Loading...
2011/02/09 Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District National Pollutant Discharge Santa Ana Region- Implementation Agreement 1 135930 2 AGREEMENT 3 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 4 Urban Runoff Discharge Permit Implementation Agreement 5 Santa Ana Region 6 (Santa Ana Drainage Area) 7 This Agreement, entered into as of this day of �rH­wl e' , 2011 by 8 the RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 9 (herein called DISTRICT), the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (herein called COUNTY), and the 10 CITIES OF BEAUMONT, CALIMESA, CANYON LAKE, CORONA, EASTVALE, HEMET, 11 LAKE ELSINORE, MENIFEE, MORENO VALLEY, MURRIETA, NORCO, PERRIS, 12 13 RIVERSIDE, SAN JACINTO and WILDOMAR, (herein called CITIES), establishes the 14 responsibilities of each party concerning compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge 15 Elimination System (NPDES) Urban Runoff Discharge Permit (NPDES Permit) issued by the 16 California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region pursuant to Order No. 17 R8-2010-0033. This Agreement effectively terminates the Implementation Agreement adopted 18 on December 16, 2003. 19 20 RECITALS 21 WHEREAS, in 1987 Congress added Section 402(p) to the Federal Clean Water 22 Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C. §1342(p)); and 23 WHEREAS, Section 402(p) of the CWA requires certain municipalities, 24 industrial facilities and persons conducting certain construction activities to obtain an NPDES 25 Permit before discharging stormwater into navigable waters; and 26 27 WHEREAS, Section 402(p) further requires the Federal Environmental 28 Protection Agency(EPA)to promulgate regulations for NPDES Permit applications; and - 1 - 1 135930 2 WHEREAS, EPA adopted such regulations in November 1990; and 3 WHEREAS, EPA delegated authority to the California Regional Water Quality 4 5 Control Board-Santa Ana Region (RWQCB-SAR) to administer the NPDES permitting process 6 within the boundaries of that region; and 7 WHEREAS, DISTRICT was created to provide for the control of flood and 8 stormwaters within the County of Riverside and is empowered to investigate, examine, measure, 9 analyze, study and inspect matters pertaining to flood and stormwaters; and 10 WHEREAS, the COUNTY and CITIES have land use authorities and own and 11 12 operate Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) facilities; and 13 WHEREAS, on August 30, 2000 DISTRICT, COUNTY and CITIES submitted 14 an NPDES Permit Application for an area-wide NPDES Permit; and 15 WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit Application was submitted in accordance with 16 the previous NPDES Permit (Order No. 96-30, NPDES No. CA 618033) which expired on 17 March 8, 2001; and 18 19 WHEREAS, RWQCB-SAR issued a NPDES Permit to DISTRICT, COUNTY 20 and CITIES on October 25, 2002; and 21 WHEREAS, on April 27, 2007 DISTRICT, COUNTY and CITIES submitted an 22 NPDES Permit Application for an area-wide NPDES Permit; and 23 WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit Application was submitted in accordance with 24 the previous NPDES Permit (Order No. R8-2002-0011,NPDES No. CA 618033) which expired 25 on October 26, 2007; and 26 27 WHEREAS, RWQCB-SAR issued a new NPDES Permit to DISTRICT, 28 COUNTY and CITIES on January 29, 2010; and - 2 - 1 135930 2 WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit governing municipal stormwater discharges 3 meets both the requirements of Section 402(p)(3)(B) of the CWA and all requirements 4 5 applicable to an NPDES Permit issued under RWQCB-SARs discretionary authority in 6 accordance with Section 402(a)(1)(B) of the CWA; and 7 WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit designates DISTRICT as the "Principal 8 Permittee", and COUNTY and CITIES as "Co-Permittees"; and 9 WHEREAS, cooperation between DISTRICT, COUNTY and CITIES in the 10 administration and implementation of the NPDES Permit is in the best interests of DISTRICT, 11 12 COUNTY and CITIES; and 13 WHEREAS, DISTRICT is willing to share the expertise of its staff with 14 COUNTY and CITIES so that they can join in implementing the requirements of the NPDES 15 Permit; and 16 WHEREAS, the RWQCB-SAR and the RWQCB-San Diego Region are 17 currently contemplating amendments to Order No. R8-2010-0033 and pending Order No. R9- 18 19 2010-0016 that would effectively allow MURRIETA and WILDOMAR to be wholly regulated 20 under Order No. R9-2010-0016 and MENIFEE to be wholly regulated under Order No. R8- 21 2010-0033; and 22 WHEREAS, MURRIETA and WILDOMAR would be subject to the LAKE 23 ELSINORE/CANYON LAKE NUTRIENT TMDL, independent of Order No. R8-2010-0033, 24 and therefore may be interested in participating in joint programs developed under this 25 Agreement to address the LAKE ELSINORE/CANYON LAKE NUTRIENT TMDL; and 26 27 WHEREAS, DISTRICT, COUNTY and CITIES are to perform certain activities 28 prescribed in the NPDES Permit and related to management of the NPDES Permit compliance - 3 - 1 135930 2 program that will benefit all parties. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: 4 5 1. Incorporation of the NPDES Permit. The NPDES Permit issued to 6 DISTRICT, COUNTY and CITIES by RWQCB-SAR pursuant to Order No. R8-2010-0033 is 7 attached to this Agreement as EXHIBIT A and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety 8 and made a part of this Agreement. 9 2. Delegation of Responsibilities. The responsibilities of each of the parties 10 shall be as described in the NPDES Permit and reiterated as follows: 11 12 a. DISTRICT shall assume the responsibilities and meet the requirements 13 of the NPDES Permit by complying with Section III.A 14 (RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PRINCIPAL PERMITTEE) and: 15 (1) Performing or coordinating all the joint sampling data collection 16 and assessment requirements described in the NPDES Permit 17 MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM. 18 (2) Performing all of the joint reporting requirements described in 19 20 the NPDES Permit MONITORING AND REPORTING 21 PROGRAM. With respect to such joint reporting requirements, 22 the DISTRICT shall specifically: 23 (a) Prepare the required narrative for all joint reports; and 24 (b) Provide COUNTY and CITIES an opportunity to review 25 and comment on any such narrative. 26 27 The cost for implementing the requirements of the joint activities 28 shall be jointly funded as shared costs as described in paragraphs 3 - 4 - 135930 1 2 and 4 of this Agreement. 3 b. DISTRICT, at no cost to COUNTY and CITIES, shall assume the 4 5 responsibilities and meet the requirements of the NPDES Permit by: 6 (1) Complying with Section III.A (RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE 7 PRINCIPAL PERMITTEE). 8 (2) Complying with Sections IV (LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION 9 PLAN), V (DISCHARGE PROHIBITIONS), VI (EFFLUENT 10 LIMITATIONS, DISCHARGE SPECIFICATIONS AND 11 OTHER TMDL RELATED REQUIREMENTS), VII 12 13 (RECEIVING WATER LIMITATIONS), VIII (LEGAL 14 AUTHORITY/ENFORCEMENT), IX (ILLICIT 15 CONNECTIONS/ILLEGAL DISCHARGES (IC/ID); LITTER, 16 DEBRIS AND TRASH CONTROL) , X (SEWAGE SPILLS, 17 INFILTRATION INTO THE MS4 SYSTEMS FROM 18 LEAKING SANITARY SEWER LINES, SEPTIC SYSTEM 19 20 FAILURES AND PORTABLE TOILET DISCHARGES) , XII 21 (NEW DEVELOPMENT (INCLUDING SIGNIFICANT 22 REDEVELOPMENT)), XIII (PUBLIC EDUCATION AND 23 OUTREACH), XIV (PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND 24 ACTIVITIES), XV (TRAINING PROGRAM FOR 25 STORMWATER MANAGERS, PLANNERS, INSPECTORS 26 27 AND MUNICIPAL CONTRACTORS), XVI (NOTIFICATION 28 - 5 - 1 135930 2 REQUIREMENTS), XVII (PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 3 ASSESSMENT/DAMP REVIEW), XVIII (FISCAL 4 5 RESOURCES), XIX (MONITORING AND REPORTING 6 PROGRAM), XX (PROVISIONS), XXI (PERMIT 7 MODIFICATION), XXII (PERMIT EXPIRATION AND 8 RENEWAL) as they pertain to DISTRICT facilities and 9 operations. 10 C. COUNTY and CITIES shall, at no cost to DISTRICT, assume the 11 12 responsibilities and meet the requirements of the NPDES Permit for 13 land area and facilities within their individual jurisdictions by: 14 (1) Complying with Section III.B (RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE 15 CO-PERMITTEES). 16 (2) Complying with Sections IV (LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION 17 PLAN), V (DISCHARGE PROHIBITIONS), VI (EFFLUENT 18 LIMITATIONS, DISCHARGE SPECIFICATIONS AND 19 20 OTHER TMDL RELATED REQUIREMENTS), VII 21 (RECEIVING WATER LIMITATIONS), VIII (LEGAL 22 AUTHORITY/ENFORCEMENT), IX (ILLICIT 23 CONNECTIONS/ILLEGAL DISCHARGES (IC/ID); LITTER, 24 DEBRIS AND TRASH CONTROL), X (SEWAGE SPILLS, 25 INFILTRATION INTO THE MS4 SYSTEMS FROM 26 LEAKING SANITARY SEWER LINES, SEPTIC SYSTEM 27 28 FAILURES, AND PORTABLE TOILET DISCHARGES), XI - 6 - 1 135930 2 (CO-PERMITTEE INSPECTION PROGRAMS), XII (NEW 3 4 DEVELOPMENT (INCLUDING SIGNIFICANT 5 REDEVELOPMENT)), XIII (PUBLIC EDUCATION AND 6 OUTREACH), XIV (PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND 7 ACTIVITIES), XV (TRAINING PROGRAM FOR 8 STORMWATER MANAGERS, PLANNERS, INSPECTORS 9 AND MUNICIPAL CONTRACTORS), XVI (NOTIFICATION 10 REQUIREMENTS), XVII (PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 11 12 ASSESSMENT/DAMP REVIEW), XVIII (FISCAL 13 RESOURCES), XIX (MONITORING AND REPORTING 14 PROGRAM), XX (PROVISIONS), XXI (PERMIT 15 MODIFICATION), XXII (PERMIT EXPIRATION AND 16 RENEWAL) as they pertain to COUNTY and CITIES facilities 17 and operations. 18 19 (3) Demonstrating compliance with all NPDES Permit requirements 20 through timely implementation of the approved Drainage Area 21 Management Plan (DAMP) and any approved modifications, 22 revisions, or amendments thereto. 23 (4) Providing to DISTRICT (on DISTRICT approved forms) all 24 information needed to satisfy the reporting requirements 25 described in the NPDES Permit MONITORING AND 26 27 REPORTING PROGRAM. The COUNTY and CITIES shall 28 specifically: - 7 - 1 135930 2 (a) Provide information on existing stormwater facilities 3 and/or other data as it pertains to COUNTY or CITIES 4 5 facilities when requested by DISTRICT. 6 (b) Submit their individual reports to DISTRICT for 7 incorporation into DISTRICT'S narrative no later than 8 November 1 of each year. 9 3. Budgets. On or before January 15 of each year, the DISTRICT shall 10 prepare and submit a budget for the next fiscal year to the Santa Ana/Santa Margarita Technical 11 12 Advisory Committee (TAC). The budget shall include anticipated costs and fees for District 13 services or consultant services to prepare manuals, develop programs, implement programs, 14 engage legal counsel on behalf of the Permittees or perform studies relevant to the entire Permit 15 Area. Once consensus has been reached amongst the TAC, the budget will be submitted to the 16 Management Steering Committee. 17 4. Shared Costs. In the event DISTRICT requires the services of a consultant 18 19 or consultants to prepare manuals, develop programs or perform studies relevant to the entire 20 Permit Area, the cost of said consultant services will be shared by DISTRICT, COUNTY and 21 CITIES. The shared costs shall be allocated as follows: 22 Party Percentage Contribution DISTRICT 50 23 COUNTY& CITIES 50 24 The individual percentage contribution from COUNTY and individual 25 CITIES shall be a function of population within the Permit Area. More specifically, such 26 27 contribution shall be calculated as the population of COUNTY or individual CITIES, divided by 28 the total population of all the Co-Permittees multiplied by 50, i.e.,: - 8 - 1 135930 2 Contribution (%) = 50(xn/xtot) 3 Xn = population of COUNTY or individual CITIES Xt°t = total population of COUNTY and CITIES in 4 the Santa Ana Region 5 50 = total percentage excluding DISTRICT portion 6 The population of COUNTY and CITIES will be based on the latest 7 California State Department of Finance population figures issued in May of each year. 8 The total shared cost of consultant services shall not exceed $1,000,000.00 9 annually. 10 11 COUNTY and CITIES shall be notified of DISTRICT'S request for 12 proposals from consultants, selection of a consultant, consultant's fee, and contract timetable and 13 Payment schedule through the TAC. 14 COUNTY and CITIES shall pay to DISTRICT their share of the shared 15 costs within 60 calendar days of receipt of an invoice from DISTRICT. 16 In the event that a subset of the COUNTY or CITIES require the services of 17 a consultant or consultants to prepare manuals, develop programs, implement programs, engage 18 19 legal counsel, perform studies or any work to satisfy sub-regional permit requirements, the costs 20 of said consultant services shall be shared by the involved parties, in such a manner as approved 21 by the involved parties. The involved parties may utilize this Agreement to hire a consultant. 22 Tasks performed consistent to this paragraph shall not be subject to the total shared cost limit of 23 $1,000,000 for area-wide programs. 24 5. Term of the Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on 25 the date the last duly authorized representative of DISTRICT, COUNTY or CITIES executed it. 26 27 The term of the Agreement shall continue to eighteen (18) months after the date that RWQCB- 28 SAR issues a new NPDES Permit in replacement of the existing NPDES Permit (Order No. R8- - 9 - 1 135930 2 2010-0033, NPDES No. CAS 618033) issued on January 29, 2010, unless each of the Co- 3 Permittees either amends this agreement or withdraws in accordance with the terms of this 4 5 Agreement. 6 6. Additional Parties. Any City which incorporates after the date of issuance 7 of the NPDES Permit and/or after the date of execution of this Agreement may file a written 8 request with DISTRICT asking to be added as a parry. Upon receipt of such a request, 9 DISTRICT shall solicit the approval or denial of each Co-Permittee. If a majority of the Co- lo Permittees, each having one, co-equal vote, approves the addition of the City, DISTRICT, on 11 12 behalf of the Co-Permittees, will ask RWQCB-SAR to add the City to the NPDES Permit as an 13 additional Co-Penmittee. Once the City is made an additional Co-Permittee to the NPDES 14 Permit, this Agreement shall be amended to reflect the addition, and the City shall, thereafter, 15 comply with all provisions of the NPDES Permit and this Agreement. Upon execution of the 16 amended Agreement, the City shall be responsible for the shared costs discussed in Section 4 of 17 this Agreement for the current and any subsequent budget year. 18 7. Withdrawal from the Agreement. Any parry may withdraw from this 19 20 Agreement 60 calendar days after giving written notice to DISTRICT and RWQCB-SAR. The 21 withdrawing party shall agree in such notice to file for a separate NPDES Permit and to comply 22 with all of the requirements established by RWQCB-SAR. In addition, withdrawal shall 23 constitute forfeiture of all of the withdrawing party's share of the costs paid described in Section 24 4 of this Agreement for that fiscal year. The withdrawing party shall be responsible for all 25 lawfully assessed penalties as a consequence of withdrawal. The cost allocations to the 26 27 remaining parties will be recalculated in the following budget year. 28 8. Non-compliance with Permit Requirements. Any party found in non- - 10 - 1 135930 2 compliance with the conditions of the NPDES Permit within its jurisdictional boundaries shall 3 4 be solely liable for any lawfully assessed penalties. This Agreement is not intended to and does 5 not create any joint and several liability of the parties for such penalties. Common or joint 6 penalties shall be calculated and allocated between the parties according to the formula outlined 7 in Section 4 of this Agreement. 8 9. Amendments to the Agreement. This Agreement may be amended by 9 consent of the parties which represent a majority of the percentage contribution as described in 10 Section 4 of this Agreement. Each party's vote shall be calculated according to the percentage 11 12 contribution of each party as described in Section 4 of this Agreement. No amendment to this 13 Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the duly authorized 14 representatives of the majority of the parties. 15 10. Authorized Signatories. The General Manager-Chief Engineer of 16 DISTRICT, the Chief Executive Officer of COUNTY and the City Managers of CITIES (or 17 their designees) shall be authorized to execute all documents and take all other procedural steps 18 19 necessary to file for and obtain an NPDES Permit(s) or amendments thereto. 20 11. Notices. All notices shall be deemed duly given when delivered by hand; 21 or three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid. 22 12. Governing Law. This Agreement will be governed and construed in 23 accordance with laws of the State of California. If any provision or provisions of this 24 Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and 25 enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired hereby. 26 27 13. Consent to Waiver and Breach. No term or provision hereof shall be 28 deemed waived and no breach excused, unless the waiver or breach is consented to in writing, - 11 - 1 135930 2 and signed b the art or parties affected. Consent b an art to a waiver or breach b an g Y party P Y Yp Y Y Y 3 other party shall not constitute consent to any different or subsequent waiver or breach. 4 5 14. Applicability of Prior Agreements, This Agreement and the exhibits 6 attached hereto constitute the entire Agreement between the parties with respect to the subject 7 matter; all prior agreements, representations, statements, negotiations and undertakings are 8 superseded hereby. 9 15. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered 10 in any number of counterparts or copies ("counterpart") by the parties hereto. When each party 11 12 has signed and delivered at least one counterpart to the other parties hereto, each counterpart 13 shall be deemed an original and, taken together, shall constitute one and the same Agreement, 14 Which shall be binding and effective as to the parties hereto. 15 H 16 H 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 12 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board) RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT B C-G �—//� � 4 y By C�� �- /_,,,,, ,WARREN D. WILLIAMS MARION ASHLEY, Chairman General Manager-Chief Engineer Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: PAMELA J. WALLS KECIA HARPER-IHEM Co Counsel Clerk of the Board By VIZ By VID H.K. H FF Deputy Deputy County Counsel (SEAL) Agreement—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Urban Runoff Discharge Permit Implementation Agreement— Santa Ana Region AM:cw P8/134125 - 13 - COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By MARION ASHLEY, Chairman Riverside County Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: PAMELA J. WALLS KECIA HARPER-IHEM Cou ounsel Clerk of the Board '�• B , By Y DAVID H.K. HUFF Deputy Deputy County Counsel (SEAL) - 14 - NOV 3 0 2010 0)A D l l:1;� APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF BEAUMO T KN\r By 1, 0C. By � City A tomey Mayor ATTEST: By �'Ai/w', City Clerk (SEAL) - 15 - APPROVED AS TO FOnRM: CIT F CALIMESA City Attorney Mayor ATTEST: n n B City Clerk (SEAL) - 16 - APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF CANYON LAKE By (%�aZW-'W-A-jg]aL r By City mey Mayor,/v ATTEST: B 6it 4rk (SEAL) - 17- APP OVED A TO FORM: ) CITY ONA By 1 By I City tto ey ATTE : By City Clerk (SEAL) - 18 - APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TVAL By CJ By CiVuorney Ll Mayor ATTEST: By r _1 7 y CG (.SEAL) - 19 - APPROVED T F CITY OF H ET By t2BYE City Attorney Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk (SEAL) -20- APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE By sy Cit Attorney Mayor ATTENdbrk By City (SEAL) - 21 - APPROVED AS TO F RM: CITY OF MENIFEE By By City Attorney Mayor ATTEST: By City Clerk (SEAL) -22 - APPROVED AS TO ORM: C OF O EN p J,EY By sy �f ' ty tto ey Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: ity C erk (SEAL) -23 - APPROVED AS Tp FORM: CIT 7 ETA By,' Ln lt� BY Ci tome ayor ATTEST: l By-j / City Cler, -7- (SEAL) - 24 - APPROVED A O FORM: CITY OF NORCO By By 8,zt� City Attorney Mayor Pro Tem Harper Berwin Hanna ATTES By jerk n a K. Jaco. (SEAL) - 25- APPROVED AS TO FORM: Cl PE By By r City Attorney M Eric E. Dunn D R. Busch A TEST: l; T', By Ci�lerk Judy L. Haughney, C.M.0 (SEAL) - 26 - APPROVED AS .-O-FORM: CITY OF RIVERSIDE ,B ✓'Cy kttorney Mayor ATTEST: By Dated: January 21,_ 2Q11 City Cler{ (SEAL) - 27 - APPROVED AS TO FORM: C` Y OF SANjACJNT B By 1 Ci Attorney Mayor ATTEST: By &Lxf M� City Clerk (SEAL) - 28 - APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF WILDOMAR By City Attorney Mayor ATTEST: By . City Clerk (SEAL) - 29 -