success. d. Evaluate parking opportunities at the Senior Center to ensure appropriate spaces are reserved and avail- able during program and event times. 2.8 Continue to evaluate the quality and mix of programs and services a. Develop a consistent and equitable manner of community member engagement to determine recreation desires and needs. b. Ensure engagement processes include residents who live in the southern portion of the City. c. Conduct an annual on-line survey to establish trends in participant satisfaction. d. Expand patron evaluation process, adult sports and youth sports to include post program surveys and comment cards. e. Establish customer service response goals to ensure patrons receive timely responses to complaints or suggestions. An r Youth Leaders of Menifee 114 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN 2.9 Communicate recreation opportunities to City residents a. Develop a marketing plan that includes outreach, pricing, promotion, program mix, and social media. b. Develop a social media plan that aligns with current trends and update continually c. Enhance communication with the Youth Leaders of Menifee. d• Improve existing use of the City's webpage to assist residents to remain up to date on recreation pro- gram opportunities. e. Continue to use and enhance an equity lens when marketing programs, with specific emphasis on pro- gram promotion in cultural events. COs+v�aeetr fNtIQ!/ N/N ss�sa sr■.■ s�. s�■w{`ra a. CA Vegas f"teMR a IntoTes,od In dhpl■,Ina.,t.-k? f9'I)127-1{IO MENIFEE CLIiLKzTS*CT17PfWhVR us Existing and Previous Program and Event Fliers tIII1 A N E SATURDAY, 0 U11TL MARCH 25, 2023 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. %a �) I r Co.e explorc this N.)ly- ee}.� friendly eve■t that exhibits ■ feral diversity a■d troditloeal heritage. 4 Live Entattai"MMa4t Dance !Performances ` Chiidlen'sActiv&ei . food and Craft Vendors BASKETBALL CAMP a WEEK SESSIONS FOOTWORK I MALL HANOLINO I e OTINO FOAM 1 A SO MUCH 4C MoopM-7:oopm 7 Sop. A Sop- 2AN • FEE 22 • • MARCH ■ -F"' la 4A9L" WEDNESDAIS Weo' .T Y. � � Imo• City of Menifee ART-A-FAIRE 'L I.L.\(:K 111S,1'01,1) MONTH ry Cenicem CenOef 2999s Evans Rood MKjfee, CA 92586 ■ Y or MENIFEE RECOMMENDATIONS 115 .^1E.3 STRATEGY 3 �1ADMINISTRATION m The administrative elements of a park and recreation system are the "behind the scenes" operations that determine the success of a park, facility, or program. The administrative responsibilities range from how the system operates current lease agreements with other recreational providers or joint -use agreements. Other administrative items include staffing, volunteering, or management items. An understanding of how the City's administration operates allows for recommendations for improvement. 3.1 Expand potential park amenities owned and operated by the City a. Continue to explore unifying Valley -Wide Parks into City-wide Park System. b. Evaluate land for potential purchase and re -purposing as parkland. 3.2 Improve partnerships and joint use agreements a. Develop a joint use agreement plan with one or more of the school districts within Menifee. b. Look at strategic partnerships with organizations such as non -profits. c. Generate partnerships with organizations that can help with park maintenance and clean-up. 3.3 Staff appropriately to meet current demand and maintain established quality service a. Address the need for additional maintenance staff and resources at additional parks or upgraded facil- ities. b. Research additional staff resources and alternatives to the current staffing methods. c. Create new maintenance positions within the Community Services Department. d. Encourage staff certification as a Certified Park and Recreational Professional (CRPR) or Certified Park and Recreational Executive (CPRE) through the NRPA. Mt San Jacinto College - Stadium Aldergate Dog Park - Valley -Wide Park 116 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN 3.4 Explore additional partnerships to assist with funding, volunteering, and marketing a. Develop relationships with local businesses, clubs, and organizations to seek funding, volunteers, and marketing support to expand programs and facilities. b. Find volunteers to help operate and run programs. c. Review current contacts with partners and seek out new public/private partnerships to enhance ame- nities. d. Identify partnerships with other organizations that can provide additional programming space. 3.5 Evaluate and address staffing levels a. Align staffing levels with future park, facility, and programming enhancements. b. Identify current performance standards. 3.6 Improve internal and external communication about division activities, events and services a. Utilize a number of marketing tools and strategies to actively promote parks and recreation services. b. Increase social media presence, school flyers, and hire interns to assist with social media marketing and promotions. c. Engage all segments of the community in the marketing efforts. 3.7 Explore making the facility and park rental fee easier a. Review fees annually to ensure they are equitable and the collec- tion of fees is resulting in appropriate cost recovery. Group picnic area at Spirit Park L Youth Leaders of Menifee volunteering at event RECOMMENDATIONS 117 STRATEGY 4 FINANCIA1: Financial resources are one of the most important parts of having a successful park and recreation system. It is essential to have a healthy and well-balanced financial system in any park and recreation system. This not only includes an understanding of how the park and recreation system runs on a daily basis, but how the city at large operates. A general understanding of other financial externalities helps to complete the picture of how the financial elements of the park system may be improved. The analysis of the current health and operations of the financial system allows for future recommendations on areas of possible savings and where funding may need to be increased. 4.1 Continue the implementation of an asset management system a. Implement an asset management system to manage and track equipment and inventory to improve budget planning. b. Create and update a data -driven plan for identifying, evaluating, and managing park assets. c. Annually, inventory and create a condition assessment for each asset in the parks and recreation system. Establish photo -inventory and GIS mapping. The inventory must include cost, installation year, and a life -cycle for each asset. d. Complete an annual risk assessment to determinethe cost of maintenance and operations, replacement, and consequences if each asset fails. Determine maintenance and operations cost at each year of the asset's life -cycle (based on the level of service for each asset), e. Annually, incorporate data from the asset management plan and process into capital and operating budgets. 4.2 Explore additional funding options a. Consider potential mechanisms to support and pay for operations and maintenance of parks and facil- ities. b. Consider the potential support for bond referendum to fund multiple/capital projects. FIGURE 6-1: Financial Revenues and Expenses for Parks and Recreation of the 2023 Fiscal Year Classes Rentals r1 Senior Programs i Youth Programs Sports Programs €J $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 ■ Revenue Total Costs e Difference 118 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN c. Consider internal budget and opportunities to ask/seek additional funding to support improvements in the maintenance and care of City parks and facilities to improve the standard throughout the community. d. Evaluate the non-resident fee structure and consider adjusting fees to ensure non-residents are paying the entire cost of programs, rentals, and activities they participate in. e. Review contracts with partners and seek out new public/private partnerships as a means to enhance the variety of recreational programs available to the community. f. Explore opportunities to increase Cost Recovery at City facilities. Evaluate current fee structure, ongoing expenses, and options for new revenue streams. g. Continue to seek alternative funding source that includes donations, grants, and others forms of spon- sorship. h. Communication with current sponsors and donors should be conducted on a regular basis to ensure their continued positive relationships with the City. i. The Department should use the results of the fee study completed during the master planning process as a guide for exploring new funding opportunities. j. Seek increased General Fund allocations to address recommendations from the Master Plan. 4.3 Explore opportunities to increase sponsorships a. Build on existing sponsorships as well as pursue local entities to support events and a scholarship fund. b. Ensure all existing and future sponsorships are accurately portrayed in a signed sponsorship agreement. c. Increase community awareness of the existing Adopt -A -Park program. d. Establish media sponsors and multi -year agreements as priority. 4.4 Track grants and charitable opportunities a. Consider contracting with a dedicated grant writer to research, submit, and track federal, regional, state, and local grants. b. Consider utilizing professional grant writing resources to pursue grant opportunities. c. Continue to research, submit, and track federal, regional, state, and local grants. d. Continue tracking NRPA, CRNA, OGALS, LWCF, CRPS, American Trails, and Education in Arts webpag- es for grant resources. e. Utilize NRPA's Foundation Center for links to thousands of grant opportunities, grant education and train- ing. W_�Iq_"qw RECOMMENDATIONS 119 STRATEGY 5 TRAILS, CONNECTIVITY, AND OPEN SPACE Implementing trail connections between parks and where people live allows residents to easily access parks while providing them with exercise and outdoor experiences. Survey respondents indicated that if there was bike or pedestrian infrastructure to parks, they'd be more willing to walk or bike to parks rather than drive a vehicle. 5.1 Coordinate with Public Works to follow recommendations in the ATP a. Implement Tier One and Tier Two projects from the ATP for connections to community and neighbor- hood parks. b. Implement Safe Routes to School recommendations to provide access to neighborhood and mini parks near schools. c. Coordinate grant pursuits aimed at Safe Routes to Schools that will benefit access to nearby parks. 5.2 Enhance connections and entries to parks a. Identify corridors or areas where linear parks, additional traffic calming, and bicycle and pedestrian im- provements are needed. b. Close sidewalk and curb ramp gaps within a quarter mile of parks. c. Incorporate park access recommendations into the City's Complete Streets Plan Update. d. Explore off-street trails and other non -motorized connections between parks and open spaces. e. Coordinate with developers to integrate trails in future projects, especially if adjacent or near parks, open space, or an existing trail. f. Develop an established trail system in open spaces for educational and recreational use. 5.3 Develop linear parks a. Through the Complete Streets Plan Update process, identify corridors or areas where linear parks may occur and can be implemented. b. Reclaim underutilized streets and/or infrastructure within the City. 5.4 Connect to urban trails outside of the City a. Complete a feasibility study and implement the Salt Creek Trail east of Antelope Road to the City limits in coordination with Riverside County. This trail is identified as a regional connector by WRCOG. Sample of a linear park that also provides connection and movement 120 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN b. Coordinate the connection to the Salt Creek Trail west of Goetz Road with the City of Canyon Lake. This trail is identified as a regional connector by WRCOG. c. Implement bike lane projects that connect outside of the City. d. Expand Paloma Wash Trail to connect to the Salt Creek Trail 5.5 Coordinate with Public Works to provide complete streets that include walkable and bike friendly networks throughout the City, especially those that lead to parks a. Encourage developers to provide walkable and bikeable infrastructure. b. Provide more protected bike lanes and bike facilities as recommended by the ATP. c. Provide more walking trails and close sidewalk gaps. d. Implement traffic calming elements on streets that connect to parks and schools. e. Implement enhanced crossing opportunities near parks such as curb extensions or rectangular rapid flashing beacons. f. Encourage smart growth in areas that have adequate parks. If inadequate parks, encourage parks to be built by the smart growth. g. Review opportunities to acquire land to develop nature based or natural open space parks. h. Conserve open space through continued stewardship such as increasing interpretive and educational programming. 5.6 Develop a comprehensive trail network a. Identify potential trail systems that would benefit the public and help to preserve the natural open space of canyons, hillsides, mountains, creeks, and unique geologic areas regardless of current ownership. b. Prioritize and combine the trails system to be in close proximity to parks, adjacent to residential popula- tions, open space, vistas, creeks, mountains, and areas of social gathering. c. Consider multiple loops and an overall network of options that meet a wide range of abilities when de- veloping trails. d. Map trail corridors that provide flexibility for the agency or developers needing to decide on the best locations to build trails. e. Explore railroad corridors, excess right-of-ways, flood control channels and utility corridors along with linear public right-of-ways for trail feasibility. f. Explore linear parks that may qualify as trails if they include recreational amenities and unique natural characteristics. g. Develop a dedicated Trails Master Plan. h. Upon identification of a new project, compare parcels with maps in Appendix E for possible trail devel- opment considerations such as construction easements or developer lead implementation. _.Appp 40 Existing Salt Creek Trail Street Crossing RECOMMENDATIONS 121 F�7 STRATEGY 6 -•o= PLACEMAKING Placemaking helps give public places an identity by creating a sense of place for the broader community. It capitalizes on the community's character to help define a space. It creates opportunities in public spaces to bring people together and engages the community. Placemaking can be achieved in various ways. It is typi- cally derived from the history, culture, and heritage of a place that can be enhanced through art, vegetation, architecture, scale, and others. It is further enhanced through the interaction between people and the park elements. Community engagement and social infrastructure 6.1 Include public art a. Encourage public art that's representative of the community. b. Allocate areas within parks for art opportunities. 6.2 Encourage social interaction a. Incorporate public plazas and gathering areas within the public realm. b. Provide areas for family gatherings and events. c. Continue to create programmed activities that encourage social interaction (i.e., movies in the park, hol- iday events, etc.) d. Conduct a Regional Event Assessment and creation of a signature event. 6.3 Increase identity and relation of the local natural context and built environment a. Identify and bring out the history and culture of the site and City. b. Include informational signage that identifies the character of the park. c. Incorporate entry monuments or gateways into parks to aid in park identity. d. Extend the natural environment into the park and park uses into natural non -sensitive open spaces. 6.4 Enhance character a. Capture unique characteristics of the City that can be incorporated into each park. b. Integrate park theme and character into features and buildings. Include placemaking at part of the re- view of future projects for integration. c. Look to surrounding context and integrate into the character of the park. Public art and parks add variety, character and interpretation for kids as well as for adults. Menifee's Moonlight Markets at Central Park 122 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN STRATEGY 7 TECHNOLOGY Technology is an integral part of people's everyday lives. Technology can be used to the advantage of resi- dents and city staff to communicate with the community. For parks, technology should be leveraged in many ways to better the park and recreation system ranging from data collection to program announcements. This includes integrating the technology and recommendation from the City's Broadband Master Plan. 7.1 Organize digital files and develop a Citywide GIS databases a. Work on a technology plan that establishes a digital record system for CAD and Building Information Modeling (BIM) files. b. Continue to build the City's GIS database for all of the City's mapped data and build on the mapping from this study. c. Work with the Menifee Police Department to collect and map crime data to monitor safety and public property damage issues. 7.2 Increase usage of security systems within the park system a. Develop a technology plan to increase security cameras. b. Prioritize parks where safety concerns and other major issues are mentioned. c. Increase the presence of park rangers and staff in parks of concern. 7.3 Update and enhance digital scheduling and facility management tools a. Research and explore digital scheduling and facility management platforms. b. Set up a digital workflow for park planning, budgeting and implementation as well as maintenance and replacements. c. Explore a marketing and communications plan for customer/resident use of the system. 7.4 Include virtual programs, events, and activities a. Research and explore platforms to host virtual events. b. Establish working platforms and share events with the community. c. Work with existing community center classes to incorporate virtual programming. 1,CH IMJW AN fl VIRTUAL MATURE HUD PAREMT flMD ME CLR661 T'$ll7CP P 61111 ClILDIN: 9CVft6PMOT V 5CV 6CnT17R+CC PnU C1[PIIV;TT ,. AGES 2 TO 4 FF[Dal o u 00 am TO 10 00 An $20, T'LG: S-ESSION SE5510N is GF7-bd25 SESSION a: 7Q-7123 •tiFill d r. IVt6 11 nAUntL CIRV KIr rnlnv,nrolnn PPPTICPnTIC'IE TPCUIP',6 MENIFEE FOR MORE INFORMATION (9S11723 3980 WWW CITVOFMENIFEE US/REGISTER Virtual Program Flyers W" year sva 1W• 1WW- ftlile Class 1: Ago 4-5 Class 2: Ayes 5-6 ►O�MOsrlrc RECOMMENDATIONS 123 SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS POTENTIAL INFILL OPPORTUNITY AREAS Figure 6-2 shows the existing amenity gaps in the City and the future potential infill sites for new parks. Showing all the overlapping amenity gaps allows the City to prioritize what new amenities to add at existing park infill areas and key infill sites to prioritize development for new parks. For example, in the northern por- tion of the City, a major sport court and diamond field gaps is present where an existing park, Nova Park, and a future planned park, Cimarron Ridge Park, are located. To help fill this gap, the City should consider adding sports courts and diamond fields to these parks. The City can also identify what amenities to prioritize and incorporate at new park opportunity sites. For example, if the key infill sites A and F in Quail Valley were to be developed as new parks it would help to fill a major parkshed gap. The City can use this map to prioritize what amenities to include in these new parks. Overlapping Amenity Gap Key Legend Playgrounds Sport Courts Multi -purpose A Diamond ' Community 1 Fields Fields Centers Multi -purpose Field at Nova Park 124 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN FIGURE 64:Overlapping Amenity Gaps with Potential Infill Opportunity Areas This map is designed to show where the amenity -specific needs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - j='- are within the community and the existing parksheds with the po- • - ® ; tential 112 mile walkshed of the potential new infill parks. These amenity gaps were identified in chapter three of the Master Plan. 1 �1 s 1 few 1 1 J ' D 1 r t dp r . 1 1 1 1 OKey Infill Sites Potential New Infill Parks All Existing and Planned Parks Potential New Infill Parks 1/2 mile Walkshed All Existing and Planned Park 1/2 mile Walksheds City Boundary J r 100 2 Overlapping Amenity Gap Key Legend Multi - Playgrounds ISPort Courts purpose Fields Diamond , Community Fields Centers 4 Miles RECOMMENDATIONS 125 INFILL AMENITY OPPORTUNITY AREAS This Master Plan incorporates a thorough analysis of infill opportunity areas for each park site throughout the City. These amenity infill opportunities and areas are further analyzed in Appendix B. Figure 6-3 shows an example of Nova Park's infill opportunity areas and Table 6-1 shows the potential infill amenities that could be suited for the infill areas. Example Infill Amenity Opportunity Map and Table from Appendix B Nova Park Area 1: 10,007 square feet Located on the northeast corner of the park's large open grass central area and playground equipment on the south edge. Area 2: 5,556 square feet Located on the southeast corner of the park's large open grass central area and playground equipment on the north edge. Area 3: 1,438 square feet Located on the northwest corner of the park's large open grass central area with a shrub planter and landscape drainage swale farther west. Area 4: 897 square feet Located on the southwest corner of the park's large open grass central area with a shrub planter and landscape drainage swale farther west. FIGURE 6-3: Opportunity Areas TABLE 6-1: Infill Amenities for Nova Park Opportunity Areas OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 ✓ ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 and ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 Skate Park 4,000-10,000 ✓ ✓ Swimming Pool 1,000-10,000 Splashpad/Sprayground 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 1 4,000-16,000 ✓ ✓ Exercise Areas 500-2,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 126 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Thorough analysis reviewed various elements and geographic amenity gaps as shown on Figure 6-2, the amenity LOS deficits based on the needs assessment from Table 5-5, and the infill opportunity areas and developed recommendations for park infill within the City. Table 6-2 shows which amenities from the analysis are recommended for infill at City parks. TABLE 6-2: Infill Recommendations Table ' Q INFILL RECOMMENDATIONS Q W F > Z W N U Recreation Center didd N > Vi Q W -' Q J 0. F N W v a F Q. W Ui W Y Q U s Y Z d J= W O 0 = a, Q W Z U W N U p Q W Qcc C = Q Y a 2 Q Q Z W J U ,� Q > 0 Z LouY• Z > Z = 0 �• a W Ui > Q Q H a. Community Centers 0 U Senior Center ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� � LL Teens Canter Nature Canters Performance Amphitheater Basketball Court (K'x5j') Lighted i5asketball Court • - ■■■■■■■■m■m■�© -CommunityO Diamond Field (softball/baseball) Lighted • • Fields (softball/baseball)■■-■■--■■■■m■■� Multi -purpose •.5 ■■■■■■■m■■■■■■� Lighted Multi-Furpose Field CU U_ Pickleball Court U cz Lighted ?Eickleball Court co 0- Flaygrounds (tot lot / age 2-5) 0 Skate Parks 0 • • • • ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� • ' . • ■■■m■■■■■mm■■m� Tennis• .1 1 ■■�■■■■■■■■■■■� Lighted • ■■m■■■■■■■■■■■� Volleyball 1 1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� .... ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a Exercise m■■■■■■■■m■■■© . -..Building ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o "Note: It is recommended that the water feature at Central Park to be converted into a splashpad. Gray lines indicate lighted amenities of the above amenity RECOMMENDATIONS 127 POTENTIAL FUTURE LOS SCENARIO Table 6-3 shows a scenario future level of service amenities table if the infill recommendations on Table 6-1 were executed by 2035. Table 6-3 represents the adjusted recommended standard from Table 5-5 in Chapter 5. By strategically recommending amenities that the city is lacking according to NRPA metrics within areas that have an existing amenity gap, it has the potential to bring the City out of an amenity deficit and provide more access to all amenities throughout the entire City. Suggested infill only takes into account available open space and not current or future planned amenities. In addition, NRPA standards may not reflect local needs. For example, by recommending implementing a lighted diamond field at Nova Park, the deficit would be re- duced based on the needs assessment from -0.8 to 0.2 and it also would fill a missing gap of diamond fields in the northwest of the City shown as in Figure 6-1. Another example is the suggestion to include splash pads/spraygrounds at the locations shown in Table 6-3. By implementing these in the locations shown throughout the City it would lower the deficit based on the needs assessment from -3.1 to creating a surplus of 0.9. TABLE 6-3: Future Scenario Amenity Level of Service (2035) M Community Center 0 2 1 3.0 11 55136 38,595 3.2 0.0 (0.2) Senior Center 1 0 120,062 96,050 1.3 0.0 (0.3) Teens Center 0 0 Ej]�W 152,714 122,171 1.0 0.0 (1.0) Nature Center 0 0 0 0.0 119,206 131,127 0.9 0.0 (0.9) Performance Amphitheater 1 0 0 1.0 111,226 100,103 1.2 0.0 (0.2) Basketball Court 15.5 4 13 32.5 8,870 7,096 176 1.0 15.9 Lighted Basketball Court 10.5 2 4 1 16.5 8,870 7,983 15.6 0.0 0.9 Community Garden 1 0 0 1.0 66,341 66,341 1.9 2.0 1.1 Diamond Field (softball/baseball) 4 4 17 25.0 41,829 33,463 3.7 0.0 21.3 Lighted Diamond Field (softball/baseball) 3 4 7 14.0 14,429 11,543 10.8 1.0 4.2 Dog Park 1 0 1 2.0 75,805 68,225 1.8 0.0 0.2 Multi -purpose Field 9 9 7 25.0 6,250 6,250 19.9 1.0 6.1 Lighted Multi -purpose Field 4 9 7 20.0 6,250 6,250 19.9 1.0 1.1 Pickleball Court 11 4 4 19.0 30,502 5,000 24.9 5.0 (0.9) Lighted Pickleball Court 8 4 2 14.0 30,502 5,000 1 24.9 4.0 (6.9) Picnic Area (12+people) 30 8 16 54.0 5,000 5,500 22.6 1 2.0 33.4 Playground (age 6-12) 19 5 15 39.0 4,936 4,936 25.2 0.0 13.8 • Playground (tot lot / age 2-5) 16 3 12 31.0 19,978 19,978 6.2 0.0 24.8 Skate Park 2 0 0 2.0 103,438 93,094 1.3 0.0 0.7 • Swimming pool 0 1 0 1.0 69,051 50,637 2.5 0.0 (1.5) Splash pad/Sprayground 1 1 0 2.0 35,000 24,500 5.1 4.0 0.9 Tennis Court 4 1 5 10.0 7,264 6,538 19.1 1.0 (83) Lighted Tennis Court 3 2 3 8.0 7,264 5,811 21.4 0.0 (13.4) Volleyball 1 1 2 4.0 22,250 22,250 5.6 0.0 (1.6) Walking Paths 15 5 9 . 1 1 6,000 5,400 23.1 0.0 5.9 Exercise Areas 10 0 0 10.0 12,000 10,800 11.5 2.0 1 0.5 Restroom Building 18 3 10 31.0 10,000 10,000 12.5 0.0 1 18.5 Notes: * Planned facilities are to be completed in the next 3-5 years. ** This number is including the potential future Menifee Community Center on La Piedra Road and Menifee Road Gray lines indicate lighted amenities of the above amenity 128 CITY OF MENIFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Pofentilof 1= dUre Scenarib, Park firsvelshe is ------------------------ 1 r r r 1 , I l _ _ 1 ' 1 1 Ir-1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , 1 , /III 1 ' i �r ♦ 1 I 1 1 � _ 1 ♦, _ 1 I ♦ 1 1 - I 1 1 � 1 1 r 1 1 1 - r-- , I 1 1 ► 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -' Potential Future Parks Entire Future Potential 1/2 mile Park Walkshed Entire Future Potential 2 mile Community Park Driveshed City Boundary J Potential Scenario Parkshed Gaps r 0 r 0 2 4 Miles The Future LOS Scenario Map shows the gaps in the parkshed that will exist after the recommended infill recommendations. The City should continue to infill parks in the parkshed gaps so every resident in the community has easy access to parks. RECOMMENDATIONS 129 TABLE 6-4: Future Scenario Level of Service (2035) Figure 6-4 shows the potential scenario if all of the recommended infill areas were to be incorporated into parks in the future. The parksheds would fill in a greater percentage of the community's land area; however, there would still be continued parkshed gaps in the southern portion of the City, Quail Valley, and the north- west. This deficit can be used to require greater contributions or construction of parks by developers. Devel- opment partnering will be the primary way to close this gap. Table 6-4 shows the scenario if the recommended infill park sites were developed into parks. In this scenario, the infill sites total 60.49 acres and the City would still be 1.9 park acres short of reaching its goal of 5 park acres per 1,000 residents. The City should continue to look for potential vacant land to develop into parks in these areas to fill in the parkshed gap and come closer to reaching the LOS goal. Furthermore, it's recom- mended to consider completing a needs assessment for the park system within the next five through seven years to recalibrate the findings within this report to the aforementioned recommendations. Rainbow over Audie Murphy Ranch Sports Park multi -purpose field 130 CITY OF MEN IFEE PARKS MASTER PLAN Community Priorities & Needs Assessment Minutes & Notes City of Menifee Parks Master Plan Update Meeting Date: July 21, 2022 Topic: Meeting Minutes Meeting Topic: Workshop #1 Attendees: See sign -in sheet attachment 1. Current Usage of Parks A& MENIFEE C A L I F 0 R N I A • Central Park is used for large events. • Heritage park (Valley -Wide) is used for (soccer) pickleball (some demand is being picked up in this park). o Pickleball is huge • Centennial Park has great amenities overall. • Quail Valley (northwest) and northeast are underserved. • Lots of parks along Newport Ave have high usage and are in the east/northeast portion of Menifee. 2. General Conditions of Parks Used • Lack of lighting at some parks, specifically, La Ladera Park. • Central Park is used for large events and has limited parking. o Aldergate Park (Valley -Wide) also has limited parking. • Lazy Creek is lacking amenities. • Most parks close at sunset. • Some parks have flooding/irrigation issues. • Heritage Park (Valley -Wide) had graffiti. • Heritage park (Valley -Wide) is used for pickleball and could use more courts for tournaments. • The vinyl fencing at some parks is in need of repair. Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment • Bathrooms are in poor condition at La Ladera Park and Aldergate Park. • Spirit Park has vandalism. Need for secure doors and locks. • The city has an app where you can report safety and maintenance issues. For Valley - Wide parks, they forward the report to them. o The city should do better at publicizing this app • Play equipment with no shade gets too hot. 3. Overall Satisfaction with Park Experience • Overall, most users are happy with the existing facilities at parks. • There are no splash pads or aquatic facilities in Menifee. They are only in HOA facilities. • Parks are lacking programs for teens and the youth. • There are not enough pickleball courts for tournaments. • There is not an indoor gym/fieldhouse for activities like pickleball. • There is not enough shade at some playgrounds. The play equipment gets too hot in the afternoon and can burn children. • Maintenance needs to address the flooding and overspray at some parks. • New park facilities need to address current and future density and provide new facilities. that people don't currently have access to, or will not in the future. 4. Value you Place on Parks and Park Components • Parks are an important aspect of Menifee because they bring people together. • Residents value; Physical health, social health, mental health, and community health o Physical health through exercise o Social health through interfacing socially or through sporting activities o Mental health through contemplation and passive activities o Community health and cohesion through sporting activities and events • Residents value pickleball, dog walking, picnic areas, walking paths (linear access), and activities at parks. • Park accessibility is important to residents • Parks keep people in Menifee, but it doesn't necessarily bring people to Menifee. 5. Your Vision of the Future Park System Amenities • Shaded play areas • Shaded picnic areas without reservation • Community gym • Splash pads and pools • More climbing play equipment (ropes, obstacles courses, climbing walls and rocks) • Frisbee golf course • Amphitheater • Skateparks and pump tracks • Pickleball courts (8+) • Durable equipment • Lighting at some parks so they can be used after sunset Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment Programs: • Teen center/teen programs • Youth programs • More events at parks • Swimming lessons • Better marketing of city park events/programs Access: • Park in Quail Valley • Large regional park • Trail Connections • Multigenerational parks • Joint -use agreement to use school facilities outside school times • Parks (that) address the growing population of Menifee Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment City of Menifee Parks Master Plan Update Meeting Date: September 22, 2022 Topic: Board Comments & Meeting Minutes Meeting Topic: Workshop #2 Attendees: See sign -in sheet attachment MENIFEE C A L I F 0 R N I A Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment Board #1: Where do you live & Which park do you visit the most often? WHERE DO YOU LIVE? WHAT PARK DO YOU VISIT THE ------------------------ MOST OFTEN? ' -- --_ t P. • crew„ st r 07 nz ► i t �_._ �, I j • Legend , �' r ,.,�� 7 i .-..`N� �•1 L - i , - .�.. o.c,-w. i essay... - �ry! `� ��-•�, � -1 r�....o ,- - - � -•-'- -� i �" City of Menifee Parks Valley -Wide Recreation and Park Dlslrlct Parks ® .�b�asM ® Ynr t+-''r • >r-i�a. n0f • Mr-�rw1. •911'. ® .. �wef 1b. O :� �s� �.a. • 1rt �'. • MW W •a ® C..�. b• • .:t1 O-. b. • yyy, yl • lwMr�.n+M ® -..1w. b • ,. •,ant. M • lu�+r•.an • ; Knw.1�A • tlr la+ • vrrA VrtM..f+ • uew�v Cw.. • 1`aw>Ipsw wn �.r^:Qp L0• wra v. Ww fto • LwRf\ •ul. ' Ir • fn M.-a� ® ..n.o. •bp to- 10 I+ac+t 1.++ s Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 5 Board #2: What type of Amenities would you like to see in Menifee? ""4 � o �- • park! d— • Top 4: 1. Aquatic facilities (5 for pools & 4 for splashpads) 2. Amphitheater/stage (4) 3. Walking trails/multi-use paths (3 for walking trails & 3 for multi -use paths) 4. Playgrounds/ play amenities (2) • Others (# of votes): o Adventure playgrounds (2) o Park open spaces (2) o Community gardens (2) o Dog parks (2) o Outdoor fitness equipment (1) o Picnic areas (1) o Bike pump track/skills course (2) o Baseball fields (2) o Pickleball courts (1) o Rockwall bouldering (1) Mentions not on boards o Non -sand volleyball courts (indoor) Appendix A; Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 6 o Special needs playgrounds o Marked hiking trails with steps and ramps o Indoor gym Board #2: Where would you put the top 4 amenities in the city? PARK WALKSHEDS AND DRIVESHEDS 112 mile walksheds for neighborhood & mini -parks and 2 mile drivesheds for community parks. Ta�laavera Park, InAyW/707GO/Ift - - - pai<ttcip Y� �1mp;f{teaiu�9�q�e - want to 9# W4IKfn7,- - -r - - - - - - - , ,- -� more arnejtiiities P/aY9roun4s�PNi --- there. 1 r ; 1 Playgrotnfdg in Quail Valley , n«d,rwin.w bravo Y^ Can 'v r..� ur c�t.a,roc sy«a.vme in He nea U— rnTr ce,ue��a +h gmlo.xrr >.res me r,ol�. a+e� vane ` r r Lots of �h•� 761- overlapping „- - parksheds here yet participants ,1 still want more II amenities here. —� 1 1 Aquatic, �.-I . Facill4es ' near Hidd-�,- H ji I s'Ra Gk_,. _ .. SAORd —-----——---——--`—------1 Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 7 City of Menifee Parks Master Plan Update M E N I F E E Meeting Date: August 9, 2022 C A L 1 F O R N I A Topic: Meeting Minutes Meeting Topic: Community Partners Stakeholder Meeting Attendees: See sign -in sheet attachment Question 1: What are the key recreation values in the community that should be considered while developing the Parks Master Plan? a. Sports b. Family Activities c. Multigenerational Activities d. Pool —Aquatic Facilities e. Soccer and Softball Fields f. Park and Field Lighting g. HS starting 1 hour later now kids can't start sports until 5 PM h. Splash Pad, Aquatic Play elements i. Accessibility for Special Needs (walkers, wheelchairs) j. Inclusive Playground for wheelchairs (all abilities) k. Safety, where located and access to school sites (unwanted access) I. Heritage Sports Park is accessible, ways to get down to the fields • Lyle Marsh and Remington coming soon for accessible fields Question 2: What would be the top 3 outcomes you would like to see from this planning process? a. Field Maintenance needs to improve Closure for 3 months to reseed not acceptable • Will sprain ankles b. Skill building activities • Lifeguarding classes in town • Bring people from outside to bring resources here c. Wi-Fi access in the parks for accessibility and events d. Regional Park or sports complex, larger number of fields for tournaments Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment e. Families moving here are young with kids, waiting lists for programs and sports f. Lack of indoor sport locations, community gyms for Basketball and Volleyball Question 3: a. Sports fields so programs that are here have a place b. City should take the lead c. Working with the ones that are already here d. Safe place to play (fields) e. Enrichment activities can work together (MUSD) and help it be known f. Summer Programs are great, expand throughout the year g. Keeping costs down so they can work with the organizations and paperwork minimized h. Sponsorships or Scholarships are possible but should be available to all i. Renewable Energy sources in the parks j. Element of sustainability or adapting to the changing climate Question 4: Short a. Maintenance of the current facilities we have now b. Vision dependent on budget c. Arts Council can help with programming more than painting d. Joint Use Agreements, MOUs to infill park amenities • VW has one with Bell Mountain Middle School • Pool at PVHS for summertime programming, potential JUA • Drop Zone Waterpark was built for Menifee Residents using tax payer funding Mid a. Aquatics and Gym facilities b. Filling in Park shed gaps in QV or Sun City Long a. Aquatics facilities b. Regional Facilities c. Public Transportation to those larger regional facilities d. Land next to Library — in process of transferring to City e. Heritage Park focused on Menifee History, Cultural Center Question 5: a. Little kids are being served well b. Seniors are being served well Question 6• a. Middle years b. Teenagers, Teen Center c. Young Adults —Currently an Adult Soccer League d. Arts, Crafts, Dance, Foodie Fridays (Multigenerational) Appendix A; Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 9 Question 7: a. Valley -Wide has done a great job why should the City takeover b. Should be collaboration between the two c. City should be the sole provider so that tax dollars are guaranteed to City parks d. How would this impact areas that are currently under VW? Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 10 City of Menifee Parks Master Plan Update Meeting Date: August 9, 2022 Topic: Meeting Minutes Meeting Topic: Quail Valley Focus Group Meeting Minutes AttPnfiPPC• See sign -in sheet attachment MENIFEE C A L I F 0 R N I A General Discussion a. Expressed the interest to have partnerships with Kabian Park b. Mentioned that the area is lacking in recreational sports fields and playgrounds c. Mentioned that aquatic facilities would be good throughout the community d. Expressed interest in a community center e. Discussed the need for more senior and youth programs f. Discussed the desire for more shade in parks g. Discussed the desire for more paths and trails in community Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 11 City of Menifee Parks Master Plan Update A& M E N I F E E Meeting Date: August 10, 2022 C A L I F 0 R N I A Topic: Meeting Minutes Meeting Topic: Department Heads/Directors' Stakeholder Meeting Attendees: Armando Villa City Manager Rochelle Clayton- Assistant City Manager Jeff Melching- City Attorney Cheryl Kitzerow, Community Development Director Jonathan Nicks- Community Services Director Ron Puccinelli IT Director Chief Fire Department Lonny Olson- Fire Department / Division Chief Edward Varso- Chief of Police Nick Fidler- Public Works Director/ Engineering Bryce Howell- Park Landscape Maintenance Manager General Comments a. Shift the mentality of the developer from thinking of a development as a series of houses versus homes with all that comes with a neighborhood / community. Need to have developers think about creating a sense of place. New development is often mostly about houses instead of homes and communities. b. Park planning needs to be front and center with community planning topics and resources. c. The City has over 30,000 future lots that could be developed. d. Lagotto specific plan has a good section on planning and design guidelines that focused on creating something more than just housing. The project evolved into a much broader and comprehensive plan, with paseos and trail connections to HOA facilities. e. Walking trails are heavily used and successful. f. The Paloma trail needs to be expanded and connected more. Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 12 The City could consider a water feature for the Paloma trail and more placemaking elements and more shade. The City needs to increase thinking out of the box. Comments on the Presentation a. Add the new parks acreage to the presentation b. Add miles of trails systems to include both existing and proposed Question 1: What are the key recreation values in the community that should be considered while developing the Parks Master Plan? a. Health is a very important part of recreation? b. How can you make the parks more useable? Placemaking. Shade. More Amenities c. Fun is very important aspect of Recreation as well. Fun can come from making parks more attractive and using placemaking. d. Parks should consider more culturally based themes. e. Families are becoming more and more important in the community. f. Concentrate on useable spaces and parks. g. Based on weather, waterparks, splashpads, pools etc. are needed more. h. First responders' park / firefighters park should be considered. i. Sun City area has some homeless problems in areas that are a bit of out of sight. j. Drone racing and remote controlled vehicles should be a new use to consider. A remote control racetrack should be considered. Question 2: What would be the top 3 outcomes you would like to see from this planning process? a. Better access b. More programs c. Better maintenance d. After school programs e. Improved shade conditions f. Resurfacing problem areas (playgrounds, poor drainage fields, parking lots, paths, etc. g. Make sure that future parks are exercise / health support focused h. Consider parks for people with different abilities i. Make sure that broader public has been engaged more. Much of the population is transitory and mostly recreate on the weekend and hard to get involved in these efforts. j. Active sports are important but passive facilities are needed as well k. When building new parks, consider integrating natural and cultural resources as features I. After the city incorporated many of the rural areas that were previously handled through the county and valley district, many of these areas have park shortages, but not generally shortages of active sports -based parks. m. In the past, the mayor wanted to have a water theme park, but it was dropped when the one in Perris was developed. n. Think about small parks and small areas. o. Small track for racing remote controlled vehicles might help where they can get more involved. p. Many HOA's are being built to allow park lands to be open to all of the public. q. Some HOA's have disbanded and will need some form or replacement or supplementing. Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 13 Developers can provide some additional opportunities to create new parks that are open to the public and built by park poor areas. Appendix A; Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 14 City of Menifee Parks Master Plan Update M E N I F E E Meeting Date: August 10, 2022 C A L I F 0 R N I A Topic: Meeting Minutes Meeting Topic: Joint Planning & Rec Commission Meeting Planning Commission Attendees: David White, Chair Jeff LaDue, Vice Chair Chris Thomas, Commissioner Randy Madrid, Commissioner Benjamin Diederich, Commissioner Parks. Recreation and Trails Commission Attendees: Scott Bangle, Chair Thomas Giedroyce, Vice -Chair David Foust, Commissioner 1) Key recreation values in the community? Chris Thomas: • Proper planning • Focus on being efficient on using current park space and amenities • Variety of experiences • Well maintained parks Randy Madrid: • Park systems that support important family and social values Thomas Giedroyce: • There is unrealized value in our flood control channels and other natural lands that are not turned into parks, trails, or open space. Try to take advantage of flood control lands but need to test for feasibility and agency cooperation as well as adjacent landowners. Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 15 David White: • Parks were a key driver for why he moved here as well as many others that have moved to Menifee. Developers have done a good job of keeping up with the new population. Jeff LaDue: • New to create some destination parks that bring in others to the city and might help the local economy. Similar to the club soccer facilities known as Summers Bend in Temecula. The opportunity to build more of these active sports parks may need to look closely at potential revenue but probably needs to be in a regional park setting. David Foust: • We need to support all age groups for family values and quality of life. This would include for supporting kids and teens more with fields, ballfields, aquatics, skateparks, etc. Need more lit sporting fields so that after school programs and team practices can occur more in the evenings when it is dark. To support the value of the various age groups, more Community Centers / Sr. Centers or Teen Centers are needed. Benjamin Diedrerich: • We need to recognize the value of natural areas and open spaces that are common with a Regional Park. Newer developments have added great new parks. Qual Valley, Sun City does have major shortages that are not supporting the elderly as well. Chris Thomas: • "Parks Make Life Better" cover which covers the values of physical, mental, and social health and well-being. We need to look other more natural or regional parks to support more wellbeing and provide for more experiences than our current parks provide. For example, the County has a regional park nearby in Perris that they would like to pass onto someone else. This study should consider capturing these 639 acres of land by putting the area into the City's Zone of Influence. Part of it may be BLM land. This should be analyzed. 2) Top Outcomes you would like to see from this park planning process? Chris Thomas: • Clearly the City needs a pool or other water based activity center. A water park was considered at one time but since the City of Perris has one called the "drop zone", the City of Menifee dropped pursuing an aquatic center under the last master plan, because of the adjacent facility. • An aquatic center facility was run by the County Parks at one time (not sure what it was called or where). The center lost a lot of money. If you build an aquatic center, makes sure that you identify the true costs of construction, operations, management, and maintenance including life cycle costs for improvements. Splash pads are important and should be included here. Need larger event space areas, and dog parks. • HOAs, according to a NRPA report, showed that 95% of those that visited a park couldn't tell you who runs the park. Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 16 Benjamin Diedrerich: • Should consider a wider range of unique uses and facilities such as pump tracks, rope courses or bike skills courses. Need more lighted parks. Need several water -based cool down parks. Community pool / aquatic Center is also a must for Menifee. Chris Thomas: • Need at least one or two Regional Parks. These are important for continuing to make moving to Menifee a great return. This will help Menifee become more established and desired to move here. • Need to look at Quail Valley as another area that is park poor that needs to be addressed. David Foust: • Lots of pressure on providing more Pickleball Courts and a Pickleball tournament area. Need more cultural celebrations to occur in parks such as in Heritage Park. • Need more connectivity in trail systems (Salt Creek and Paloma Creek). We need to absorb all of Valley -Wide Parks within the City boundary. • Make sure that we accomplish a very equitable outreach effort for input on the development of parks and what facilities and programs should be provided. Youth input is problematic to get but would be useful. David White: • City parks should be connected and feel like they are part of a combined system. Randy Madrid: Seems to be going the right way. Chris Thomas: • Need to look at funding realities and provide direction with a focus on actionable items. Use good examples from other cities. Scott Bangle: • Valley -Wide needs to be addressed. Connectivity is important. Need to look at the pools and water based options. Include schools using joint use agreements. This needs to be looked at in areas where there are gaps with no parks. 3) What programs need to be considered to be added? Chris Thomas • Have not utilized many of the available programs. How well are they attended? Jonathon indicated that lazy creek programs have been tripled with the community center building improvements. The moonlight market has been well attended. The foody night is well attended. Even the more standard programs are well attended. Need more indoor facilities to be added to support more programs. Appendix A; Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 17 Randy Madrid: • Only have one sr. center. I would think that at least two more will be needed. Chris Thomas: • Supports programs. Access to facilities should be a support provided by the City. David White: • Different groups are needed to look at different demographics. Jeff LaDue: • Feels that the programs are very good. David Foust: • Great programs but need more community centers to support more programs. Benjamin Diedrerich: • More programs are needed. • Look at the Land next to the new library- County owns this extra land. Any County owned land should be looked at for possible City park facilities. 4) What is the Collective Vision for the City in terms of park and recreation facilities? Randy Madrid: • Feels that the city has been working all three phases (short term, midterm and long-term). • Sun City has been somewhat neglected. • Utilize existing parks better and joint use agreements. • Separate the feeling that all citizens are equally served well by City facilities. There are certainly the haves and the have nots regarding access to parks and access to different amenities. Chris Thomas: • Not afraid to use more money to build a better park system. Money comes to the City by people that moves here. High amenity parks will help the local economy. David Foust: • Important to be flexible. Some trends can change things quickly. Makes it difficult to plan far ahead with changing conditions. Thomas Giedroyce: • Don't want to break out individual communities and need to look out for the city wide. Need to work needs into future developer plans. Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 18 Scott Bangle: • Needs to be flexible. Needs to meet the CAPRA standards. S) Should the City continue to try to integrate Valley -Wide Parks into the City Park System? All Members: All members confirmed their support. Keep pursuing bringing Valley -Wide parks into the city. RMEd4kilAildredrswer the question first that this will provide better facilities and programs to the residents of Menifee and that the city will also be better served by this action. Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 19 City of Menifee Parks Master Plan Update Meeting Date: August 23, 2022 Topic: Meeting Minutes Meeting Topic: Senior Committee Meeting Minutes Attendees: See sign -in sheet attachment Af. MENIFEE C A L I F 0 R N I A ues ion a. Water features b. ADA compliance, how can a whole family enjoy the amenities c. Dog parks are a high desire; however, some don't want any d. More pickleball courts are desired, along with tournament elements e. Teen amenities and items (skatepark is the main thing but something on the east side would be good) f. Soccer fields would be desired (additional space for tournaments) g. Parks should be lighted for evening play for both youth and seniors, lighting in general for security as well h. Need additional parking, dirt fields are not adequate. Having parking close to amenities would be desired i. There's not enough handicap parking at Central Park and other parks j. Parks should be fun and multigenerational and accommodate all ages k. Consider rentable space for the park I. Central Park meditation garden is very nice, and the kids enjoy going there to relax as well, areas to sit and meditate m. There could be community pools and aquatic features n. Multi -use parks, used for different purposes, unless it's used as a sports park o. Many folks drive to Audie Murphy Park as it has various uses p. Nice to have walking paths around the parks, helps to bridge the gap with generations q. Safety should be considered as a value Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 20 ues ion o ree riori lies a. Convenience, safety b. Sports Park, family parks, multi -generational amenities in parks, ADA compliant, c. Parking, accessibility, d. Consider a community amenities (stages, etc.), indoor activities e. Enhancements to the existing parks (more shade, water features, and elements to make it more useful) f. Community centers, gyms, etc. g. Material that gets used is very hot, consider other materials and shade ues ion o i or an are ro ra s a. Arts and crafts, tai chi, other programs to help build skills (wood carving, welding, etc.) b. Would be nice to have a community theater which could facilitate senior and teen programs c. The City has great programs, College also has some other classes, center that can offer those classes in a fun way, there's a lot of people who are retired and can use some facilities, adopt a grandparent d. The City is a great City. They are doing great things. The amenities that we have to offer other cities don't have. Veterans come to the City because it's a good retirement community and they like the school system. e. A wellness park could be a good amenity ues ion a. Would be nice for the City to accommodate multiple sporting events and tournaments (pickleball, baseball, volleyball, etc.). When building new parks that should be considered. b. Because we are growing, we may need one large community center for all of the events. We've outgrown the senior center for some of the events and programs. c. At the end of the courts just having a walking track (access is needed around the fields anyways). d. Little League uses Wheatfield, Lago Visto, and Centennial only. Would be nice to have them all in one space e. Can we bring food trucks to parks and have other events, central community center with other satellite centers f. Some of the community spaces are limited in availability. It would be great to have. g. Senior Center in Chicago had after school programs and other features (more like a community center) ues ion a. City is doing a great job but focus is more on the youth, having classes and senior specific issues would be good (fall prevention, identity theft, etc.) but also consider other things like a night out b. Food nights in the park is a great event (over 1k people). We could have more of these and rotate parks. Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 21 c. People on the other side of the freeway don't like to drive to the other side. So consider having features on both sides. d. Having different events ues ion a. Yes, we need to have all parks under the City. Make their parks up to the value of the City's parks b. Valley -Wide is not maintaining the parks as well as the City. If you want them to do anything then they want you to help them financially. They want funds to make improvements. c. Wheatfield could have a lot more offerings and resources, if the City could take that over would be great. d. Friendliness from the City staff is much better. e. Everything is geared towards the youth on Valley -Wide facilities. The City is much better equipped for this. Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 22 Input on the Sport Organization groups August 29 Donna AYSO representative Jim Wells for Under Armor Under the Lights Flag Football. Question 4: Other Strengths- Jim Wells- Maintenance is not it strength it nor is availability. The strength is that the city is growing. Donna- The park rangers are good and the responsiveness (Nancy allocates) are strengths and always trying to move forward. Q2- Availability of fields is a problem. Don't have regular availability for training and games. They have 1,000 kids playing soccer. They are using Valley -Wide fields and middle -schools. Currently use the multi -fields. They often use 10 scattered fields for games. They use Heritage Lakes but is often closed for reseeding. Not enough goal posts. Q3- Costs are fine. How do the costs compare to Valley -Wide? A little bit cheaper. They do a package deal. City charges per field ($50 per a couple of hours). They will bundle the lights and the practice access. Q4- Field Lighting (only two have them for Soccer of Flag Football). This limits the amount of time to use the fields, especially in the Fall with shorter evenings. What is the age range for the Flag Football. Pre-K to 8th grade is the typical range (Jim). They often use the outfields of softball and baseball that have lighting. Same issue for Donna. Q5- Uneven surfaces do present an injury risk for many players (Donna). Petersen and Lyle Marsh parks have gopher hole problems (Jim). The grass is very uneven at Audy Murphy that has some trip hazards. Hidden Mills has a very good running surface compared to the other parks (Donna). The goals for soccer often do not have wheels that work so they have to be carried. Q6- Will there be the idea of a Sport's complex? (Donna) Some families might need to travel too much and could not watch all of their kids. Q7- Are there some areas in different areas of Menifee that are not close to the residents? Donna uses Quail Valley, but they do travel a bit to get to practice and to have for tournaments. It is best to have practice sessions close by but okay to travel to fields. Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 23 Q8- Close by amenities are good to have at the park. So nearby amenities are important to keep close by to have younger family members kept busy. They need to be close by restrooms. Walkways are good to have nearby to keep them active. Q9- Valley -Wide discussion- Is there a difference to you and your members to have everything under one umbrella? (Donna) Yes, would save them more time if they did not have to go to multiple groups. Valley -Wide has been good and responsive. (Jim). Competition may be good between the two options. Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 24 City Council Chambers 29844 Haun Road Menifee, CA 92586 Bill Zimmerman, Mayor Bob Karwin, District 1 Matthew Liesemeyer, District 2 Lesa Sobek, District 3 Dean Deines, District 4 SPECIAL MEETING (3:00 PM) 1. CALL TO ORDER }~ ENIFE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES Menifee City Council Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, October 05, 2022 3:00 PM Special Meeting Armando G. Villa, City Manager Jeffrey T. Melching, City Attorney Kay Vinson, Acting City Clerk Mayor Zimmerman called the special meeting to order at 3:01 PM. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Dean Deines, Bob Karwin, Matthew Liesemeyer, Lesa Sobek, Bill Zimmerman Absent: None 3. WORKSHOP 3.1 Workshop on the Parks Master Plan Update Community Services Director Jonathan Nicks and Consultant provided a presentation, which was followed by questions from Councilmembers. The following speaker provided public comment: • Marcea Croxton stressed need for volleyball courts, field lighting, and provisions for shade. ACTION 1. Reviewed the presentation provided by City consultant KTU+A and provided feedback for Parks Master Plan Update. Councilmembers discussed amenities, locations, and priorities as follows: Councilmember Karwin: • Trails, suggested Salt Creek bike trail be lengthened to connect for access • Dog park, examine usage and possibly combine dog park/exercise trail at Sun City • Large sports park if space permits, perhaps in new developments Menifee Mayor and City Council October 5, 2022 Page 1 of 2 Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 25 Mayor Zimmerman: • Indoor sports facility • Large, lighted sports park • Splash Pads (separate inclusive play); history and partnership with Drop Zone • Playground with adult workout stations facing inward • Nature interpretative center possibly near Scott Road • Use of 2'/. acre site (Project Lift) near Goetz Road Councilmember Sobek: • Linear multi -purpose trail (perhaps in drainage channel), including sports, disc golf, lights • Amphitheater/performing arts facility • Large indoor recreation center for sports including volleyball, pool, rock wall, meeting rooms • Large outdoor park, perhaps combining like sports to allow tournament play and looking at trends, i.e. pickle ball • Splash pads with shade and water • Utilization of 'Qualify of Life' funds and involvement of Youth Leaders of Menifee Councilmember Liesemeyer: • Potential usage of Canyon Heights • Aquatic partnerships with Drop Zone, Palomar Valley & Heritage Hills high schools, as well as partnerships for performing arts • Regional indoor facility • Kabian Park partnership • Walking trails with inclusion of disc golf • Adventure playground • Additional outreach to youth, schools Mayor Pro Tern Deines: • Indoor community center for sports and arts, sizeable classrooms with partitions for programs • Walking trails • Adventure playground • Pickle ball/tennis interchangeable courts • Amphitheater • Parks unique to each area and infill with needed amenities • Funding sources, continued funding for operations, leveraging partnerships 4. ADJOURN Mayor Zimmerman adjourned the special meeting at 4:45 PM. I Kay Vi son, MC, Acting City Clerk Menifee Mayor and City Council October 5, 2022 Page 2 of 2 Appendix A; Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 26 FINAL COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS How long have you lived in the City of Menifee? Invite Less than 1 year '2% 1- 5 years 6 -10 years -19% it -15 years _ 15% 16 - 20 years _ 12% 21 years or more -18% Avg_ 11.7 n= 277 Area of residence r Areal[---- rea 1 ` .Invite --=.-.1349u Area 2 I ' 126% Area 3 18% Area 4 :— ,122% n= 239 Open Link dkIL .12% 34% 0- 11 13% 06% 14% _ 13% 9.4 77 Event 7% Ove. al I ■ 5% 4296' W 37% 20% —1896 —15% _ 14% =9% _12% _ 10% _ 15% 9.1 10.6 150 SO4 Open Link Event 46% 33% —25% 1990 Now" 254b 1°0 14% 01 122 Do you live in a gated community with restricted public access? (HOA) I vite Li Source, RRC Associates Overall 47% 4096 - 26% — 20% _ 14% 428 Source: RRC Assrn:iates Overall No 78% 73% 76% Yes f 2246 26% _23% Not sure! lq0 1% JL% n= 287 102 389 Source: RRC Associates How aware are you of which agency (City of Menifee, HOA, Valley -Wide Parks and Recreation District) manages the parks you most frequently visit? Inv to Open Link Overall Very aware 19% 25% 120% Somewhat aware 45% 47% ( 146% Not at all aware 36% 28% 34% n= 286 102 388 Source: RRC Associates Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 27 Q 6: Which of the parks orfaciIities do you most typically visit? Percent Responding: Daily Weekly Monthly AI'm times a VP Once year Hwewt u—t in past "at My local HOA Invite 233■10% 015% .10% 16% 3% 46% parks or facilities Open Link 70 17% 016% 011% _31% 4% �30% City of Menifee Invite 268179/. 016% 014% 1 1,1123% 4% �36% parks or facilities Open Link 84 17% =19% 00127% _j29% 2% -1586 Valley -Wide invite 24414% 014% 012% 19% 7% 43% P arks or facilities open fink 82 15%10% 18% j28% ir` ....:.. 6%33% tiource: RRC .:;,ochres Which city parks/recreation facilities have been used by your household in the past 12 months? Invite Wheatfield Park-33% Ope Link 38°% Event Overall Il 42% 37% Audie Murphy Sports Park/Skate Park-29% M38% -33% Spirit Park-28% _�33% 40% =42% -35% Heritage Lake Sports Park -27% _20% 36% -29% Aldergate Park/Dog Park_18% _17% -31% _22°% Centennial Park_17% _21% _19% _18% Kay Ceniceros Senior Center-16% 1100120% -14% -16% Lago Vista Sports Park=14% 011% -14% -14% Lazy Creek Park/Recreation Center -11% _21% 1100121% _16% Discovery Park ■10% 017% ■ 10% 010% My local HOA Parks or Facilities -28°% 019°% Valley -Wide Parks or Facilities -28% ■10% n= 229 81 159 469 soul,-_: RRC 4 uate� Q 8: Which THREE parks/recreation facilities does your household use most frequently? Invite Wheatfield Park =310% Ooen Link _036% Event 14%®38% Overall �69°% Spirit Park 29% 37% =35% =N�65% Audie Murphy Sports Park/Skate Park =2796 15%�44% ®29% �62% Heritage Lake Sports Park =27% Mis°% =29% �510% Aldergate Park/Dog Park018% 1022% 0123% C=41% Kay Ceniceros Senior Center -.16°% 1150% '6% 024°% Centennial Park 015% Ell% 11196 0026% Lago Vista Sports Park '014% 110°% 1129b 025°% Lazy Creek Park/Recreation Center 18% 024°% 1129b 0124% Discovery Park 46% 414% 14% 110% My local HOA Parks or Facilities (see map below) ■26% .18% Valley -Wide Parks or Facilities (see map below) 02606 .18% Other parks or facilities =219b 0115% 0vera!I column cno.vs aUimi�lar.de percenL,ge from all rhrae samp�e�. Source: =Rr Ass oclaI— Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 28 From the list in the previous question, which park do you live closest to? Invite Other (specified previously) -27% Open Link -20% Event Overall 33% Wheatfield Park_14% W9% _14% -26% Heritage Lake Sports Park =11% 'Z7% _IS% -23% AudieMurphy Sports Park/Skate Park -10% M11% _16% -24% Spirit Park.9% 09% 09% _17% Aldergate Park/Dog Park ■8% -24% 14% -18% Lazy Creek Park/Recreation Center ■ 7% ■ 8% ■ 8% _ 15% Lago Vista Sports Park 06% 11% 14% 09% Centennial Park14% 05% 14% .8% Kay Ceniceros Senior Center 12% 14% 13% 06% Discovery Park '2% 13% 14% My local HOA Parks or Facilities _14% -9% Valley -Wide Parks or Facilities .9% 06% n= 211 74 141 426 Source: RRC Associates Which of the city parks/recreation facilities, if any, do you feel needs major improvements and additional amenities to become a better -quality park that can support recreational needs into the future? Invite Wheatfield Park-24% Open Link -29% Event 33% Overall -29% Aldergate Park/Dog Park -23% 34% 31% -28% Lazy Creek Park/Recreation Center =11% ■7% _16% _12% Heritage Lake Sports Park .9% _12% -19% _13% Kay Ceniceros Senior Center .9% r""M422% =11% -12% Audie Murphy Sports Park/Skate Park06% 10% _14% -10% Spirit Park .S% 12% =13% -SO% Lago Vista 5ports Park05% 1 10% 13% 05% Centennial Park,4% 1 12% 07% 07% Discovery Park'2% 1115% .6% 14% Valley -Wide Parks orFaciIities -29% =12% My local HOA Parks or Facilities _16% ■6% n= 93 41 90 224 Average Importance vs. Average Satisfaction Aquatic programs Trails and pathways Adult recreation and sports programs Amenities at City parks (e.g., picnic areas, playgrounds) Community centers Open park spaces Senior programs Youth recreation and sports programs Special events Kids club/camps Athletic courts (e.g., basketball, tennis) ADA-accessible programs Athletic fields (e.g., baseball, soccer) Source: RRC Associates Cat=rgories sorted by ditFerence betwcen average mportan-e and average satisfacuon rating Sour( e: RRC Associates Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 29 Average Importance vs. Average Satisfaction Aquatic programs Trails and pathways Adult recreation and sports programs Amenities at City parks (e.g., picnic areas, playgrounds) Community centers Open park spaces Senior programs Youth recreation and sports programs Special events Kids club/camps Athletic courts (e.g., basketball, tennis) ADA-accessible programs Athletic fields (e.g., baseball, soccer) Carerciories sorted by difference between average imoorrance and average -gong. Source: RRC Associates Q 15: Please rate how important the following facilities and services are to your household. Please provide an answer even if you have not used the facility or service. Trails and pathways Amenities at City parks (e.g., picnic areas, playgrounds) Open park spaces Special events Senior programs Adult recreation and sports programs Athletic courts (e.g., basketball, tennis) Youth recreation and sports programs Community centers Athletic fields (e.g., baseball, soccer) Aquatic programs ADA-accessible programs Kids club/camps n=254 rL&: n=141 n=476 n=247 - n=79 n=140 n=466 n=243 n=79 rt=333 n-455 n=238 n= 76 n=133 n=449 r IIn=238 n=77 naL37 n=-052 n=236 ry 78 n=131 n=445 n=245 n='38 n=458 n=233 n=333 n=441 n=240 n=135 n=454 n=242 n=133 MoUn=451 n=231 n='" n=133 n=441 I3.3 ®3.4 ®3.4 ®3.3 3.1 3.5 3.8 ® 3.4 'Ratings categories are sorted in descending order by the average rating of the invite sample. Source: RRC Associates Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 30 Q 15: Please rate how you think the facilities and services are currently meeting the needs of the community. Please provide an answer even if you have not used the facility or service. Invite Open Link Event Overall Amenities at City parks (e.g., picnic areas, 3.9 3.9 3.7 3.8 playgrounds) Open park spaces 3.8 3.6 3.8 3.8 Athletic courts (e.g., basketball, tennis) 3.7 ®3&S ®3.4 3.6 Athletic fields (e.g., baseball, soccer) 3.7 ®3.4 3.7 3.7 Special events 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.7 Youth recreation and sports programs 3.5 ®2.9 3.6 ®3.4 Trails and pathways ®3.4 ®3.2 ®3.4 ®3.4 Community centers ®3.4 ®3.1 ®3.3 ®3.3 Senior programs ®3.3 ®3.1 ®3.2 ®3.3 ADA-accessible programs ®3.3 ®3.3 ®3.3 ®3.3 Adult recreation and sports programs ®3.2 2.9 3.1 3.1 Kidsclub/camps ®3.2 2.9 ®3.3 ®3.2 Aquatic programs ®2.7 ®2.1 ®2.2 ®2.4 `Ratings categories are sorted in descending order by the average rating of the invite sample. Source: RRC Associates From the list below, indicate which factors have hindered your use of Menifee parks and recreation facilities, services, and programs in the past? I r.viie Not aware of the services offered -36% Ooen Link Event 38% _ 20% N/A - Have not been hindered -32% 24% ® 29% Don't have the programs Iwant _19% W 26% -24% No time or other personal reasons _ 17% W ;15% . SO% Location of programs/classes not convenient -13% 09% -14% Safety and security -12% 09% -13% Overall condition/maintenance of Iocations.11% M.21% _21% Haursofoperation/timeoffered -11% -15% -12% Lack of quality instruction or programming .6% 07% ■9% Prefer other recreation providers/clubs, 5% ' 2% ■ 10% Price or user fees 16% ■ 9% 14% n= 258 82 136 Overall -32% -30% _ 22% -15% -13% -12% -15% 012% 07% 06% 16% 476 Soui ce: RRC Associates Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 31 Which THREE of the following non-traditional recreational facilities and/or activities do you feel should be seriously considered by the City of Menifee over the next 5 years? (SELECT UP TO THREE) Invite Ooen Link Overall Walking trails/interpretive trails 54% �W5% 52% Splash pads/spray grounds 37% �38% 37% Community gardens 360�o Dog parks - 30% Adventure playground -22% Pickleball courts _20% Other facility/amenity _ 17% Outdoor fitness equipment _ 17% Obstacle or agility course =14% Disc golf course -13% Bike pump track/skills course M 11% Skateboard park/plaza 08% Rope, wall, or bouldering 06% n= 250 34% 36% 33% -31% 24% - 23% 18% M 20% 25% _ 19% 13% -16% 11% -13% 14% -13% 9% 011% 3% 0 7% 5% 16% 80 330 Source• RR(7 Assoaare; Q 21: What are the most important needs to be addressed by the City of Menifee over the next 5 to 10 years? Prrrrnt P, r•ponding: ■ b-Very rnp❑rl.-I Rating Category Sample Avg. n= 1& 2 3 4& 5 a Add more trails and walking areas n or Invite 4.0 238� 12% 14°h 1]y' 4% s outside of parks Oprn I ink 4.3 70 16% 13% 2 ®81% c1 -Not ar all impe tart Add more linear parks that include Invite 3.9 233E 14% 18% 68% natural areas with paths Open Link 4 1 71 16% 24% �70% Add more natura resource parks and Invite 3.9 22915% 16% �69% open space Open Link 3.9 67 13% 19% M i 67% Expand current park amenities and Invite 3-7 2301 17% '22% ®60% activ ties Open Link 4.0 68 1 10% 16% ©740/. Add more traditional neighborhood or Invite 3.4 2261F 22% `28% M50% community parks Open Link 3.5 65 1 23% 23% 1054% Invite 3.1 226EM '36% 20% EM43% Add more m ni parks (1/2 to 2 acres) Open l ink 1.9 /1 ® 41% 25% 1M340% 'Rat inys catpgones drp sorted in descending ❑rdor by Lhe avpragp roLuiy Yau r'kkL: �..•: L9L04. Appendix A; Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 32 Q 22: Parks, recreation, and open space opportunities are offered in Menifee for a variety of purposes and to serve the needs of a diverse population. Please rate how important each of the following purposes in Menifee is to you and your household. Invite Open Link Event Overall Provide a high level of safety and security at facilities Ensure parks and recreation opportunities are accessible to all residents Ensure facilities and programs are affordable to all residents of Menifee - Encourage active lifestyles and promote 4.5 health, wellness, and fitness Ensure environmental sustainability in park 4.2 4.4 4.3 design and maintenance practices Strengthen community image and sense of 4.2 4.3 4.2 place Focus on providing family -oriented activities 4.1 4.3 4.2 Create economic benefit through enhanced 4.0 i• . 4.2 3.9 4.0 property values Offer cultural events, festivals, and activities 3.7 4.1 4.1 3.9 to reflect diversity and inclusivity `Ratings categories are sorted in descending order by the average rating of the invite sample. Source RRC Associates Overall 42 4.1 Open park spaces • 40 Special events a C m c 3 8 Average Importance Rating m :. _ = Athletic courts (e:g., basketball; tennis) n •Conimunitycenters • E 3.6 • Aquatic programs Adult recreation and sports programs • Athletic fields (e.g., baseball, soccer) *Senior programs 3.5 3.4 3.3 ;AVPYane Needs Met Ratinn 24 2.5 26 27 30 3.1 32 3.3 3 4 3.5 It 3-7 3.8 Meets Needs Rating Source:RRC Associates Appendix A: Community Priorities and Needs Assessment 33 Infill Opportunities per Park POTENTIAL INFILL OPPORTUNITIES PER PARK What is an Infill Opportunity Analysis? The purpose of this section is to identify underutilized spaces at existing city parks to develop new amenities like multi -purpose fields, courts, playgrounds, etc. Adding amenities at parks in underutilized spaces may help increase park usage and decrease some of the amenity and other level of service deficits that currently exist at city parks. The purpose of this appendix item is to show simply what amenities will fit in the opportunity areas base on their typical square footage and dimensions. The Infill Amenity Opportunity Areas Section in Chapter 6 of the Plan makes specific recommendations for amenities to infill at several existing city parks based on this analysis. Followed by an amenity level of service scenario if the new recommended infill amenities were im- plemented into the future park system. Appendix B: Infill Opportunities Per Park Central Park Area 1: 26,226 square feet Located on the northeast of the park between the existing playground area, picnic area, and the Paloma Wash Trail / multi -use path that connects Newport Road to the north and Holland Road at the south end. Area 2:1,937 square feet Located near the center of the park between the central formal planted area and the expansive out- door amphitheater that is at the southeast corner of the park. Area 3*: 3,333 square feet Located at the existing water feature. Only suitable for water feature. OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 I ✓ ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 ✓ Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 4,000-75,000 ✓ ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field ✓ Skate Park 4,000-10,000 ✓ Swimming Pool 1,000-10,000 Splash pad/Sprayground 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 ✓ ✓ Appendix B: Infill Opportunities Per Park Creek View Park Area 1: 7,911 square feet Located on the west end of the park, and adjacent to the community center ranch house with swim- ming pools, playground area, and picnic area. OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 ✓ Skate Park 4,000-10,000 ✓ Swimming Pool 1,000-10,000 Splash pad/Sprayground 500-1,500 ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ Outdoor Exercise Areas 500-2,000 ✓ Appendix B; Infill Opportunities Per Park E.L. Pete Petersen Park Area 1: 63,860 square feet Located on most of the north/center portion of the park's open grass area situated between the dog park area, basketball court, and playground equip- ment at the south edge of the park next to the park- ing and restrooms. Area 2: 2,452 square feet Located on the northeast corner of the park be- tween the dog park area and the park's large cen- tral open grass area. Area 3: 3,510 square feet Located at the north edge of the basketball court on the middle east edge of the park. Area 4: 3,466 square feet Located at the south edge of the basketball court on the middle east edge of the park. t ,Pete Pete sen Park OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Dog Park 10,000-75,000 Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 Skate Park 4,000-10,000 Swimming Pool 11000-10,000 Splashpad/Sprayground 500-1,500 ✓ I ✓ ✓ ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ Appendix B: Infill Opportunities Per Park 4 Hidden Hills Park Area 1: 1,783 square feet Located on the northeast corner of the park, and adjacent to the existing playground area, picnic area, and the parking lot. Area 2: 2,266 square feet Located on the west end of the park on a small open grass area with access to adjacent housing. Area 3: 5,903 square feet Located near area 2 in open grass of the park, and adjacent to shaded park benches and flowering planter beds. Area 4: 1,243 square feet Located near the center of the park adjacent to the paved walking path and basketball court. Ubnen C1 Hidden Hills Park 00, s.., 06001-11* OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 ✓ Skate Park 4,000-10,000 ✓ Swimming Pool 1,000-10,000 Splashpad/Sprayground 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Appendix B; Infill Opportunities Per Park 5 John V. Denver Park Area 1: 11,533 square feet Located near the center of the park between an ex- isting playground area, picnic area, basketball court and sand volleyball court. OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 ✓ Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 ✓ Skate Park 4,000-10,000 ✓ Swimming Pool 11000-10,000 Splashpad/Sprayground 500-1,500 Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 ✓ Appendix B: Infill Opportunities Per Park La Ladera Park Area 1; 10,047 square feet Located in an open grass area at the north edge of the park north of an existing gazebo. Area 2; 9,229 Located north, adjacent to the existing pickleball courts. OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 ✓ Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 I ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 Skate Park 4,000-10,000 ✓ Swimming Pool 1,000-10,000 Splash pad/Sprayground 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 ✓ ✓ Appendix B: Infill Opportunities Per Park Lary Creek Park & Recreation Center Area 1; 2,163 square feet Located on the northwest corner of the park be- tween the existing sidewalk on the street and the larger open grass area at the center of the park. Area 2; 9,852 square feet Located on the northern open grass area for the park between the recreation building and the road at the north edge of the park. OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 ✓ Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 ✓ Skate Park 4,000-10,000 ✓ Swimming Pool 1,000-10,000 Splash pad/Sprayground 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 ✓ ✓ Appendix B: Infill Opportunities Per Park Lyle Marsh Park Area 1: 5,847 square feet Located at the northwest edge of the central large open grass area directly adjacent the central open grass area and a shrub planter on the north side. Area 2: 2,889 square feet Located on the east edge of the park in an open grass area between the playground equipment and adjacent road. Area 3: 3,803 square feet Located at the southern end of the park in an open grass area near the intersection of the perimeter roads and sidewalk. -oi OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 ✓ ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 Skate Park 4,000-10,000 ✓ ✓ Swimming Pool 11000-10,000 Splashpad/Sprayground 500-1,500 ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ 1 Appendix B: Infill Opportunities Per Park 9 Mayfield Park Area 1: 6,558 square feet Located on the west end of the park in an open grass area between the road at the parks edge and an open stormwater detention pond to the north. Area 2: 7,534 square feet Located near the center of the park on a large open grass area and picnic shelter in one corner. Area 3: 22,508 square feet Located on the largest open grass area at the southeast corner of the park below the existing playground equipment and at the intersection of the perimeter road and sidewalk. Area 4: 7,868 square feet Located along the east edge of the park adjacent to the perimeter road on the east side and detention pond to the west. OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 ✓ ✓ ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ Picnic Areas 500-11500 ✓ ✓ ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 ✓ ✓ Skate Park 4,000-10,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Swimming Pool 11000-10,000 Splashpad/Sprayground 500-11500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 ✓ ✓ Appendix B: Infill Opportunities Per Park 10 Nova Park Area 1:10,007 square feet Located on the northeast corner of the park's large open grass central area and playground equipment on the south edge. Area 2: 5,556 square feet Located on the southeast corner of the park's large open grass central area and playground equipment on the north edge. Area 3: 1,438 square feet Located on the northwest corner of the park's large open grass central area with a shrub planer and landscape drainage swale farther west. Area 4: 897 square feet Located on the southwest corner of the park's large open grass central area with a shrub planer and landscape drainage swale farther west. OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 ✓ ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 Skate Park 4,000-10,000 ✓ ✓ Swimming Pool 11000-10,000 Splash pad/Sprayground 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Appendix B: Infill Opportunities Per Park 11 Silver Star Park Area 1:11,460 square feet Located near the center of the park with a large open grass playing field to the south, basketball court and playgrounds to the north and paved walking path to the east. Area 2: 9,875 square feet Located on the northwest corner of the park be- tween the basketball court, stormwater detention pond and housing to the north. Area 3: 1,075 square feet Located on the northeast corner of the park, and adjacent to the existing playground area, picnic area, and a City maintenance building. Area 4: 5,745 square feet Located on the northern central edge of the park in an open grass field with playground on the south edge and shrub planter on the north edge. it t T 1 •• 1 OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 ✓ ✓ Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 ✓ Skate Park 4,000-10,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ Swimming Pool 11000-10,000 Splash pad/Sprayground 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 I ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Appendix B: Infill Opportunities Per Park 12 Spirit Park Area 1: 15,013 square feet Located on the west/center of the park, and adja- cent to the existing playground area, picnic area, and a City Parks and Rec Building. Area 2: 2,883 square feet Located near the center of the park running paral- lel to a lineal path/parkway that parallels Newport Road. Area 3: 6,504 square feet Located near the east end of the park in an open grass area along the linear path/parkway in the park. Area 4: 1,833 square feet Located at the east end of the park in an open grass area next to the east pedestrian entry gate. OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 ✓ ✓ Basketball Court (92'x5o') 4,700 ✓ ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 ✓ Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 ✓ ✓ Skate Park 4,000-10,000 I ✓ ✓ Swimming Pool 11000-10,000 Splash pad/Sprayground 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 ✓ ✓ Appendix B; Infill Opportunities Per Park 13 Sunset Park Area 1; 6,942 square feet Located on the northwest corner of the park, and adjacent to the existing playground area, picnic area, and walking paths around the grass area. Area 2; 871 square feet Located on the east edge of the park between the existing playground / picnic area and the perimeter road along the edge of the park. 10 OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 ✓ Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 ✓ Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 ✓ Skate Park 4,000-10,000 ✓ Swimming Pool 1,000-10,000 Splash pad/Sprayground 500-1,500 ✓ ✓ Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 ✓ ✓ Appendix B: Infill Opportunities Per Park 14 Talavera Park Area 1: 3,019 square feet Located at the northwest edge of the park on an open grass between paved walking paths and ad- jacent to the existing playground and picnic area. w _ - OUTDOOR Amphitheater 4,000-55,000 Basketball Court (92'x50') 4,700 Community Garden 2,000-40,000 ✓ Diamond Field 40,000-80,000 Dog Park 10,000-75,000 Multi -Purpose Field 40,000-80,000 Pickleball 2,500-3,500 ✓ Picnic Areas 500-1,500 ✓ Playgrounds (ages 2-5 & ages 6-12) 4,000-6,000 ✓ Rectangular Soccer Field 4,000-75,000 Skate Park 4,000-10,000 Swimming Pool 11000-10,000 Splash pad/Sprayground 500-1,500 Tennis (60'x120') 7,200-28,000 ✓ Volleyball (70'x40') 4,000-16,000 ✓ Outdoor Exercise Area 500-2,000 Appendix B; Infill Opportunities Per Park 15 Recommendations Matrix RECOMMENDATIONS MATRIX OVERVIEW This recommendations matrix is meant to serve as a detailed chart to the Chapter 6 Recommendations. It gives each action item a capital cost estimate, capital funding sources, operational budget impact, operation- al funding sources, and a timeframe to complete. Matrix Keys Capital Funding Sources Key b = DIF/Quimby c = CFDs/CSDs d = Taxes/General fund e = Grants f = Donations Operational Funding Sources a = User fees c = CFDs/CSDs d = Taxes/General Fund e = Grants f = Donations Timeframe to Complete Immediate = < 1 year Short = 1-5 years Mid = 5-10 years Long = 10+ years Appendix C; Recommendations Matrix MASTERMENIFEE PARKS . TIMEFRAME CAPITAL CAPITAL OPERATION- COST FUNDING AL BUDGET FUNDING TO OBJECTIVE ACTIONS• • 1.1 Consider improvements/ infill of City owned parks a. Explore ways to add facilities at existing City owned properties, focused on improving Level of Service and mitigating Park needs in park -poor areas. Varies per facility c,d,e,f Staff time N/A Mid Staff time N/A Short b. Reference infill opportunity maps for N/A N/A where these opportunity areas exist. c. Explore the possibility of divesting from N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short properties that may have limited use in the :future, d. Create a phased plan for infill in $100- c,d,e,f Staff time N/A Short established parks and create Concept Plans $500K for each infill area. e. Implement infill projects. $10M- c,d,e $10K- d,e,f Varies $15M $400K 1.2 Include aquatic facilities (i.e., a. Find areas within existing parks for splash pads or spray features, $100K- $400K b,c,d,e Staff time b,c,d,e Short Staff time d Immedi- splash/spray b, Implement agreements with facilities N/A N/A pads) such as the Drop Zone in Perris and ate increase public awareness in Menifee y W_ publications. $5K- a, d Short c. Consider joint use agreements with $250K- d,e W UJ schools and other private facilities to help increase aquatic facilities and distribution. $750K $10K G Z a to 1.3 Address W deferred maintenance V throughout the 4 City d. Consider a city owned facility that has aquatic features without duplicating facilities at the nearby Drop Zone. a. Perform facility condition assessment to determine necessary maintenance to bring facilities into good condition or to I determine capital investment needs. b. Create and implement a park maintenance schedule based on an N/A $500K- $800K TBD b,d,e b,c,d TBD $10K- $23.7K b, d Long TBD b,d Mid Staff time TBD Short asset management system for regularly scheduled maintenance and/or replacement of park amenities. c, Evaluate the list annually to create TBD N/A Staff time Varies Short priorities to be addressed and incorporate into the capital improvement plan. �d. Consider CAPRA Accreditation to TBD TBD Staff time TBD Short continue to build a comprehensive management system and operational best practices. e. Consider outsourcing service repairs as $50K- d TBD d Mid needed to meet the demand for deferred $200K maintenance. f. Maximize energy efficiency and TBD TBD Staff time TBD Mid sustainability (ex, recycling bins) in the design and construction of new parks, amenities, and major renovations. Explore the use of green energy such as solar panels in parking lots and buildings. Appendix C: Recommendations Matrix 1.4 Improve the a. Reference the infill opportunity maps in current level Appendix C and Infill Recommendations of service Table 6-2 for areas to address with level of throughout the service gaps within the City, City b. Look at the top five priority LOS amenities and implement. c. Refine the planning process to assure developer built parks are where they are needed and include the amenities that are likely needed including local park amenity shortages. d. Look at shifting developer impact fees into community parks that resolve local deficiencies and improves equitable distribution of parks. 1.5 Explore adding a. Find underutilized areas within the key indoor facilities growth areas of the City for additional at existing or indoor facilities, that can address indoor new recreation/ recreational programs especially for teens � community, and seniors. N/A N/A ' See I d,e Short Operational Budget Impact $1M- d TBD d,e Mid $2.5M TBD TBD Staff time I TBD Short TBD I TBD I Staff time I TBD I Mid $25k I d I Staff time I N/A I Short LU teen, and senior b, Consider joint use facilities to provide TBD N/A Staff Time N/A Short centers more teen and senior indoor uses. W c. Explore adding a recreation facility in the $2.5M- b,c,d,e TBD b,c,d,e Mid city See infill map. $7.5M Q $200- d,e,f Staff time a,d,e,f Short p d, Develop guidelines that can help flag Z opportunities for park amenities and trails 300K Q for areas not considered parks, but that are W public ROW or unimproved public spaces. ~ � ark date e, Review and u design P P 9 TBD TBD Staff time TBD Short U standards to include best practices for Q playground safety including appropriate LL. levels of shade covering. I 1.6 Develop flexible c. Explore other areas for multi -purpose $7K-$9K 50K- b,c,d,e a,d,e,f Mid use fields fields. $1.5M + $3K per acre for turf care 1.7 Provide multi- a, Identify existing courts that can be $15K N/A Staff time N/A Short purpose converted to multi -purpose courts and courts and emphasis on Pickleball. combine court b. Prioritize multi -purpose courts in areas $250K- c,d,e $1.31K a,d,e,f Mid standards to where LOS is lacking. $900K I accommodate $1.31K a,d,e,f Mid trends that c. Explore areas to add multi -purpose $250K- b,c,d,e support more courts including line striping for sports that $900K variety in court are growing in demand. sport amenities. 1.8 Explore a. Explore the development of regional open TBD TBD TBD TBD Long Partnerships space park with educational nature center to Develop and hiking trails. Regional Parks b. Explore the development of regional TBD TBD TBD TBD Long sports park with diamond fields and multi- purpose fields. I C: Recommendations Matrix Appendix 3 2.1 I Expand a. Consider offering more youth and teen programs and programs. services — b, Expand sports programs to include soccer, baseball, and girls' softball. Continue to monitor sports program trends and interest. c. Develop a recreation program plan that includes a service matrix, activity development and selection process, and other requirements found in CAPRA standards. d, Continue to offer and expand program opportunities for aquatics, indoor fitness, pickleball, and cultural arts. e. Promote active lifestyles by enhancing and increasing aquatic exercise and fitness programs, 2.2 Explore a. Explore classes that use the outdoor more diverse fitness and exercise equipment in programs programmable spaces. N/A N/A $50K- a, d Short $100K N/A N/A $100K- I a, d Mid $150K N/A I N/A I Staff time I a, d I Short N/A N/A TBD a, d Short N/A N/A $100K- a, d Short $150K $300K- b, d, a $750- a, d $500 K $1 K to maintain equip- ment, (per piece) vandalism abate- i ment b. Use contracted instructors to offer N/A enhanced fitness programming in parks across the City c. Explore cultural arts programs. TBD d. Include young adults programs. TBD e. Increase and enhance programs for N/A individuals with disabilities, Consider programmatic ADA inclusion requirements. 2.3 Enhance a. Offer special events in different areas N/A special event throughout the City that contribute to a programming sense of community and help make each park the hub of each neighborhood. b. Work with existing community groups for N/A each neighborhood to assist with planning special events in parks. c. Invest in a formal sponsorship program N/A for events and activities. At a minimum, develop a policy and tools to assist staff with recruiting program sponsors. d. Enhance and offer special cultural events N/A programs. e. Explore creating a signature community TBD event that could help develop the City's unique identity as proposed in the City Council Strategic Visioning Plan. N/A Staff time, a $20K Short Short N/A TBD N/A I TBD N/A TBD N/A TBD N/A $75K- $100K a, d, Short / e, f Mid N/A $40K- $50K a, d Short N/A I Staff time I N/A I Short N/A Staff time e,f Mid N/A $10K- a,d Mid $15K TBD TBD I TBD I TBD Appendix C: Recommendations Matrix 4 2.4 Continue to a. Invest in and develop an automated and $50K- work with real-time sports field reservation system. $100K other service b. Develop a joint use agreement with the N/A providers school district and ensure the partnership is to develop equitable, programs and services to c. Coordinate with local and City sports N/A group recreation providers. meet demand and trends 2.5 Enhance a, Enhance the park ranger program N/A educational that highlights nature interpretation and nature/ opportunities (i.e., camp fire programs, environmental nature walks, etc.). N/A programs b. Develop partnerships with environmental advocacy groups to offer environmental education programs and camps. c. Establish educational opportunities in $100K- convenient locations to promote gardening $500K and local food production (consider ties with 4-H Youth Development Program). I 2.6 d. Collaborate with schools and educators to create outdoor "classroom" space in parks near schools. Continue a. Consider scholarship opportunities for to monitor students. affordability of programs and , b. Evaluate non-resident program services participation to ensure non-resident participants are paying appropriate and equitable fees. c. Develop a resource allocation and cost recovery policy to ensure equitable use of City resources for Recreation. 2.7 Expand indoor I a. Offer additional enrichment classes programs for seniors, using contract or volunteer and increase instructors to maintain affordability. When opportunities a facility is multi -generational, various age for seniors, groups can interact and help each other young adults, (i.e. book reading by seniors for children or technology help from teens for seniors.) and teens at community b. Increase and Improve Senior Center centers activities focusing on social services, social activities, transportation and information and referral for healthcare and other services. $50K -$100K N/A N/A $10K- $25K N/A d $1.5K I a,d I Short N/A Staff time, N/A Short negotiated I costs N/A Staff time N/A 'I Short N/A I$10K- I a,d Short $25K N/A $10K- d Short $30K d,e $4.8K d Mid (1/2 acre garden) d,e I $4.8K d Mid N/A Staff time, d,f I emm di dedicated ate scholarship fund N/A Staff time I N/A Short N/A Staff time ' d I Mid N/A $10K- a,d Short $25K N/A I N/A I $25K I a,d I Short c. Enhance and improve enrichment N/A N/A $20K- a,d Short programs that offer skills opportunities $50K related to job skills, personal improvement, and academic success. d. Evaluate parking opportunities at the $2K-$5K N/A Staff time N/A Mid Senior Center to ensure appropriate spaces are reserved and available during program and event times. Appendix Q Recommendations Matrix 5 2.8 Continue to a. Develop a consistent and equitable N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short evaluate the manner of community member quality and mix engagement to determine recreation of programs desires and needs, Short and services b. Ensure engagement processes include N/A N/A Staff time N/A residents who live in the southern portion of the City. c. Conduct an annual on-line survey to $20K N/A Staff time d Mid establish trends in participant satisfaction. d. Expand patron evaluation process, N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short emphasizing aquatics, adult sports and youth sports to include post program surveys and comment cards. e, Establish customer service response N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short goals to ensure patrons receive timely responses to complaints or suggestions. 2.9 Communicate a. Develop a marketing plan that includes $75K- d Staff time N/A Short . recreation outreach, pricing, promotion, program mix $100K opportunities to i and social media. • City residents - b. Develop a social media plan that aligns N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short with current trends and update continually, I c. Enhance communication with the Youth N/A N/A Staff time, d Short Leaders of Menifee. $1K d. Improve existing use of the City's web N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short page to assist residents to remain up to date on recreation program opportunities, e. Continue to use and enhance an equity N/A N/A $10K- d Short lens when marketing programs, with $20K specific emphasis on program promotion in cultural events. 3.1 Expand a. Continue to explore unifying Valley -Wide $500K- N/A Staff time N/A Mid potential park Parks into City-wide Park System. $5M amenities Owned and operated by the b, Evaluate land for potential purchase and N/A re -purposing as parkland. N/A Staff time N/A Long City N/A Staff time N/A Mid 3.2 Improve a. Develop a joint use agreement plan with N/A partnerships and joint use one or more of the school districts within Menifee. b. Look at strategic partnerships with N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short agreements organizations such as non -profits. c. Generate partnerships with organizations N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short that can help with park maintenance and cleanup, Appendix C: Recommendations Matrix 6 3.3 Staff a. Address the need for additional N/A N/A Staff time N/A Mid appropriately maintenance staff and resources at to meet current additional parks or upgraded facilities, demand and b. Research additional staffing resources maintain and alternatives to the current staffing N/A N/A Staff time N/A Mid established methods. quality service N/A N/A $100K- a,c,d Short c. Create new maintenance positions within the Community Services Department. $150K per FTE d, Encourage staff certification as a TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Certified Park and Recreational Professional (CRPR) or Certified Park and Recreational Executive (CPRE) through the NRPA. 3.4 Explore a. Develop relationships with local N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short additional businesses, clubs, and organizations to partnerships seek funding, volunteers, and marketing to assist support to expand programs and facilities. with funding, b. Find volunteers to help operate and run N/A volunteering, programs. and marketing N/A Staff time N/A Short N/A Staff time N/A Mid c. Review current contacts with partners N/A and seek out new public/private partnerships to enhance amenities. d. Identify partnerships with other N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short organizations that can provide additional programming space. 3.5 Evaluate and a. Align staffing levels with future park, N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short address staffing facility, and programming enhancements. levels b, Identify current performance standards, N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short 3.6 Improve internal a. Utilize a number of marketing tools and N/A N/A Staff time N/A Mid and external strategies to actively promote parks and communication recreation services, about division b. Increase social media presence, school activities, flyers, and hire intern to assist with social events and media marketing and promotions. N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short services c. Engage all segments of the community in N/A N/A Staff time N/A Mid the marketing efforts. 3.7 Explore making a. Review fees annually to ensure they N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short the facility and are equitable and the collection of fees is park rental fee resulting in appropriate cost recovery, easier Appendix C: Recommendations Matrix 7 4.1 Continue the a. Implement an asset management system $100K d Staff time N/A Short implementation to manage and track equipment and of an asset inventory to improve budget planning. management F b. Create and update a data -driven plan for $100K d Staff time N/A Short system identifying, evaluating, and managing park assets. i c. Annually, inventory parks assets and N/A N/A $50K- N/A Short amenities on an annual basis. Establish $150K photo -inventory and GIS mapping. The inventory must include cost, installation year and a lifecycle for each asset and amenity. d. Complete an annual risk assessment N/A N/A $25K- N/A Short to determine the cost of maintenance $50K and operations, replacement, and consequences if each asset fails. Determine maintenance and operations cost at each year of the asset's lifecycle (based on the level of service for each amenity), e. Annually, incorporate data from the asset N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short management plan and process into capital and operating budgets. I Appendix C: Recommendations Matrix 8 4.2 Explore a. Consider potential mechanisms to additional support and pay for operations and funding options maintenance of parks and facilities. b, Consider the potential support for bond referendum to fund multiple/capital projects. c. Consider internal budget and opportunities to ask/seek additional funding to support improvements in the maintenance and care of City parks and facilities to improve the standard throughout the community. d. Evaluate the non-resident fee structure and consider adjusting fees to ensure non-residents are paying the entire cost of programs, rentals, and activities they participate in. e. Review contracts with partners and seek out new public/private partnerships as a means to enhance the variety of recreational programs available to the community. f. Explore opportunities to increase Cost Recovery at City facilities. Evaluate current fee structure, ongoing expenses, and options for new revenue streams. g. Continue to seek alternative funding source that includes donations, grants, and others forms of sponsorship. h. Communication with current sponsors and donors should be conducted on a regular basis to ensure their continued positive relationships with the City. N/A I N/A I Staff time I N/A I Mid N/A I N/A I Staff time I N/A I Mid N/A I N/A I Staff time I N/A I Short N/A I N/A I Staff time I N/A I Short N/A N/A Staff time N/A Mid N/A N/A (funds N/A Short currently allocated to consultant) N/A N/A Staff time N/A I Short N/A I N/A I Staff time I N/A I Short i. The Department should use the results of N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short the alternative funding exercise completed during the master planning process as a guide for exploring new funding opportunities. j. Seek increased General Fund allocations I N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short / to address recommendations from the Mid Master Plan. Appendix C: Recommendations Matrix 9 11 J 4.3, Explore a, Build on existing sponsorships as well as N/A N/A Staff time N/A opportunities pursue local entities to support events and to increase a scholarship fund, sponsorships b. Ensure all existing and future N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short sponsorships are accurately portrayed in a signed sponsorship agreement, c. Increase community awareness of the N/A N/A $15K-$30K d Short existing Adopt -A -Park program, part-time outreach employee N/A N/A Staff time N/A Mid d. Establish media sponsors and multi -year agreements as priority. 4.4 Track grants a. Consider contracting with a dedicated $75K N/A Staff time d Short and charitable grant writer to research, submit, and track opportunities federal, regional, state, and local grants. N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short b, Consider utilizing professional grant writing resources to pursue grant opportunities, c, Continue tracking NRPA, CRNA, N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short OGALS, LWCF, CRPS, American Trails, and Education in Arts web page's for grant resources. d, Utilize NRPA's Foundation Center for N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short links to thousands of grant opportunities, grant education and training. 5.1 Follow recom- a, Implement Tier One and Tier Two $100K- b,c,d,e $2,3Kfor c,d,e Mid mendations in projects from the ATP for connections to $250K hard sur- the ATP community and neighborhood parks. face, $4.9K for soft sur- face trails per mile (assumes hard surface replace- ments are capital costs) b, Implement Safe Routes to School $1M- b,c,d,e $2.3Kfor c,d,e Mid recommendations to provide access to $51VI hard sur- neighborhood and mini parks near schools. face, $4.9K for soft sur- face trails per mile (assumes hard surface replace- ments are capital costs) TBD N/A TBD N/A Mid c. Coordinate grant pursuits aimed at Safe Routes to Schools that will benefit access to nearby parks. Appendix C; Recommendations Matrix 10 5.2' Enhance a. Identify corridors or areas where linear $500K- connections parks, additional traffic calming, and bicycle $1.5M and entries into and pedestrian improvements are needed. parks b, Close sidewalk and curb ramp gaps $500K- within a quarter mile of parks. $2M c. Incorporate park access TBD recommendations into the City's Complete Streets Plan Update. d. Explore off-street trails and other non- TBD motorized connections between parks and open spaces. e, Coordinate with developers to integrate N/A trails in future projects, especially if adjacent or near parks, open space, or an existing trail. I f. Develop an established trail system TBD in open spaces for educational and recreational use. 5.3 Develop linear a, Through the Complete Streets Plan $1M- parks Update process, identify corridors or areas $3M where linear parks may occur and can be implemented. b. Reclaim underutilized streets and/or infrastructure within the City, $100K 5.4 Connect to a. Complete a feasibility study and $1M- urban trails implement the Salt Creek Trail east $2M outside of the of Antelope Road to the City limits in City coordination with Riverside County This trail is identified as a regional connector by WRCOG, b. Coordinate the connection to the Salt $100K Creek Trail west of Goetz Road with the City of Canyon Lake. This trail is identified as a regional connector by WRCOG. N/A TBD N/A Short N/A TBD N/A Mid N/A I TBD N/A 1 Short TBD I TBD I TBD I Mid N/A I Staff time I N/A I Short TBD I TBD I TBD I Mid b,c,d,e $2.3K-$3.5K c,d,e per mile (assumes hard surface replace- ments are capital costs) d,e Staff time N/A d,e $2.3Kfor d,e hard surface, I $4.9K for soft surface trails i per mile (as- sumes hard surface re- placements are capital costs) d,e Staff time N/A c. Implement bike lane projects that $150K- b,c,d,e Staff time N/A connect outside of the City. $200K d. Expand Paloma Wash Trail to connect to TBD TBD TBD TBD the Salt Creek Trail. Mid Mid Mid Mid Mid Long Appendix C: Recommendations Matrix 11 5.5 Provide I a. Encourage developers to provide walking complete and biking infrastructure. streets that b. Provide more protected bike lanes and include bike facilities as recommended by the ATR walkable and bike friendly networks throughout the City especially those that lead c. Provide more walking trails and close to parks sidewalk gaps. N/A I N/A I Staff time N/A Short / Mid 2M-5M b,c,d,e $2.3Kfor d,e Mid / hard surface, Long $4.9Kfor soft surface trails per mile (as- sumes hard surface re- placements are capital costs $1M- b,c,d,e $2.3Kfor d,e Mid $5M hard surface, $4.9K for soft surface trails per mile (as- sumes hard surface re- placements are capital costs) d. Implement traffic calming elements on see N/A TBD based d,e Short streets that connect to parks and schools. above on street im- provements e. Implement enhanced crossing $150K d Staff time N/A Short opportunities near parks such as curb extensions or rectangular rapid flashing beacons. f. Encourage smart growth in areas that N/A N/A Consultant d,e Long have adequate parks. If inadequate parks, time encourage parks to be built by the smart growth. g. Review opportunities to acquire land to N/A N/A N/A N/A TBD develop nature based or natural open space arks. N/A N/A N/A N/A TBD FhConserve open space through continued stewardship such as increasing interpretive and educational programming. Appendix C: Recommendations Matrix 12 5.6 Develop a I a. Identify potential trail systems that would N/A N/A N/A N/A Mid comprehensive benefit the public and help to preserve the trail network natural open space of canyons, hillsides, mountains, creeks, and unique geologic areas regardless of current ownership. b. Prioritize and combine the trails system N/A N/A N/A N/A Mid to be in close proximity to parks, adjacent to residential populations, open space, vistas, creeks, mountains, and areas of social gathering. c. Consider multiple loops and an overall N/A N/A N/A N/A Mid network of options that meet a wide range of abilities when developing trails. d. Map trail corridors that provide flexibility N/A N/A N/A N/A Mid for the agency or developers needing to decide on the best locations to build trails. e. Explore railroad corridors, excess right- N/A N/A N/A N/A Mid of -ways, flood control channels and utility corridors along with linear public right-of- ways for trail feasibility. f. Explore linear parks that may qualify as N/A N/A N/A N/A Mid trails if they include recreational amenities and unique natural characteristics. g. Develop a dedicated Trails Master Plan. $250- b, d, a Staff time b, d, a Mid 300k h. Upon identification of a new project, N/A N/A N/A N/A Mid compare parcels with maps in Appendix E for possible trail development considerations such as construction easements or developer lead implementation. Appendix C: Recommendations Matrix 13 6.1 Include public a. Encourage public art that's representative N/A art of the community and builds on local context. b. Allocate areas within parks for art $100K- opportunities. $200K 6.2 Encourage a. Incorporate public plazas and gathering $1M- social areas within the public realm or park space. $5M interaction b. Provide areas for family gatherings and $1M- events. $2M c. Continue to create programmed activities N/A that encourage social interaction (i.e„ movies in the park, holiday events, etc,). d. Conduct a Regional Event Assessment TBD and creation of a signature event. N/A I Staff time I N/A I Short d,e $1.6K per d,e,f Mid art piece I b,d,e $23.7K- d,e,f Mid $30K b,c,d,e $12.4K- d,e,f Mid $16.1 K N/A $40K- a,d,e,f Short $50K TBD I TBD I TBD I TBD 6.3 Increase a. Identify and bring out the history and N/A N/A Staff time N/A identity and culture of the site and City. I relation of the b. Include informational signage that $100K- local natural identifies the character of the park and the $250K b,d,e $1K-$2K d,e,f per sign context surrounding neighborhood. and built b,d,e $1.6K per d,e,f monument environment c. Incorporate entry monuments or $500K- gateways into parks to aid in park identity. $750K d. Extend the natural environment into $100K- d,e $1.6K per d,e,f the park and park uses into natural non- $1M sign sensitive open spaces. Enhance a. Capture unique characteristics of the City N/A 6.4 N/A Staff time N/A character or park site that can be incorporated into each park, b, Integrate park theme and character into $250K- b,c,d,e $15.9K per d,e,f features and buildings. Include placemaking $500K acre as part of the review of future projects, c. Look to surrounding context and N/A N/A N/A N/A integrate into the character of the park. Short Short Short Short Short Mid Short Appendix Q Recommendations Matrix 14 71 Organize a. Work on a technology plan that $100K- d Staff time N/A Mid digital files establishes a digital record system for CAD $150K and develop a and Building Information Modeling (BIM) Citywide GIS files. databases b. Continue to build the City's GIS database $50K d Staff time N/A Short for all of the City's mapped data and build on the mapping from this study, cl Work with the Menifee Police Department N/A N/A Staff time N/A Mid to collect and map crime data to monitor safety and public property damage issues. 72 Increase usage a. Develop a technology plan to increase $100K b,c,d,e Staff time, d Short of security security cameras. $5K systems within b. Prioritize parks where safety concerns N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short the park system and other major issues are mentioned. O c. Increase the presence of park rangers N/A N/A $200K per a,c,d Short and staff in parks of concern. Ranger O (full cost) = 73 Update and a. Research and explore digital scheduling N/A N/A Staff time N/A I Short U enhance digital and facility management platforms. jl I- scheduling b. Set up a digital workflow for park $75K d,e Staff time N/A Short and facility planning, budgeting and implementation as (trainin g) management well as maintenance and replacements. c. Explore a marketing and communications N/A Short $10k d Staff time plan for customer/resident use of the system. 7.4 Include virtual a. Research and explore platforms to host N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short programs, virtual events. I events, and b. Establish working platforms and share d Staff $25K d Short activities events with the community. time/ j $10K- $20 K for 1 IT support c. Work with existing community center N/A N/A Staff time N/A Short classes to incorporate virtual programming, Appendix C: Recommendations Matrix 15 lives 0I11610I01010, '0liolio r W9, hI M, 0 a 5111111111111 0[CI� *Note; ATP project pages are from ATP created in 2020. Provided information may not reflect completed projects or current environment. cc EL C 0 0 a C V a w w LL z w 2 The following are relevant excerpts from the adopted bike and pedestrian master plan that are relevant for either linear parks, trails or improved access to parks. BIKEWAY RECOMMENDATIONS Through the community engagement process, ac- cess throughout Menifee via bicycling among other active transportation modes, were some of the top is- sues where residents wanted to see active transpor- tation improvements. Residents primarily wanted to see both bike paths away from the street and on the street. The analysis in Chapter two identified some of the deficiencies such as lack of bicycle facilities, bike parking, and lighting. Using similar methodology as the City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Demand Model, proposed bicycle projects were identified and bicycle improvements were developed for the top ten proj- ects. The proposed projects form a comprehensive, low -stress network, including bicycle facilities on every major (arterial) street and several smaller (lo- cal) streets. The plan recommends a total of 93 bikeway projects that equate to 183.3 miles of new bikeways. Of these, 4 percent are multi -use paths, 60 percent are bicycle lanes, and 36 per- cent are bicycle routes. Opportunities for separat- ed bikeways/cycle tracks should be explored when developing detailed concepts for class 2 bike lanes where right-of-way is available. Along the top ten proposed routes, recommenda- tions were developed based on community input and data from Chapters Two and Three, field ob- servations, and previous planning and CIP projects. The Recommended Projects are mapped by facility types and identification number accompanied with tables listing detailed information such as location, route type, and extent. The following project sheets provide a brief description, maps, and metrics as- sociated with each of the top ten bikeway projects. These project sheets can be used to help guide fu- ture development, CIP projects, and grant pursuits. Please refer to Figure 4-1: Bikeway Project Recom- mendations for all 93 bikeway project locations. Each of these proposed projects represent a vari- ety of street types that currently lack safe access and mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non -motorized modes. These treatments are import- ant to mending existing safety and connectivity gaps within the City's current bicycle network. They can be implemented at the interval that best fits fund- ing cycles, city discretion, or to take into consider- ation the availability of new information, new funding sources, updated collision statistics, updated CIP lists, etc. PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA Once the prioritization process was completed, the bikeway projects were sorted into three tiers of pri- oritization based on score. The first tier of priority projects is composed of the ten highest scoring bike- way projects that were selected for further analysis. These Top Ten Projects will create a priority network of complete streets that will improve non -motorized travel and transit use throughout the City of Menifee. Due to funding and implementation purposes, the remaining proposed bikeway projects were orga- nized into the second and third tiers of prioritization based on score. The second tier of bikeway projects was composed of bikeway projects scoring in the bottom half percentile. The third tier of bikeway proj- ects was composed of bikeway projects scoring in the bottom quarter percentile. Listed below is a brief description of Tables 4-1 through 4-3 and Figures 4-2 through 4-4 Table 4-1 and Figure 4-2: Tier One - Top Ten Bike- way Projects, include the Top Ten Priority Projects that sum up to 49.5 miles of proposed bicycle fa- cilities. Table 4-2 and Figure 4-3: Tier Two Bikeway Proj- ects, include the Tier Two recommended projects that sum up to 91 miles of proposed bicycle facil- ities. Table 4-3 and Figure 4-4: Tier Three Bikeway Projects, include the Tier Three recommended projects that sum up to 42.8 miles of proposed bicycle facilities. The following detailed cut sheets (Figures 4-5 through 4-14) highlight each of the Top Ten priority corridors including existing conditions as well as their proposed recommendations. Design concepts, cost estimates and characteristics are also included for each corridor. Schools, parks, and other metrics were derived from data included in a quarter -mile buffer from the corridor. All bikeway priority projects within this section are planning level concepts. Fur- ther evaluation regarding funding and implementa- tion will be required for these concepts. 64 Appendix D: ATP Recommended Projects is 11' wool .u.n.u.1..ip" Fr.n.n. In I O ; roost; M r, •• p� fN j 0■un. =. _ 41, dead, ?R11.ea, weIStan la.anyaaaui'sba'ugot .au1aul i .1.niiNaoa♦ • 00. %:: ■ : e ■■ ..::: ad.. . ....... :....i....=a...lua.... our Map .a1.�i.Mala..al araah�ala.a■..atalltaa.l■1. .bra : 040 11, 71ua...V•ai1"lau•.au/■f=M1Boosting a■.l■:t1..f.■a1.a.a assets f♦♦ juua.wul.uula/•1/1.Siauu.a�.n..ln '..an.��-�,-• ,� iaa.uil.auq�aJ uw■l.isa: •� .ar • : S u.uuff 1aftlauaa •on � ri�•S F. � =-afrni.�Uiian O ��• ? rair■L w ' oft 41188 as 2 ......... u '' Q- nulaia� .c- .. .,uuu.■ n.wu.wnu � ■u`�i.. • • 41 yy+ ■Y�4Vfr� s. !W "■■■\fftipu.aa■�■TI■agels; n*Osgoodas ••;a.nuu �tl.la.tl.11.11.II.II�Ya11.1.a f■■f.,Oafs..■'.f111 Q■./■■■■a■+■■�■... �w1:a■waa■saKaailiitaaahua�aaa� 1 rail o....... inuuuC > uAua.�aun j nu.ap : Salt Creek Trail = _ -"'.1.■ : ` ? / ounua� �.a•v.L - �n■.nn;......../uuuyialy �ni■u;... .....usinge .iiialiiiara■.ulilaal � Existing Segment - . % ., ■ .,� .� .e Future Segment uuau*= TpaunnlrAans.p...71m C iau..ua=...n1..iluyur. Proposed Bike Projects - an � 3.ilnnn.a � Ouual� iun.u{ � . % - - % �', = ■ ■ sea ■"' Class I : Multi -Use Path G '•�� : �n1.��i�■w..■1».u»biiwi.y�ii.u.»�-r».sir»r�i1.Qy.pnrerr�u - - % rrrivrr�■.t,■.att��= Class II : Bike Lane Class III : Bike Route/Bike; •'% ; % a.....;a. „� ..■n1u...hf.... aawa..a Boulevard :• / �•. = n.lr. C LlT.n _ Existing Bike �li■�r1.11..1:0.tR1.11.1..Ir.1l.11 Facilities tt.titit.f;..! :IIt Class 1 Class 2 .11n IIi 2 la111siii r City Boundary FIGURE 4-1: Bikeway Project Recommendations C m 0 El 3 m a Ln Ln 0 Ln Ln Appendix D: ATP Recommended Projects 2 65 m a 0 0 0_ c co m U a w w u_ Z w S 36% Class III Bike Route 4% Class I Multi -use Path Percentage of Facility Type 60% Class II Bike Lane TABLE 4-1: Tier One - Top Ten Bikewav Proiects RANK CORRIDOR FROM STREET TO STREET CLASS LENGTH COST (MILES) 1 Menifee Rd Mapes Rd City limit II 7.8 $5,051.129 ' 2 Murrieta Rd Ethanac Rd ___ Scott Rd II 5.6 $6.900,219 3 Bradley Rd Rouse Rd Scott Rd II 4.7 $4,851,999 4 Newport Rd _ City limit Menifee Rd II 1.3 $155,475 City limit II/III -r I 1 5 1 $1,145,767 i Aldergate Dr/Antelope Rd/ 5 Evening Star Dr Summoner/Tally ! 6 La Piedra Rd Murrieta Rd _ Valley Blvd Menifee Rd II 3.3 $218,714 7 _ McCall Blvd Menifee Rd II 3.5 $1,664,199 8 Goetz Rd Ethanac Rd Newport Rd City limit II II 4.6 $5.599.607 8.6 $7,944,266 9 Briggs Rd Mapes Rd 10 Barnett Rd/Phoenix Way/Sun City Ethanac Rd Ridgemoor Rd II/III 4.4 $1,101,723 Blvd 66 Appendix D: ATP Recommended Projects 3 T rut■�rrnViii�a�rra■stlfraaaarairliMl■IYlWilgiNft- c j • 7 +�uuanaa�aneaanic 7latlaatrw-Srmail lrlogo, gas 1;IaanafairiNViteggs games Ilan: •■ti��atrtt>•`�+aaVytrt�aaaa `eai■inaieu■rf•� --'ji■uufiuunuapnaan�aa�ara� iufrn■i■uuuaaiallr�nbuunta7uuuu^ij Ji;7 �'.� 1.uaua�Iil�Ibii{■n,a.i�aurusiu■uuianmeseemIam"lle Vr -lose- Vf ; ,� �aaaa■ i iI■unwna�nanf�a�eeSinnuaj■nrnn 'annri � � � � - � %-atiilrr�it��ammfN'••a a�lln11�11�1It■IUW 7r� a1..�aa was iu e/I- ul.o�� air+- e 46 a J•iaJa•at 'f'e�f�ra■Sa' �� .. � � g LIuI • tpfaa ar■ • +i: . ■;� a :ua...:.t�ji1i....; � J•y� �0"•i �nunnfY�6ian.a ae� � ` t �e j i •6 4 ■eefa�� >✓.__'_+= tt •fie ■ .Pau11W F4.., pfnud,a■■eananaS7�a�»nab: � ■ - � �- . :-., ualna�I . nos-..-,. . iur 7rta Q. eneaya -L-r -ao �-- �.a�uoa©unanu :j��_��►a■aairian{ tAl _. r ,�Sauaav Iatanla■Iwu a4ngr�ui • 3■ �a■ aai Ile Saea iuraaaaarnrnrurut:Ya:ri rflRod (aeeeluehiiitri reeawnuanu =riataVaullaaaitiUilaaah4a�uav r�aa1 - IN : : - ■r1 u■uan..0 SuauuaR=�u8nar'2831 - j in�l■ay � i : : Salt Creek Trail u iil�na - nun,ru `rj1i':1i�ti utaauuur Existing Segmentme _ . •.,• �_. ■ .,�. j e_ Future Segment _ u■nu*- T■uunnftAanuapnalnu j innnatja■auanivayaan= Proposed Bike Projects- �fllnnanet •anue■i caratID ■■zo-se Class I : Multi -Use Path i - ' �� ■' = �', �ne■a�e•eelhaalllelall/ells.JrygliJVlJJ�IJIYJJJJ(/kfll�rf '� - rrriftrr: aa>•■r�f�i�l Class II: Bike Lane ! j ; • •• - is �� ■atrtaat Class III: Bike Route/Bike j �•�� : ■ I� =�ea.aanaaat wsell anna:Lu;ul noun Boulevard 'i • �� : : �': : �un�a+�u- �nru�'ruw�nru� Existing Bike 2 16 •s = ''K"'. _ is Facilities,ei■itinrururfi�arnrnrornwrntnaiaiaatitra ivai Class 1 Class 2 umutf i City Boundary �aa�umr FIGURE 4-2: Tier One - Top Ten Bikeway Projects M 3 3 m 73 a m 0 In S� 0 m Appendix D: ATP Recommended Projects 4 67 0 0 0- Ln c 0 V Q TABLE 4-2: Tier Two Bikeway Projects Q CORRIDOR FROM STREET TO STREET a I Z J COST 11 Sherman Rd/Laguna Vista Dr/Town Center Newport Rd Wickerd Rd II/III 2.74 $215,062 Goetz Rd Goetz Rd 01 ( 1.87 $147.046 Ethanac Rd El Puente St II/III 2.49 $234,979 12 East Dr/Kabian Park Rd/Mountain View PI 13 Encanto Dr 14 Canyon Heights/Cheyenne Canyon/Escalante Goetz Rd Canyon Heights Dr 111 1.52 Evans Rd III 3.84 Briggs Rd II 4.69 $119,419 15 Lazy Creek Rd/Rim Creek Path/Pelion Rd Bradley Rd $897,866 $368.004 16 Holland Rd City limit 17 Lindenberger Rd Heritage Lakes Dr Domenigoni Pkwy It 1.36 $106,876 Briggs Rd II 4.25 $333,358 Wickerd Rd II 2.79 $218,941 18 McLaughlin Rd Goetz Rd 19 Evans Rd Lazy Creek Rd 20 Sherman Rd Watson Rd Mapes Rd 1-215 Alta Vista Way Boggs Rd II 3.02 $237.223 II/III 2 94 $230.448 III 2.09� $489,582 21 22 Alta Vista Way/Avenida Halago/Bavaria McCall Blvd Chambers Ave 23 Rouse Rd Byers Rd Menifee Rd II 3.44 $270,419 24 25 Conejo Dr/Juanita Dr/Las Flores Dr Goetz Rd Goetz Rd III 2.38 $186,906 111 153 $120,172 Lindenberger Rd Garbani Rd City Limit 26 Pebble Beach Dr McCall Blvd Piping Rock Dr Goetz -Rd Goetz Rd Valley Blvd L Antelope Rd III 2.27 $178,168 27 Avenida de las Flores/Paseo la Plaza 111 1.13 $88,325 II T2.36 $185,410_ 28 Chambers Ave 29 Ethanac Rd Goetz Rd Matthews Rd II 3.05 $239.775 30 Matthews Rd Ethanac Rd Briggs Rd 1/11 2.42 $189,885 31 Newport Rd/Rockport Rd Menifee Rd Briggs Rd II 1.04 $242,331 32 Valley Blvd McLaughlin Rd Murrieta Rd II 3.27 $764,216 33 UNAMED Menifee Rd Domenigoni Pkwy 1 0.5 $117,619 34 Tres Lagos Dr Menifee Rd Southshore Dr II 0.56 $43,796 35 Bundy Canyon Rd/Scott Rd City limit Leon Rd II 6.49 r $1,517,746 36 Palomar Rd Mapes Rd Boulder Ridge Elementary School 11 2.4 $560,345 37 Palomar Rd Holland Rd Scott Rd 111 ! 1.99 $466,228 38 Malaga Rd Mapes Rd McLaughlin Rd 111 1.51 $352,559 39 Cherry Hills Blvd Valley Blvd Bradley Rd I 11 1.45 $338,486 40 UNAMED Lindenberger Rd Lindenberger Rd 1 1.04 $242,425 41 Vista Way Naranja Dr Conejo Dr 111 0.59 $138,209 42 Shadel Rd Encanto Dr Sun City Blvd Menifee Rd Sherman Rd II 0.47 $37,283 Honeyrun Rd 111 1.99 $156,481 Briggs Rd II 1 $78.653 43 Ridgemoor Rd/Boulder Crest/Springbrook 44 Simpson Rd 45 Antelope Rd Mapes Rd Rouse Rd II I 1.96 $153,542 46 Mapes Rd Sherman Rd Briggs Rd II 2.53 $198.364 47 i El Rancho Dr/Piping Rock Rd/Potomac Dr i Bradley Rd Bradley Rd III 1.34 $312,597 48 Coastline Ave Menifee Rd Heritage Lakes Dr II 0.22 $52,326 49 Junipero Rd Menifee Rd McCall Blvd 111 0.5 $117,485 50 Grosse Point Dr _ I Chambers Ave Cherry Hills Blvd _ _ III 51 . Albion Ln/Hanover Ln Antelope Rd Craig Ave III 0.84 $195,799 j 0.81 $190,119 52 Garbani Rd City limit Briggs Rd 11 111 53 Chester Morrison Way/School Park Dr Bradley Rd La Plectra Rd 111 5.8 $1,355,251 1 0.54 $126,231 68 Appendix D: ATP Recommended Projects :111 jtessil, eeU Ue�te�rY�nelet�tn Rn■. - i 3ie!!!n eruct • !t®e• Tuu■r/�n•twOrl�ngalo��1�'iom! juosu,auos■u�uwu�l�uwrr�luniuuiw•• �bnuuu•�nt rt�.u�u� �i osuosw■ost mis"�t`ososose n reueos� �_•�i _ • 8'osev�itlyosnn■ie■usr�l^m tostset •d"•:. 7 : trY - 4A un; %fir : �• •_ '1651188 a, sea; iY r Sx /IIO11.1,.11.11'•?.•/1.,1.t1.,� :....f\..��•3 ,1,. t.� r 4J. coser •Jess'n •e LO .. 21 me Valms Fees % C Cad I • r• a t j e•rr �' •• l ••w!r !+Nle • qR... f � ` ist! r r All o rnr�r� ��.•• p�r�e�ososttatitute•tS 4+. r Mile ■ J .. else 7.1 1.1 j ,,,e�ti� '—�"—ire _ +► -i. tlilllt.■/■1!llt�,■■! ._-��!■��rt� mass. 13 r f� Senate atn•eit ■ttt�teroseiS 3 -•1en■ulr At : 11w��ii/u�t�••• 1 N !� = �11.11. u.u.u��1f 1i 1�Y all • • �'� ' ••ee 1�ul nuueost tn.Tpn•e,itOu�eL.liiiiijiur: rotL • •i ' �= 3W inuu■i 7osuuej .. ^�nwos�ylr Salt Creek Trail Sty.■■■ w�e�� : r : ,t,e,ee,iwetrtrS/CZL1os r�twosr:�tostriej.eosostrnosleose>,osr Existing Segment - • : •� �• 3 Future Segment • - - : iclose utter S•nualeiInetel'AllAssa : I�t,•nr�osrnnAosyos� Proposed Bike Projects J.:.r..t.: .... r.tl... = uuu■■ Class I ; Multi -Use Path ,•,. � i•lattwn,ylu9�u�t gin! c®1t�rn=tal-rb-111MenY,e•llei"�tuaosIlas nostuuuL Class II: Bike Lane 4 �: C ■ �■.r.e t•`_ - ■ituan■ti • .•nunutenr•t�._ ��l�� Class III : Bike Route/Bike ' •L A•0 At= ?�.w■ t1.e1.^.r1.11.11.n i' : Boulevard • : ; Existing Bike,�r11.11.t1j11.te�11.,1.11.11.1,tjlLAIC �.elil' Facilities Class 1 Class 2 Iln�u� �loltmr City Boundary FIGURE 4-3: Tier Two Bikeway Projects Appendix D: ATP Recommended Projects 6 69 m a C 0 0 a m H TABLE 4-3: Tier Three Bikeway Projects x „ Z CORRIDOR FROM STREET TO STREET I a Z J COST M I U -� 54 Augusta Dr _ Sun City Blvd Bradley Rd III 0.27 $62,112 55 Wickerd Rd Byers Rd Briggs Rd II 3.6 $840,302 56 Los Carrizos Rd/Morgan Horse St Holland Rd Garbani Rd 1 1.02 $238,008 57 Cadena Dr/Citation Ave Menifee Rd Briggs Rd I III 1.01 $236,501 58 La Ladera Rd Normandy Rd Honeyrun Rd III 0.84 $197,383 59 Craig Ave Byers Rd Menifee Rd II 1.7 $396,997 60 Lindenberger Rd/Southshore Dr La Piedra Rd Tres Lagos Dr III 0.5 $117,057 61 Lake Forest Dr El Rancho Dr Potomac Dr III 0.35 1 $82,637 62 Canyon Dr Goetz Rd Valley Blvd 1 1.88 $440,080 63 Honeyrun Rd Lone Pine St Valley Blvd II 0.65 $152,368 64 Haun Rd/Zeiders Rd Holland Rd Keller Rd 1/11 3.01 $703,153 65 Little Reb PI/Bellamy Ln/Tulita Ln Scott Rd Menifee Rd III 1.45 $338,530 66 Evans Rd Ethanac Rd Rouse Rd III 0.99 _ $230,545 67 Butterwood Dr/Country Fair Dr La Ladera Rd La Ladera Rd III 0.38 $88,044 68 Skyward Trl/Thornton Ave/Turfwood St Rouse Rd/Murrieta Rd Valley Blvd III 1.1 $258,113 69 Normandy Rd Audie Murphy Rd Spirit Park ill 0.68 $159,863 70 Beth Dr Byers St Murrieta Rd III 0.51 $118,245 $646,653 $4,134,559 71 Byers Rd I Ethanac Rd Walden Rd III 2.77 72 Audie Murphy Rd Goetz Rd Goetz Rd III 1.84 Rouse Rd III 0.98 $229,859 73 Hull St Ethanac Rd 74 I Hayden Rd/Walden Rd Wickerd Rd Tucker Rd 111 0.63 $146,469 75 Sequoia Springs Dr Ridgemoor Rd Honeyrun Rd III 0.21 $48,118 76 UNAMED Murrieta Rd Evans Rd 1 0.5 $115,790 77 Presley St Rouse Rd Sun City Blvd III 0.45 $106.163 78 Tucker Rd _ Wickerd Rd Scott Rd III 0.5 $1,121.294 79 Daily Rd/Keller Rd/Wright Rd Bundy Canyon Rd Bundy Canyon Rd III 2.63 $615,079 80 Keller Rd Kasper Ln Scenic View Dr III 0.8 $185,839 81 Goodrich Dr/Nova Ln/Starr Dr Hull St Evans Rd III 0.52 $121,220 82 Mira St Wickerd Rd Scott Rd I III 0.5 $39,253 83 Tupelo Rd Sherman Rd Bradley Rd III 0.5 $39,279 84 Curzulla Rd/Merritt Rd Briggs Rd/Scott Rd Leon Rd III 1.41 $330.453 85 Mc Bob Rd/Hoffman Ln Scott Rd Keller Rd III 1.38 $322,246 -� - 86 Woodbine Ln Lindenberger Rd Briggs Rd III 0.5 - $1,119,329 87 I Weldon Rd Bundy Canyon Rd Murrieta Rd III 0.85 $199.293 88 Arcadia Ln/Barker Ln/Edmiston Rd Bundy Canyon Rd Wright Rd III 1.96 $457.903 89 Ciccotti St/Gloria Rd Howard Rd Keller Rd Keller Rd III 111 0.62 1.5 $145,569 $3,373,036 90 Howard Rd Wickerd Rd 91 Heim St Bradley Rd Scott Rd Howard Rd _ III i Keller Rd 11 0.5 1 $1,129,173 $78,679 92 Leaon Rd 93 Derby Hill Dr Newport Rd Taawila Elementary 111 0.31 I $72,443 70 Appendix D: ATP Recommended Projects •urnrururn ■ j �nua■ i � ■IIrISY11M irJ Salt Creek Trail !7 O. .—� --- _ e jor 21018.41.Ill�enasiolb .1.1�.■a.a�...• • 1. 1/r11aT i.1..A.i...1...l1.. �.. ■... a..■a7a..■ t r■r1�.r..rll�.r..wl�wvwwy .J •� '�• ■.apu�l.4oit �ja*.juului■aaun:an.uupuaui .. .yir �.. C Ndate L.uua nq.u.as+; ■ a.auaabnu.■ a.ea+tit • _ � ` pnu.e[��nuur•• �.■urururururur.Ir run nee rtl■ Mr nai ■.n■./.�ilwn■ Existing Segment . a>, Future Segment t Proposed Bike Projects ; �;a...l.sA alone -on Class I : Multi -Use Path �eeeeN••o"•at••w Class If: Bike Lane .••i eeoneeee Class III: Bike Route/Bike �•0 Boulevard 0 i Existing Bike Facilities Class t Class 2 16Ie11 ter City Boundary to : 7 9l;f lllrllrll FIGURE 4-4: Tier Three Bikeway Projects le • ■ ti7� Inner.�n.n.�rnni�i.niu.�.,q,. • • 9 i .. xx I�j ■ : : � � � ir.f�M1•../ IIr IIr : �a114 t �� •• -! s aa}' 11r11r11r11r111:16 IJunn!/ 6u� Appendix D: ATP Recommended Projects 8 71 Appendix Conceptual Trail Areas for Further Review and Partnership Opportunities with Landowners Trails are for experiences. Experiencing nature, fresh air, incorporating fitness, even visualizing what an area may have looked like before development and catching views not seen from a vehicle. Trails often have to be seen from the eye of a hiker, bicyclist, mountain biker, runner, jogger, power walker or from a child's eye hiking or rolling on skates or a skateboard. Obtaining the experience of seeing a natural area, or getting to the top of a peak and seeing the view, or just following milepost markers to get exercise, often results in a well deserved reward for those that just get out there. Many of the existing trails in Menifee are of the variety that go around a development, a water body or into a park. These are great resources of which some are open to the public and others are not. The trail sys- tem could provide an outer greenbelt system of trails that connect the heritage and beauty of Menifee. Future development will continue the trend of build- ing trail amenities since most developers know that customers buying into new communities want to own or live in an area that is not just another sub- division. When trails are provided, they promote physical activity, social interaction and help to set the character of a development. Salt Creek Trail The potential development of trails in this study fo- cuses not on active transportation paths for getting around, although they can be part of a trail system. The focus is on the experience. The experience is centered on open space areas that contain natural or near natural conditions, and showcase the ge- ography and geology of an area, or help to tell a story about what an area is or used to be. The are- as identified on the maps are just potentials. They can become assets only if they are pursued at the municipal level or by partnerships with developers. It is not the intent of this section to suggest that the City has a right to build in these areas. Private prop- erty ownership, zoning and development potential must all be taken into account and feasibility and willingness of owners determined. These areas are the starting point to find new locations for public trails but will require substantial planning, negoti- ations, design and engineering as well as funding for acquisition or developer dedication before any trails can be completed. Paloma Wash Trail Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations Trail Map and Open Space Overview 1 L-------- -1------- t 1 ♦, � �1 / _♦a�� % /'-1 a � -tea I � ♦ !IL._ 4r4.- 1 1 1 1 t 1 � '• ^�--_� / • `.j-.sue r � 7 t t 1 iFuture Planned Parks _ Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections City-wide Parks ♦ Potential Trailhead Locations Valley -Wide Parks Potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections Salt Creek Trail Existing Segment - - - - Potential Open Space Trails Future Segment Potential Greenbelt Loop Boundary Potential Open Space Areas 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 4 Miles Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations .ft 1. Quail Valley Area Open Space ETHANAC RD t •, 7 QO ' __ • era dt � • -'�~ l , m I Future Planned City Parks Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections � La L era am City-wide Parks ® Possible Trailhead Locations Pa"M Valley -Wide Parks potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections Salt Creek Trail Srve• �'■ Potential Open Space Trails tar Park • —= Existing Segment Loop � "' Boundary Potential Greenbelt 0 rk Potential Open Space Areas ORS 14�Q Ranc Audi& titurppny S Pars . A "Raw- i o s r MAC Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations 3 2. Powerline Trail Opportunities ■ Manai.V. ley Park * and Com Center ■ Ellen;ark --' ETMANAC ■ RD r • Park •' r f 7afav@Park n W }� ROUSE 0'l�hii nvood Remiingto■n f He ake ► Dare Aar* • ■''' ' EIAAASE72S.ANE � He fPant o .4••• JACC`.ALL SLVD W ■- • • 1, t t pa p- " Z .- �• �s�overy■• - ■ PSua;kPark ,. SIMPSON RD :, r� • ' SUN CITY Som ` . r+��• aq Hentag�MatLogany C,41 F m je,yhts Park Creek park ` RIDGEWOOQ' �, 0 f '� • • to O - 'aSclerga(e'Park Grand • Future Planned CityParks Vista ■ Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections r , Park eanner,lTu City-wide Parks ® Possible Trailhead Locations Pepita tPPRI! t ouare Park II Valley -Wide Parks Potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections ■ ° Vie, Salt Creek Trail Gn Potential Open Space Trails • Existing Segment i foma,_ Potential Greenbelt Loop0 rk �y•r� _ ■ Future Segmenti .� oBoundary Potential Open Space Areas d �_ tl i • Lago Vista nULLANU KU Sports Pa•4"" Ce_ntgnn 1 Hidden mark Meadows Park_ _ Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations 4 3. Menifee Hills Area North uder Park ETHANAC RD L ■ 'I • ■ me Mamma, Pow IdIMSMa ■ ars N wasN- a • • T 1�e�ra •• Park• • .� RemmgtUF 1 aar. • • • • ®' i• • • • Future Planned City Parks Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections City-wide Parks ® Possible Trailhead Locations Valley -Wide Parks Potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections • a �.. Boundary potential Open Space Trails `• • •• Potential Greenbelt Loop •• `• Potential Open Space Areas Mc( au • Canyon � Park .• • Park • • • Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations 5 4. Menifee Hills Area South t �♦ •• • • `♦ ♦♦ • 1f ' McCall • . . f • Canyo;, Park*o + •�. • •+ • •♦ • ••• ♦ •♦ t ' •........ • a • • ♦ ♦ , . i • • ' ' • • - SO4APSON RD f • • • . w .. ► 4 • t •• . • • • • � Henraye f '• r • • T HOiyhfS + ; f fll Park � f • f. • f I•far f Aldergate ' • ■ ■ a to ■ h • , ♦ Pa + •e ■• •'r I�7 Ar��,A Grand Future Planned City Parks Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections Vista Park City-wide Parks ® Possible Trailhead Locations Valley -Wide Parks c ■ ■ Potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections Salt Creek Trail mass Potential Open Space Trails Existing Segment Peprta Square Park Future Segment Potential Greenbelt Loop Desert Green Park Boundary Potential Open Space Areas ,' r s ■ ■ w ■ ■ • ■ M Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations g 5. North Paloma Wash / Piping Creek Road Open Space Area u Future Planned City Parks Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections City-wide Parks Possible Trailhead Locations iValley -Wide Parks Potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections u Boundary • • • Potential Open Space Trails Potential Greenbelt Loop 0 Potential Open Space Areas Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations 6. East Menifee Open Space Area yy� d a Brindle Mills. Park Manuyany creek •,IOCkBf Park HeMage _ Manuyany ergs, Per 1 Do acfo (re�k.narrki ■ Par K Y ® Alder ate • • a r ■ �� ' • g ■a aass Park o4ii—ri . Uj ' 16 i ' •• t' Grand Vista < Park © �— Peprta , squa& Park 1 QF Desert sw� Green Perk 2 s • a ■ ■ a ■ ■ R a ■ • s ■ ■ La Paloma . �j Park Lago, Vista Sports. Park N Salt Creek Trail • Existing Segment . ' • .. ■ ■ • ■ Future Segment Future Planned City Parks City-wide Parks • Valley -Wide Parks • Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections ' ® Possible Trailhead Locations ' Potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections ' ■ ■ ■ Potential Open Space Trails Potential Greenbelt Loop 'i LU Potential Open Space Areas Proposed Open Space Boundary G'ente ,ma; Vz'l7fM1.(f •. Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations 8 Z Mason Mountain / Heather Ridge Hill Area D E L Pete Peen La ■ • • • q • SunAP,ark b • Sl u N� • Gree ` • r • ew rark o t F rich PO f import 2rk-. .-�. . 0® tom" r ■ • � ti- • • ft►Y�1 � ' • • •Ilk 8, i a l� ■ a Ar '.'�f••`.r1• f fsftf.Y.r ff1�lffr 1 1 F s ■ Future Planned City Parks Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections x s City-wide Parks ® Possible Trailhead Locations a ■ Valley -Wide Parks Potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections Salt Creek Trail _ _ = Potential Open Space Trails Existing Segment a Boundary Potential Greenbelt Loop s Potential Open Space Areas0 3 r a' d I a �• r Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations 9 8. Paloma High School Area 11 w • s w . w ^W_=-MWV__ Ff t� ......................:.. ....`;' � • I L,_ . ■ ir. �. — Pa Sim060 . )� ................ i 44 ■ ■ r Ila Future Planned City Parks 1� City-wide Parks valley -Wide Parks '* Public Agency Ownership r7 Boundary Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections ® Possible Trailhead Locations Potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections • . Potential Open Space Trails Potential Greenbelt Loop Potential Open Space Areas 0 Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations 10 9. Bell Mountain Open Space ^• Imo:. 8agorV1 a - Sports � Park i arr��e-�ea oee"e■'mar."asr e+sa�rr_ �. if • � ham: � / x`• :`_ �, E Hill s -1 it Par, e4-J, 't - a� . • . , Future Planned City Parks r L� '� ' `••r• City-wide Parks AV Valley -Wide Parks JIMV 1 • ElBoundary w w LL z d W i •4.1 • • ■ ■ ■ - ,. , -S Lit Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections ® Possible Trailhead Locations Potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections - Potential Open Space Trails Potential Greenbelt Loop Potential Open Space Areas Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations m 10. Woodbine Lane Area SCOTT RD �e 0 � o W Z a O O ra Q t' o J J W d ,e - - �aA1iWA BC �4CABat-r7- - -- — Future Planned City Parks Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections City-wide Parks ® Possible Trailhead Locations Valley -Wide Parks Potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections Boundary n - Potential Open Space Trails Potential Greenbelt Loop Potential Open Space Areas 0 Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations 12 11. Ram Ranch / Greer Ranch Area N Y VVICKE w O tier" � WALDON RD ln�Ui N NC Y U H N z CENTURION DR w 0 9UNDY CANYON-RD SPRINGTOVVTV RD :k K z pit,; A ROUFUS RD ' O■ M ADOW RD,, • RAMS RI •..r... lot c • �. O 5 J • all ■ s VAUGHAA.iiEtlsl �•, „ " ' ELROY RD • t • • mU E ■ • O • •.rr rr• EDMISTON _ ^ • • Or .� RD r� • • uv�rfi.r OR ■ r ■ ...............r.M_ i • .a � .X Future Planned City Parks Existing Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections City-wide Parks Possible Trailhead Locations Valley -Wide Parks Potential Non -vehicular Park and Open Space Connections F7Boundary ■ � = R Potential Open Space Trails Potential Greenbelt Loop Potential Open Space Areas 0 Appendix E: Conceptual Trail Recommendations 13 MENIFEE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF MENIFEE ) I, Stephanie Roseen, Acting City Clerk of the City of Menifee, do hereby certify that the foregoing City Council Resolution No. 23-1348 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Menifee at a meeting thereof held on the 19th Day of July 2023 by the following vote: Ayes: Deines, Estrada, Karwin, Sobek, Zimmerman Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: None • -.hie Roseen, Acting City