PC19-458RESOLUTION NO. PC 19.458
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
DENY PLOT PLAN NO. 2017-167 FOR THE MILL CREEK
PROMENADE, A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERGIAL
DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF TOWNHOMES, CLUSTER SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCES, A COMMERCIAL CENTER COMPRISED OF
RETAIL, OFFICE, AND RESTAURANT SPACE, A BUSINESS PARK,
AND OPEN SPACE IN THE FORM OF A PRESERVED STREAMBED,
LOCATED ON 58.51 ACRES AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
GARBANI ROAD AND HAUN ROAD
Whereas, on June 2, 2017 the applicant, Sherman & Garbani, LLC and Sherman
and Haun, LP, filed a formal application with the City of Menifee for Plot Plan (PP2017-
167) for a residential and commercial center on 58.51 acres. The residential, commercial
and business park development will include a 194 townhouse community on
approximately 13.82 acres, a204 unit clustered single family residential development on
20.51 acres, a 117,245 square foot commercia! center comprised of retail, office, and
restaurant space on 14.85 acres, a 33,171 square foot industrial park on 2.79 acres and
1 .69 acres of open space in the form of a preserved dry streambed (and surrounding
area); and,
Whereas, on August 14,2019, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing on Plot PIan No.2017-167, considered all publictestimonyaswell as all materials
in the staff report and accompanying documents, which hearing was publicly noticed by a
publication in the Press Enterprise, a newspaperof genera! circulation, an agenda posting,
and notice to property owners within 300 feet of the project boundaries as well as both
single family neighborhoods north of the project, and to persons requesting public notice
and continued the project to September 11,2019 in order for staff to provide findings to
deny the Plot Plan; and
Whereas, on September 11,2019, the Planning Commission held the continued
public hearing on PIot Plan No. 2017-167 which was not required to be re-noticed because
it was continued to a date certain; and
Whereas, the Planning Commission of the City of Menifee makes the following
Findings:
Consisfency with the General Plan. The Plot Plan rs rnconsistent with the
General Plan Land Use Map, and applicable General Plan objectives,
policies, and programs:
The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Economic
Development Corridor - Southern Gateway (EDC-SG). ln general, areas
designated EDC are envisioned to develop primarily as nonresidential
uses, with residential uses playing a supporting role. The mixed use project
proposed by the plot plan, would develop more than sixty percent of the
58.51 acre site with townhouse or single family residential neighborhoods.
As such the project is primarily residential with non-residential uses playing
a supporting role. Therefore the project is inconsistent with the Genera!
Plan.
Section 1:
lnconsistencv with General Plan
Plot Plan No.2017-767
Page 2 of 5
The primarily residential project is located adjacent to EDC-SG designated
property to the south and east and would not be compatible with the intent
of the EDC-SG which envisioned the Southern Gateway to be developed
primarily with Business Park uses.
Plannino and nd Use Government Code ion 65589.5.
Section 65589.5 of the Planning and Land Use Government Code states
that when a proposed housing development project complies with
applicable, objective general plan, zoning, and subdivision standards and
criteria, including design review standards, the City is required to make
specific findings under this section of the Code. lt has been determined
that the project does not comply with the General Plan and therefore
Section 65589.5 is not applicable to the project. However, it should be
noted that the project would generate adverse significant and unavoidable
impacts specifically, under the environmental categories of Air Quality,
Greenhouse Gases, Transportation/Traffic and Noise upon the public
health and safety unless disapproved. These direct impacts generated by
the project are based on objective standards including the South Coast Air
Quality Management Plan and City's General Plan and are discussed in
the Environmental lmpact Report prepared for the project.
Consistencv with Housino Element
The Project site is not identified in the City's Housing Element as a Housing
Opportunity Site for residential. The Housing Element did not assume the
site would contribute any dwelling units needed to meet the City's Regional
Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). Therefore denial of the Project
would not conflict with any density range or housing opportunity anticipated
in the Housing Element.
Section 2: Consisfency with the Zoning Code. The Plot Plan is inconsisfenf with the
zone designation Arlap, and applicable development standards within the
zone designation:
The project site is currently zoned EDC-SG and is consistent with the intent
and vision of the General Plan land use designation of Economic
Development Corridor- Southern Gateway. The provisions of the EDC-SG
District zoning allow for areas designated EDC to develop primarily as
nonresidentia! uses, with residential uses playing a supporting role as
provided for in the General Plan. ln contrast, the plot plan does not
implement the intent and vision of the EDC-SG as it proposes developing
more than sixty percent of site with primarily residential uses. As such the
plot plan is inconsistent with intent and vision of the EDC-SG and the
project is not consistent with the zoning.
Surrounding Uses. Approval of the Plot Plan will create conditions
materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or
injurious to or incompatible with other properties or land uses in the project
vicinity.
Section 3:
Plot Plan No.2017-L67
Page 3 of 5
Section 4:
The Specific Plan is located at the southwest corner of Garbani Road and
Haun Road and is surrounded by single-family residences to the north,
industrial uses or vacant land to the south and east, and vacant land to the
west.
Environmental impacts resulting from the implementation of the Plot Plan
have been analyzed in an Environmental lmpact Report (ElR). The EIR
determined that the project would generate significant and unavoidable
impacts under the categories of Air Quality, Greenhouse Gases,
Transportation/Traffic, and Noise which are materially detrimental to the
public health, safety and general welfare and injurious to and incompatible
with other properties and land uses in the project vicinity including
residential neighborhoods north of the project site. The Planning
Commission found that the project benefits did not outweigh the significant
and unavoidable impacts of the proposed project; and therefore, the
adverse environmental effects are not considered acceptable. Therefore,
the project will create conditions materially detrimental to the public health,
safety and general welfare and injurious to or incompatible with other
properties and land uses in the project vicinity.
Compliance with CEQA. Processing and denial of the Plot Plan are in
compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act.
An Environmenta! lmpact Report (ElR) has been completed for the project
which determined that the project would generate significant and
unavoidable impacts under the categories of Air Quality, Greenhouse
Gases, Transportationffraffic, and Noise.
More specifically, the project would have the following impacts
Air Quality
The project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts relating to
operational NOx emissions during operations that would exceed applicable
South Coast Air Quality Management District regional thresholds of
significance during operations even after implementation of mitigation
measures and no feasible measures have been identified to reduced to
levels that are less than significant. Further, the NOx exceedances would
also cause significant and unavoidable impacts because the project would
not be consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan, which would result
in a cumulatively unavoidable significant adverse impact.
Greenhouse Gases
The proposed Project will contribute to global climate change by its
incremental contribution of greenhouse gasses. Even with implementation
of the recommended mitigation measures identifled in Section 4.4.7 of the
Air Quality Section, the project exceeds both the SCAQMD screening
threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e (Project = 1 1,385.63 MTCO2e) and the
interpolated SCAQMD 2022 Target Service Population threshold of 4.56
MTCO2e/SP/year (Project = 7.7 MTCO2e/SP/year) for projects. Thus,
exceedances of applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds are considered
significant and unavoidable, and the operation of the proposed project
Plot Plan No.2017-L67
Page 4 of 5
would create a significant cumulative impact to global climate change.
Project-related GHG emissions are therefore considered to be significant
and would result in an unavoidable significant adverse impact on global
climate change.
Noise
The existing noise setting of the proposed project site will be permanently
altered as a result of implementation of the proposed Project. Offsite traffic
activities are forecast to make a cumulative contribution to significant noise
along four affected roadways:
. Tupelo Street - Bradley to Sherman Road. Garbani Road - Sherman to Haun Road. Bradley Road - south of Craig Avenue. Sherman Road - Tupelo Street to Garbani Road
Mitigation is available consisting of installing noise barriers or interior noise
reducing modifications to existing homes however this mitigation cannot be
enforced. As such, the Project will contribute significant and unavoidable
offsite cumulative noise impacts and as such will cause an unavoidable
adverse noise impacts in the project area.
ln order to allow for the approval of the project, a Statement of Overriding
Considerations was prepared for the EIR listing possible benefits provided
by the project; however, the Planning Commission has considered these
benefits against the significant and unavoidable impacts generated by the
project and has determined that the benefits listed in the Statement of
Overriding Considerations do not outweigh the potential significant
unavoidable adverse environmenta! impacts. As such, the Planning
Commission recommends that the City Council deny certification of the
ElR, pursuant to a separate Resolution.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Menifee hereby
recommends to the City Council the following:
1 That the City Council determine that the Findings set out above are true
and correct.
Tra ns po rtatio n/Traffi c
lmplementing the proposed Project will generate a substantial number of
new trips that are forecast to require modifications to the area and local
circulation systems. With implementation of the proposed circulation
system improvements the project will not cause a significant adverse
impact to the circulation system. With implementation of the identified
offsite roadway improvements, the long-term, project specific and
cumulative circulation system impacts will not be significant if these
improvements are completed prior to when the traffic is actually generated.
However, given the uncertain nature of the timing of all improvements, an
unavoidable significant adverse transportation impact will result from
implementation of the proposed Project.
Plot Plan No.2017-t67
Page 5 of 5
Attest:
That the City Council finds that the facts presented within the public record
and within the Planning Commission Resolution provide a basis to deny
Plot Plan No. 2017-167.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this the 11th day of September, 2019
Robe Kanrvin, Chairman
te puty City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Ajit h tant City Attorney
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF MENIFEE
l, Stephanie Roseen, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Menifee, do hereby certifythat the
foregoing Planning Commission Resolution No. PC19-458 was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Menifee at a meeting thereof held on the 11 of September 2019 by
the following vote:
SS
)
)
)
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
Phillips, Thomas, Kanruin
Diederich, Madrid
None
None
nie Roseen, CMC
Deputy City Clerk
\E#
Op-
-
'la
IEN FE EM;j: